Layoffs at lowest levels since 1997
One placement firm says employers eliminated fewer jobs than they have in 16 years, but labor statistics suggest a bleaker picture.
To all the workers who were laid off in 2012, congratulations: You're one of an elite few.
While it comes as little consolation to those who found themselves on (or back on) the unemployment rolls last year, outplacement consultancy firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported Thursday that the 523,362 layoffs announced in 2012 were the least since 1997. That number was also down 14% from 2011. There were 32,556 job cuts announced in December, a drop of 43% from November and 22% from a year earlier.
Challenger's news came just as Automatic Data Processing (ADP), which processes payroll information for half a million private companies in the U.S., indicated that the private sector added 215,000 jobs in December, up from a revised 148,000 in November. It also comes a day before the Bureau of Labor Statistics is scheduled to release employment numbers for December.
Though analysts predict the Bureau of Labor Statistics will report 150,000 jobs added in December and a 7.7% unemployment rate similar to November's, both the ADP and Challenger reports suggest the fiscal cliff talks weren't much of an obstacle for businesses that needed to fill seats.
"We have not seen this level of job cutting since before the dot-com collapse and subsequent 2001 recession," said John Challenger, chief executive of Challenger, Gray and Christmas, in a statement. "Despite the uncertainty related to the fiscal cliff. . . employers held steady in the final months of the year and avoided a surge in mass layoffs."
Employees shouldn't let any of the above lull them into a false sense of security and encourage them to do backflips to test their company's health care and workers compensation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates that the U.S. economy bled nearly 800,000 jobs through layoffs in the first three quarters of 2012 alone. The BLS has counted more than 1 million layoffs in the U.S. in each of the last four years and in five of the last 10, with layoffs peaking at 2.1 million in 2009. The U.S. had its last "good" year for layoffs in 2004, and even then 885,000 were sent packing.
Even the job growth that's supposedly offsetting those layoff numbers isn't worth getting worked up about. As the Washington Post's Wonkblog points out, those still aren't great numbers. The Hamilton Project’s calculator indicates that the current pace of job growth won't put the U.S. back to pre-crisis employment until 2020. It's also still nowhere close to the more than the average of more than 300,000 jobs the U.S. economy added each month during the 1990s.
The one bit of good news in those Challenger layoff statistics for December is that, unless something goes horribly awry, they shouldn't get much worse in early 2013. In the last decade, the number of layoffs in the first quarter has exceeded the number of layoffs in the fourth quarter of the previous year only once: during the economic collapse in 2009 when 640,000 fourth-quarter layoffs in 2008 were followed by 705,000 layoffs during the next quarter.
Each of those spurts outpaced Challenger's layoff estimate for all of 2012. That doesn't make Challenger's numbers 100% right, but it's a good reminder of why recent economic optimism took a detour around the fiscal cliff.
More on Money Now
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
Trending NOW
- 1.mnkd
- 2.oneok online
- 3.adbe
- 4.tsla
- 5.aeropostale
- 6.nok
- 7.gld
- 8.hlebroking
- 9.vix
- 10.nflx
About moneyNOW
MoneyNOW brings users smart, original and entertaining takes on the latest business and investing topics that are buzzing on the Web.
RECENT POSTS
Economists find that as women grow more self-reliant, marriages become more about wanting commitment than needing it.
- Obamaphone program: Dialing for fraud?
- Lone Signal lets you tweet aliens for a fee
- Russell Brand swings at 'Morning Joe' -- and scores
- 7-Eleven targeted in human smuggling raid
- Why 'Dumb Ways to Die' became a viral hit
- Red Robin ad doesn't go down well with vegetarians
- Pity the millionaire: Mansions in short supply
- Bloomberg's new crusade: Food scraps
- China eyes stockings that shoo away perverts
MARKET UPDATE
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages ended higher across the board as the S&P 500 advanced 0.8%.
Equities climbed steadily since the opening bell as investors prepared for tomorrow's policy decision from the Federal Reserve. Although chatter in recent weeks has included speculation the Fed would look to taper its asset purchases, today's broad gains suggest investors expect mostly reassuring words from Chairman Bernanke at tomorrow's press conference.
All ten sectors ended with ... More
More Market News
TOP STOCKS
This young tech company has a can't-miss concept, but hasn't yet generated real sales. Should you see its recent slump as a buying opportunity, or reason to stay away?
MSN MONEY'S
- Shared
- Commented
- Viewed



