Does reward money help solve crimes?
A dispute over awarding $1 million to people involved in a high-profile California manhunt is renewing the debate.
During last month's manhunt in California for Christopher Dorner, the fired Los Angeles cop who apparently went on a deadly revenge-related shooting spree, the city offered a $1 million reward for Dorner's arrest and capture.
Dorner (pictured) committed suicide 10 days after the dragnet began, when we was cornered by authorities in a mountain cabin. Two people have since come forward to claim that reward. But according to the Los Angeles Times, some of the more than 25 individuals and organizations that pledged the reward money are now having second thoughts.
"I've spoken with some groups -- including a few that are substantial -- that have already decided to withdraw their pledges," Ron Cottingham, president of the Peace Officers Research Association of California, told the newspaper. "They said the reward doesn't fit their criteria."
At issue, apparently, is that Dorner died before he could be captured and tried, a fact that one top LAPD officer called "disingenuous" and a loophole that could undermine future police efforts to get information about unsolved crimes.
The practice of offering these rewards goes back hundreds if not thousands of years, but their effectiveness is still being debated by experts.
"Rewards sometimes are funny," FBI veteran Jody Weis told the Chicago Tribune in 2010, when he was the city's police superintendent. "In some places, they generate a lot of information and others they don't." A lot of times the fear of retaliation from criminals is enough to keep people quiet, even if the reward money is substantial.
Some legal professionals worry that rewards can cause problems during a trial. Eugene O'Donnell, a former New York City police officer and prosecutor who now teaches law and police studies at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, noted that juries often take a harder look at a witness who has been paid for information.
The testimony of such witnesses, he told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette last year, "can be ever so slightly tilted because now [he] becomes the beneficiary of the conviction. It can color the way a jury views that witness. It can be the grounds for cross-examination and it can be the grounds for reasonable doubt."
Reward money can come from a variety of sources, says the website Lawyers.com. A lot of cities and states have their own Crime-Stoppers programs, which generate reward money via tax-deductible donations from businesses and individuals. Some police departments are also required to donate part of revenues made from auctioning unclaimed stolen property to those programs. And sometimes a victim's friends, family or even outraged strangers will put up reward money.
And then again, "a lot of people will call just because they feel they should, not just because of the reward money," Allegheny County, Pa., police detective Robert Opferman said in an interview with the Post-Gazette. "I get a lot of feedback when people call in. A lot of times, it doesn't even register that there is a reward. Many tipsters are calling because they don't think what happened was right."
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Strong sales in November kept a strong year on course, and solid profit margins helped as well.
- Can you opt out of Medicare?
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Plans revived for 'floating city' of 50,000 people
- Homeowners insurance: Bountiful coverage for bad cooking
- 3 stocks for the 3-D printing revolution
- Why restaurants are adding tablets to the tables
- America's greatest export is its debt
- True test for Obamacare: Will it make US healthier?
- Who will foot the bill for Detroit's bankruptcy?
[BRIEFING.COM] Precious metals are weak this morning on growing speculation of a Fed taper following strong economic data released earlier today. The GDP was revised up to 3.6% in the second estimate of 3Q2013 GDP from 2.8% in the advance release. That is up from a 2.5% gain in the second quarter and the largest increase since growing 3.9% in 2Q2010. Feb gold pulled back from its session high of $1229.70 and is now trading 2.4% lower at $1217.20. Mar silver dipped to a session low of $19.22 ... More
More Market News
Shares that have taken a beating and are most oversold won't necessarily be the first to recover.