Why prepaid cards are replacing paychecks
Retail and restaurant employees are getting increasingly frustrated with debit payments that save employers money at workers' expense.
Employees at a McDonald's (MCD) outlet in Shavertown, Pa., recently filed a class-action suit against the fast-food giant for issuing paychecks through a prepaid debit card laden with various fees. The suit claims that fees on the card, issued by Chase, include 75 cents for online bill payment, $1 for balance inquiries, $1.50 for ATM withdrawals, $5 for teller-assisted cash withdrawals and $15 to replace a lost or stolen card.
While even government unemployment programs have begun issuing debit cards instead of printing checks, the standard complaint from recipients is that the fees chip away at their allotted take and are just a way for companies and government agencies to pass on check-printing costs to employees and the unemployed.
On Monday, The New York Times reported that debit card use among cost-conscious U.S. payroll departments is rising steadily. Yum Brands' (YUM) Taco Bell, Walgreen (WAG) and Wal-Mart (WMT) are among the larger users of prepaid paycheck debit cards, along with many others in the restaurant and retail industries. Last year, $34 billion was loaded onto 4.6 million active payroll cards, according to the research firm Aite Group. That group said that amount should reach $68.9 billion and 10.8 million cards by 2017.
Card issuers including Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC) and Citigroup (C) are feeding into companies' fears about shrinking margins by presenting payroll cards as a cheaper, more efficient payroll alternative. A calculator on Visa's (V) website, for example, estimates that a company with 500 workers could save $21,000 a year by switching from checks to payroll cards.
But why target retail and restaurant workers? Well, as Citigroup points out, they're the group least likely to have bank accounts and most likely to simply cash their checks. A Citigroup spokeswoman told the Times that "someone cashing a payroll check for $500 would end up paying $15 at a 3% check-cashing fee."
The numbers of unbanked Americans backs up that assertion somewhat. About 10 million households in the United States do not use a bank at all, up from 9 million four years ago, according to estimates from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. And 24 million households that do have a bank account still use expensive financial services like prepaid cards, the agency said.
With retailers like Home Depot (HD) and Limited Brands (LTD), the parent company of Victoria's Secret, offering employees a choice between direct deposit and prepaid card to cut check costs, bank-free employees lack other options. That leaves them wide open to the fees charged by companies, including NetSpend of Austin, Texas, the largest payroll card issuer in the country.
On some of its payroll cards, NetSpend charges $2.25 for out-of-network ATM withdrawals, 50 cents for balance inquiries via a representative, 50 cents for a purchase using the card, $5 for statement reprints, $10 to close an account, $25 for a balance-protection program and $7.50 after 60 days of inactivity. While some banks have similar fees, bank customers have the option to shift their money to institutions with less onerous stipulations.
With payroll cards, employees are forced into the bank or financial provider of their cost-cutting employer's choice.
Welcome to the new form of slavery. This is very similar to what the coal companies did back in the late 19th through mid 20th century. Coal miners were paid in coal company script. Essentially, it was a company IOU that could only be redeemed that the coal company-owned store. The goods there were over priced. Hence, the coal miner was always in debt to the "company store." Miners were forbidden to leave town if they owed money to the "company store" and could be arrested and imprisoned for 'theft.' I'll bet that the companies issuing these debit cards in lieu of pay have either a direct or indirect ownership in the company handling the transactions and charging said employees for these transactions.
Many of the same retailers who are looking at implementing such a debit card system are the same ones who buy a great percentage of their products from the unsafe and slave-like conditions of Bangladesh!
Hey folks! Better read your American History of the 19th and 20th century. What the hell do you think gave rise to labor unions?
It's the sign of the mark of the beast people
beware the end is coming
Many folks in the mid- to upper strata of "99%" do not realize how difficult it is for those at or below the poverty level in the United States to establish a checking account with "mainstream" banking institutions. Many of us become upset when we see the vast array of 'fees' tacked on to our various bank accounts, but still grudgingly pay them as a cost of having these accounts and the 'convenience' they allow us, as it is nearly impossible to conduct our personal business in any documentable fashion otherwise.
For the folks at the lower end of the "99%", these fees are nearly insurmountable and may mean the difference between keeping the bank account or purchasing necessities for themselves or dependents - read meals, clothing, medication.
I think the "1%" is hell-bent on re-establishing an oligarchy.
Two words: this sucks. Parasitical, opportunistic banking institutions feeding like income draining ticks on the working poor. Pathetic (this last is the third word).
direct deposit, I can't go to the ATM without being charged a $4 fee, if i transfer from the card to my bank account I have to wait the extra 4 days. It's friggen stupid
Hey I've got a good way to cut costs; slash CEO beanies and pay by 75%, and or, import the CEO people from China; hum...what a great idea, then pass the saving to your overworked employees....
I hear a CEO from China, India makes far less than $100K;, hum no more over paid underworked American CEO whom all just bankrupt the companies anyway; maybe the China ones can makes profit and keep their employees happy...worth a try...
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market capped the trading week with losses across the major averages. The S&P 500 fell 0.5% to surrender its weekly gain, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.7%) and Russell 2000 (-0.9%) underperformed. The two indices posted respective losses of 0.8% and 0.6% for the week.
Equity indices were pressured from the get-go after several heavyweights disappointed the market with their earnings and/or guidance, which led to some broader profit-taking. After ... More
More Market News
The idea of US crude being a shelter from turmoil abroad may not be as far fetched as it seems.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'