This Obamacare rule delay could really hurt
Insurers are getting a one-year reprieve on a key provision aimed at limiting consumers' out-of-pocket costs.
The Obama administration touts the Affordable Care Act as a way to make health care insurance both widely available and cost-effective. But a new twist in the law may put the second goal at risk.
Buried in a tangle of bureaucratic language is a key change to Obamacare that will delay an out-of-pocket cost limit for individuals and families, The New York Times reports.
Obamacare had promised to hold out-of-pocket spending to no more than $6,350 for an individual and $12,700 for a family. But federal officials are now allowing some insurers to take an additional year to meet those limits, the newspaper notes.
Why delay the cost ceiling? Pressure from insurers, according to an unnamed administration official.
"We had to balance the interests of consumers with the concerns of health plan sponsors and carriers, which told us that their computer systems were not set up to aggregate all of a person's out-of-pocket costs. They asked for more time to comply," the official said.
The change was called illegal and unconstitutional by Sen. Rand Paul, R.-Ky., Fox News reports. "The president doesn't get to write legislation, and it's illegal and unconstitutional for him to try and change legislation by himself," Paul said.
People most likely to be hurt by the delay are those with chronic conditions. Multiple sclerosis patients, for instance, can face direct treatment costs that exceed $20,000 per year, according to a 2007 paper. Some drugs for chronic illnesses can cost more than a car, such as Sanofi-Aventis' (SNY) Cerazyme, a treatment for Gaucher disease that can cost as much as $200,000 per year.
The delay was greeted with dismay by representatives of several groups, including the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, which told The New York Times it was disappointed, and the American Cancer Society, which warned that patients "could continue to have enormous financial pressure."
By 2015, health plans must be in compliance with the law.
But given that this tweak comes after Obamacare's one-year delay on its employer mandate to provide insurance, it raises doubts about whether the legislation will actually provide the relief it had promised.
Follow Aimee Picchi on Twitter at @aimeepicchi.
Nancy Pelosi and Forrest Gump both had it right,
Nancy told us we would find out about Obama Care once they passed it. How's that working out?
Forrest told us Stupid is as Stupid does! Enough said!
Obama lied-again. After all the deals and special exceptions, one small business in North Carolina will be the only available/eligible/mandated Obama careless entity. Premium per person will be $5 gazillion per single, per month. Everyone else is excluded or gets it free.
We gotta start funding Obamas face on Rushmore------at the bottom as worst president ever.
Oh, what a surprise!!! I guess I shouldn't plan on spending any of the money Obama was going to save me. Let's see, when Obama says costs are going to rise ie electricity and fuel costs, they go up. When Obama says my health costs will go down, they go up. Hmmmmm, does that mean he only lies half of the time?
"here's the real rub. they are not gonna verify incomes when it comes to getting the poor uninsured enlisted. kinda like what they did with the sub prime loans"
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages began the new trading week on a slightly lower note with small caps leading the weakness. The Russell 2000 shed 0.3% while the S&P 500 slipped less than a point with six sectors ending in the red.
Equity indices began the day in negative territory with only the Nasdaq (-0.04%) making a very brief appearance in the green. After sliding through the first hour of action, the major averages reversed and spent the remainder of the session climbing off ... More
More Market News
Like many companies this winter, the fast-food giant blamed a drop in same-store sales on the weather. But could its problems be bigger than a snowbank?
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'