Money trouble: Other shoe drops for Lance Armstrong
A former promoter is suing the disgraced cyclist, demanding he pay back $12 million in prize money.
It must be tough to be one of Lance Armstrong's former promoters. After all, many paid millions to the one-time Tour de France winner, only to have their investments look foolish after he was stripped of his record seven titles for doping.
But one of them isn't moving on quietly. SCA Promotions has sued Armstrong, demanding the return of $12 million in prize money it paid him after winning the 2002, 2003 and 2004 races.
SCA, a promotional marketing company, makes its outrage felt in its lawsuit.
"By now, everyone knows that Lance Armstrong perpetuated what may well be the most outrageous, cold-hearted and elaborate lie in the history of sports," the lawsuit claims.
The lawsuit risks further damage to Armstrong's reputation. If he chooses to fight -- and resists paying back the money -- he might turn off the fans he still has. The case could force Armstrong to go back under oath and face more questions about doping, notes USA Today.
It's not as if Armstrong's reputation hasn't already taken quite a beating.
He admitted to doping in an interview with Oprah Winfrey last month, a confession that opened him up to legal challenges and negotiations with prior supporters. Many viewers felt Armstrong came off as unlikable, a feeling that was aided by his own admission of bullying during during his cycling career.
His interview with Winfrey is cited in SCA's lawsuit, which alleges that the cyclist's statements last month were a "stunning admission of perjury."
In 2004, SCA Promotions had withheld a bonus because of doping allegations, but in sworn testimony in 2005, Armstrong vehemently denied the accusations. SCA eventually gave him a settlement of $7.5 million because -- at the time -- he was the official 2004 winner.
"While he lied to everyone, Lance Armstrong lied to SCA in shocking fashion: while testifying under oath in a legal proceeding," the lawsuit says. (Note: emphasis is in the lawsuit.)
It's not clear whether Armstrong will return the money. According to USA Today, Armstrong's attorney, Tim Herman, last week said the cyclist wasn't planning on paying back the money. The reason? He said there's no precedent for an athlete to return earnings after even being found guilty of wrongdoing.
More on moneyNOW
Martha Stewart went to jail for lying to the feds, not for insider trading. Seems like we're at the same junction again.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
More than 70 percent of the Class of 2012 took out loans. Oh, and they're seeing high unemployment, too.
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
- Should the US scrap the debt ceiling?
- Will new mortgage rules mean fewer lenders?
- Why GM, Chrysler are riding high
- Survey: Dashboard lights fail to send right message
- Can you opt out of Medicare?
[BRIEFING.COM] The drive for five continued today and it was a success. For the fifth straight session, the S&P 500 ended lower. Like the previous four sessions, though, the losses were fairly modest in scope. The S&P 500 declined 0.4%, bringing its total loss for the five sessions to 22 points or 1.2%. All in all, that still qualifies as a pretty tame slide considering the S&P 500 had risen 150 points, or 9.1%, over the previous eight weeks.
Today's ... More
More Market News
The retailer labels the character's fake memoir as non-fiction. This comes weeks after it categorized the the Bible as fiction.