New gun laws hardly adding restrictions
Since Newtown, more states have loosened regulations than have tightened them.
In the wake of the Newtown, Conn., school shootings, officials in five states passed seven laws that make it tougher for residents to purchase weapons. But as The Wall Street Journal noted today, 10 states have weakened such laws.
This trend, described by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence in The Journal, underscores the tough road advocates face in the wake of the Dec. 14 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary that left 20 children and 6 adult staff members dead. That spurred President Obama to make gun control one of his top priorities.
However, that's going to be difficult, given that Republicans control 30 governorships and that most state legislatures are sympathetic to the arguments of the National Rifle Association and other gun rights advocates.
Residents in North Dakota will be able to carry concealed weapons in a church under a bill recently passed by the state legislature. Montana lawmakers went further, allowing people to carry a concealed weapon without a permit. The governors of both states are reviewing the bills, according to the newspaper.
Perhaps the most surprising law The Journal found was in Tennessee, where people are now allowed to store weapon in their vehicles even if their employer objects. Stricter gun measures have even failed in states with legislatures controlled by Democrats, such as Washington and New Mexico.
Another sign that the tide isn't turning against easy gun ownership: Shares of big gunmakers Sturm Ruger (RGR) and Smith & Wesson (SWHC) have given back the gains they made previously, peaking in early March, as fears of wider sales restrictions have proven to be unfounded.
A recent report commissioned by the NRA recommended sending a trained, armed school resource officer to every school in the country and that teachers should carry firearms if they're willing to go through 40 to 60 hours of comprehensive training. Though gun control advocates and many Democrats argue this approach won't make schools safer, the NRA remains undaunted.
"There isn't a mom or a dad anywhere who wouldn't feel better seeing a police car in the parking lot when they drop their kids off at school," said Wayne LaPierre, the group's head, in a recent blog post. "But the powerful elites, who will always have their own security, called our proposal absurd. You know what's really absurd? Not protecting our children at school."
Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
Gun control has never worked and never will.
The focus should be people control.
I think we need to have a little discussion about the difference of the letter of the law versus the intent of the law when it comes to the right to bear arms. There are a lot of people that use the argument that we should have the right to keep our guns because of hunting purposes. This is really not a very strong argument. Hunting anymore is considered more of a sport then a means to provide food for a family, though it does in fact do that as well. The real reason, and the best reason that we need to uphold our constitutional right to bear arms has to do with defense against persecution.
This was the intent of the second amendment. The second amendment was not written for hunting purposes. The founding fathers had just come out of a brutal, bloody war with England. They had seen firsthand what it was like to live under strong control, one type being gun control. They did not want that for their new country that they were creating. They wanted to make sure that it was in the constitution that members of this country would always get to keep that right of freedom.
If you look at the second amendment in this way, there should be no gun types restrictions whatsoever. The letter of the law states “the right to bear arms.” A person could pick this apart (which they have) and say that it doesn’t say what kind of arms so we can outlaw different types of weapons and its okay because it doesn’t say that people have the right to bear any and all types of arms. But if you really look at the intent of this law, that is EXACTLY what it says.
Republicans my a$$.
I believe a survey would show more democrats to be gun owners than republicans.
When the good guy owns a gun he never misses his target and always shoots
the bad guy.
Even if the ridiculous proposal to require background checks whenever any firearm changes hands, including the passing of a gun from father to offspring, should become law, it would have absolutely NO effect on gun violence. No ****er will ever run a background check on his fellow gang member when he gives or sells him a (probably stolen) gun. Nor will anyone else who sells weapons to strangers in bars or on the street.
Background checks will become helpful when, and ONLY when, there is some realistic method of obtaining individuals' mental histories, not just criminal histories. ALL of the maniacs who have perpetrated mass shootings in the U.S. were, in fact, maniacs. Incidentally, every one of them is/was a "progressive," "liberal," or whatever left-wing tag you care to attach. The maniac in the movie theater even worked for Obama's campaign.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the Thursday session on an upbeat note with blue chips showing relative strength for the second consecutive day. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.4%) and S&P 500 (+0.3%) settled ahead of the Russell 2000 (+0.2%) and the Nasdaq Composite (+0.1%). It is worth mentioning the benchmark index posted its fourth consecutive gain, registering a new record closing high at 1992.38.
Equity indices climbed out of the gate thanks to early strength among ... More
More Market News
New legislation is allowing foreign companies to finally invest in the country's vast oil reserves.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'