Online betting site Intrade abruptly closes

The site allowed users to bet on just about anything, but saw its traffic take a steep plunge after US regulators stepped in.

By Kim Peterson Mar 12, 2013 3:58PM
Image: Crystal ball (Randy Allbritton/Getty Images)Don't bet on Intrade making a comeback. The online prediction betting site that pegged the odds for everything from presidential candidates to Oscar nominees has mysteriously shut down.

The site, based in Ireland, suddenly stopped all trading activity this week, and posted a notice for customers that suggested "financial irregularities" were to blame. The site closed all open contracts their fair market value on Sunday.

Some of the problems may relate to $2.6 million in insufficiently documented payments to its founder, The Financial Times reports. The founder, John Delaney, died while attempting to climb Mount Everest in 2011.

Intrade was already running into legal trouble. Last year, the site shut its doors to users in the United States after receiving a civil complaint from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Regulators said that U.S. Intrade users were betting real money on options contracts that predicted which way gold, oil and other commodities would turn. It's illegal for people to trade commodity options unless they are listed on a real exchange registered with the commission.

Pulling U.S. users away from Intrade was disastrous for the site. Traffic fell 77% from 287,000 visitors in November to 67,000 one month later, The Times reports. That raised questions about Intrade's effectiveness as a prediction site.

Intrade became a hot topic last year, as presidential election watchers checked in to see how people were betting. The site was accurate in picking Barack Obama as the winner. But customers could place bets on just about anything.

More on moneyNOW

Mar 12, 2013 6:23PM
Only people registered can bet on futures.  Naturally, if they allowed everyone to do it, there would be no need for Wall Street-  not a bad idea.
I wouldn't bet one penny with an on-line betting company.  I don't trust anything on-line, unless it's a well established business that just has on-line purchasing as an added attraction.  If a company doesn't have an address you can go to, stay away from it.
Mar 12, 2013 5:31PM
Mar 12, 2013 7:23PM
Another thing--- Poker Stars was the most Legit gambling site ever. No 2 people could play from the same IP address until a thorough investigation was made by the administration of Poker Stars. Like hubby and wife in the same household , deposit/withdrwals made etc.etc.
Mar 12, 2013 7:13PM
  Patrick (pirwin)    how can college kids  or anyone see your cards online without your IP etc.?? but several players can join the same game and collaborate.  I've even seen the regulars at the Casinos do that in several occasions  So Patrick the Casino business isn't 100% legit either.
Mar 12, 2013 7:54PM
Online betting is for idiots. Even if bets aren't accepted from the same IP address, there are numerous, easy ways to communicate with others who have a different IP address. If you want to make a fortune in online betting, start your on online betting company. I guarantee you'll be the winner.
Mar 14, 2013 3:48AM
It nailed the election. I don't think it ever had Romney ahead of Obama.
Mar 12, 2013 11:57PM
In all fairness, someone (other than insiders) has to win for it to be considered legitimate. That said, it is fair to say that even if it was an honest betting site, it would never be good enough just because it didn't sit right with many governments.  Although we let our politicians rule and rob us every day, there is not enough backlash to keep from the bullying.  Now then, who is playing fair?
Mar 12, 2013 8:39PM
online poker is illegal and all the sites out of canada are a scam. it sucks because i love this game. u will lose unless u are working for the site. they have no rules and what happens on the sites is torture and we will call it canadian holdem. nevada is starting some real sites soon hopefully  texas holdem may be back soon
Mar 12, 2013 5:42PM
On -line poker. The risk of having a few frat-boy chimps watching your cards, and betting,raising, and folding accordingly. All in the same room, and sharing the munchies as they fleece you. You have NO oversight, NO recourse, and No certainty of having a fair deal at all. If you cant/ wont go to a legitimate casino, you NEED to get hosed. Life's  harshest lesson learned.  Yes, I've been in casino business, for over 25 years, and cheating is handled very severely. In a home game, or online action, I've not hears too many impressive stories of  supervision or law enforcement ( enFARCEment?). It's your money. FOR A LITTLE WHILE, ANYWAY.   
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?


[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages posted solid gains ahead of tomorrow's policy directive from the Federal Open Market Committee. The S&P 500 rallied 0.8%, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) could not keep pace with the benchmark index.

Equity indices hovered near their flat lines during the first two hours of action, but surged in reaction to reports from the Wall Street Journal concerning tomorrow's FOMC statement. Specifically, Fed watcher Jon Hilsenrath indicated that the statement ... More