Victoria's Secret tries to calm outraged parents
The retailer's new 'Bright Young Things' slogan and suggestive underwear lead to complaints of crossing the line.
That's the question parents are grappling with after the lingerie retailer debuted a spring break collection with the slogan "Bright Young Things."
Victoria's Secret, owned by Limited Brands (LTD), says that the collection falls under its Pink line, which is targeted at college-aged women. But it seems that the word "young" in the slogan, plus items such as panties with "call me" written on the front, are all a bit much for parents. People worried that Victoria's Secret was going after teens, tweens and younger age groups.
The resulting uproar caused Victoria's Secret to take to its Facebook page Monday to explain. "Despite recent rumors, we have no plans to introduce a collection for younger women," the company said. "'Bright Young Things' was a slogan used in conjunction with the college spring break tradition.
More than 1,300 people commented on that Facebook posting, with some defending the store and saying that parents need to be more vigilant with their children. "I don't believe VS would try to market 'suggestive' comments to the young girls," wrote one. "Get real ladies!"
Others lectured Victoria's Secret, saying that the company was backpedaling under fire. "It makes me sick to see such crass-like stuff on your Bright Young Things collection, it's tacky," wrote one man. "I don't have a daughter and sure wouldn't like to see some teens under the age of 18 wearing such tasteless wear."
An open letter to Victoria's Secret about the issue has gone viral on the Internet. The letter is penned by Evan Dolive, who says he is an ordained minister and a father of a 3-year-old girl.
"As a dad, this makes me sick," Dolive said about the "Bright Young Things" issue.
Here's more from the letter:
I believe that this sends the wrong message to not only my daughter but to all young girls. I don’t want my daughter to ever think that her self-worth and acceptance by others is based on the choice of her undergarments. I don’t want my daughter to ever think that to be popular or even attractive she has to have emblazon words on her bottom.
I want my daughter (and every girl) to be faced with tough decisions in her formative years of adolescence. Decisions like should I be a doctor or a lawyer? Should I take calculus as a junior or a senior? Do I want to go to Texas A&M or University of Texas or some Ivy League School? Should I raise awareness for slave trafficking or lack of water in developing nations? There are many, many more questions that all young women should be asking themselves. . . not will a boy (or girl) like me if I wear a "call me" thong?
I want my daughter to know that she is perfect the way she is; I want my daughter to know that no matter what underwear she is wearing it does not define her.
I believe that this new line "Bright Young Things" thwarts the efforts of empowering young women in this country. "Bright Young Things" gives off the message that women are sex objects. This new line promotes it at a dangerously young age.
I am a Christian, and I wear Victoriassecret undergarments. why is it important that I mention I am a Christian? Simple-because that is the most important thing about me, it is who I am, and just because I wear Victoriassecret undergarments makes me no less of a Christian. I find their material to be rather comfortable, and it actually does empower me as a young woman, being 23 years old and somewhat college age. Wearing a matching bra and panty makes me feel sexy, and attractive. It does not define me and it is for no one elses eyes except for my own-being that i am unmarried. I can understand your concern, modesty is a virtue, nay, a command from God, which I obey and I am sure so does your 3 year old daughter. But there is nothing NOT modest about my intentions, which is to feel like a woman, because I am one, and VS does a good job at helping women around the nation feel like one. You don't know the hearts and intentions of the young women as well as women of all ages who buy VS merchandise, and neither do I, its not your job to judge or critize. Especially being a man. So let them be, and raise your daughter in the LORD, so you wont have to worry about what kind of undergarments she is wearing or who she might or might not show them too (hopefully after she is married and not before).
These items are for adult aged women. Parents of young children need to relax and understand that distinction....
Why is the ordained minister looking at VS anyway? And furthermore, the reference to his 3 year old daughter is just ridiculous!
So when your 13 year old has pictures of her " call me thong" sent from her cell phone to the boy she likes go viral in her school don't be surprised. And when she becomes depressed or flips the other way and shows up pregnant at 14 those same parents will find a place to lay the blame.
Kids ar inundated with marketing messages that if they are not wearing the "right" brand, have a smart phone, not have what every one esle has they are worthless. Talk about drinking the kool-aid!!Advertising and marketing has more influence on our society and values than any other solitary thing I can think of. No, not for all, but for a large enough majority to continue the multi-billion dollar industry. Stupid parents buy into it through producing the cash for them to continue the consumer free-fall to financial disaster and then scratch their heads wondering what happened when their young offspring have to move into the basement and "need a little help"! Of course they are targeting their next generation of spenders and the multitude of "baby mammas" and baby daddies" doesn't seem to be enough of a wake up call.
Provocative garments for teens, tweens and preteens.
Rape in High School
You tell me which way society is headed and who is responsible.
Maybe parents shouldn't be dumping there young girls at the mall unsupervised to go and
purchase these items. Parents need to step up and be responsible for there children.
are they so stupid that they don't know pedophiles will love this stuff , or do they even care? why not let kids be kids instead of trying to make them grow up too fast ? Bombard them with sex and that is what they will think about ; this is a perfect example of why we have a problem today.
Abercrombie and Fitch have been marketing to the youth for years.
I guess VS is trying to corner their part of the market.
I don't care about marketing to adults but not children.
Ever heard of saying NO! That's right if you don't want your daughter to wear it then say NO! Say it with me.... I know it might be a new word to some of you mothers.... but let us try.... NNOO!
when is a child no longer young? is it when they reach 26 years of age and are no longer
permitted on mommy's and daddy's health insurance?
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages finished the session on a lower note as the S&P 500 lost 0.4% while the Nasdaq shed 0.1%. The Russell 2000, which paced the retreat on Tuesday and Wednesday, added 0.2%, trimming its December loss to 3.5%.
After spending the first half of the session in a steady retreat, the S&P 500 found technical support in the 1772 area. Upon reaching that level, the index reversed sharply, and marched back to its flat line. There was no particular catalyst ... More
More Market News
With the universe of this category in its seasonal sweet spot, these picks have tailwinds propelling them into the new year.