This Obamacare rule delay could really hurt
Insurers are getting a one-year reprieve on a key provision aimed at limiting consumers' out-of-pocket costs.
The Obama administration touts the Affordable Care Act as a way to make health care insurance both widely available and cost-effective. But a new twist in the law may put the second goal at risk.
Buried in a tangle of bureaucratic language is a key change to Obamacare that will delay an out-of-pocket cost limit for individuals and families, The New York Times reports.
Obamacare had promised to hold out-of-pocket spending to no more than $6,350 for an individual and $12,700 for a family. But federal officials are now allowing some insurers to take an additional year to meet those limits, the newspaper notes.
Why delay the cost ceiling? Pressure from insurers, according to an unnamed administration official.
"We had to balance the interests of consumers with the concerns of health plan sponsors and carriers, which told us that their computer systems were not set up to aggregate all of a person's out-of-pocket costs. They asked for more time to comply," the official said.
The change was called illegal and unconstitutional by Sen. Rand Paul, R.-Ky., Fox News reports. "The president doesn't get to write legislation, and it's illegal and unconstitutional for him to try and change legislation by himself," Paul said.
People most likely to be hurt by the delay are those with chronic conditions. Multiple sclerosis patients, for instance, can face direct treatment costs that exceed $20,000 per year, according to a 2007 paper. Some drugs for chronic illnesses can cost more than a car, such as Sanofi-Aventis' (SNY) Cerazyme, a treatment for Gaucher disease that can cost as much as $200,000 per year.
The delay was greeted with dismay by representatives of several groups, including the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, which told The New York Times it was disappointed, and the American Cancer Society, which warned that patients "could continue to have enormous financial pressure."
By 2015, health plans must be in compliance with the law.
But given that this tweak comes after Obamacare's one-year delay on its employer mandate to provide insurance, it raises doubts about whether the legislation will actually provide the relief it had promised.
Follow Aimee Picchi on Twitter at @aimeepicchi.
Nancy Pelosi and Forrest Gump both had it right,
Nancy told us we would find out about Obama Care once they passed it. How's that working out?
Forrest told us Stupid is as Stupid does! Enough said!
Obama lied-again. After all the deals and special exceptions, one small business in North Carolina will be the only available/eligible/mandated Obama careless entity. Premium per person will be $5 gazillion per single, per month. Everyone else is excluded or gets it free.
We gotta start funding Obamas face on Rushmore------at the bottom as worst president ever.
Oh, what a surprise!!! I guess I shouldn't plan on spending any of the money Obama was going to save me. Let's see, when Obama says costs are going to rise ie electricity and fuel costs, they go up. When Obama says my health costs will go down, they go up. Hmmmmm, does that mean he only lies half of the time?
"here's the real rub. they are not gonna verify incomes when it comes to getting the poor uninsured enlisted. kinda like what they did with the sub prime loans"
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Banking industry representatives say smaller lenders may not be able to handle new rules designed to make mortgages safer for consumers, which could hurt potential homebuyers. Are they right?
- Why GM, Chrysler are riding high
- Survey: Dashboard lights fail to send right message
- Can you opt out of Medicare?
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Plans revived for 'floating city' of 50,000 people
- Homeowners insurance: Bountiful coverage for bad cooking
- 3 stocks for the 3-D printing revolution
- Why restaurants are adding tablets to the tables
- America's greatest export is its debt
[BRIEFING.COM] A bit of an upward thrust the last 30 minutes brought the three major indices back close to where they started the day. Thus far, however, buyers haven't been able to take total control of the action.
The Advance-Decline line is looking better from earlier, although still favors decliners at the NYSE and Nasdaq. Things look a little better on that front at the Nasdaq where decliners lead by a 13-to-12 margin.
Apple (AAPL 571.80, +6.80) ... More
More Market News
The brightest minds at top university endowments were unable to match the returns of a rather boring portfolio of stocks and bonds.