Elizabeth Warren terrifies Wall Street at hearing
Financial regulators had no straight answers about taking banks to trial, but the Democratic Senator's banking committee debut was more about setting examples than starting reform.
If this was the plan of Congressional Republicans, Wall Street lobbyists and outgoing Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner when they opposed her taking the director's seat at the consumer bureau back in 2011, then well played.
Now a freshman Democratic Senator from Massachusetts, Warren's first hearing boiled down to one question that Americans have been positing since the financial crisis began roughly five years ago: When was the last time anybody took a Wall Street bank to trial instead of reaching a settlement?
The result played out like the least funny version of Abbott and Costello's “Who's On First” routine ever performed:
Warren: The question I really want to ask is about how tough you are, about how much leverage you really have in these settlements. Tell me a little bit about the last few times you've taken the biggest financial institutions on Wall Street all the way to a trial. Anybody?
Thomas Curry, head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency: The institutions I've supervise, national banks and federal thrifts, we've actually had a fair number of consent orders [settlements]. We do not have to bring people to trial to...
Warren: I appreciate that you say you don't have to bring them to trial. My question is, when did you bring them to trial?
Curry: We have not had to do it as a practical matter to achieve our supervisory goals.
“We have not had to do it” is apparently pinch-running for “I don't know” on third base. Warren later attempted the same routine with Elise Walter, head of the Securities and Exchange Commission:
Walter: Among our remedies are penalties, but the penalties we can get are limited. We've asked for additional authority -- my predecessor did -- to raise penalties. When we look at these issues, and we truly believe that we have a very vigorous enforcement program, we look at the distinction between what we can get if we go to trial and could get if we don't.
Warren: I appreciate that. That's what everybody does. The question I'm really asking is can you identify the last time when you took the Wall Street banks to trial?
Walter: I will have to get back to you with the specific information, but we do litigate and we do have settlements that are either rejected by the commission or not put forward for review.
Nobody else offered an answer, which prompted Warren to note that average citizens are targeted by district attorneys and U.S. attorneys for far less just to make examples of them. Though she never said as much, Warren's implication was that financial regulators should perhaps consider doing the same to the institutions they oversee.
“I'm really concerned that 'too big to fail' has become 'too big for trial,'" Warren said.
The reaction to the financial crisis hasn't been short on bluster, as Goldman Sachs (GS) CEO Lloyd Blankfein can attest. It's Warren's ability to put some regulatory weight behind that bluster that should make a banking industry already shaken by scandal and regulatory scrutiny even more nervous.
More on moneyNOW
I like Warren. Maybe she will put some Bankers in Jail.
Start at Citimortage.
Folk singer,Woody Guthrie said it best: "Some rob you with a six gun, some with a fountain pen"! Banksters are the latter! Banks might be too big to fail, but none is too big to indict!
Scare 'em. Let's get a hatchet into the hands of this 'Lizzy' to fix the problem. Give 'em hell 'Lizbeth!
hmmm.......& the plot thickens.......how about putting some politicians in jail.......eg: the ones
that required the banking/morgage industry to loan money to home buyers that couldn't
afford down payments or mortgages ? And then there's the story of the Clinton administration
repealing the Glass/Steagal Act.......written post WW2 to regulate the banking/mortgage
industry........does the bill Dodd/Frank...come to mind.........there's enough crooks to go
around..........but don't let your heart be troubled.........cause when one retires or goes to jail
.......another will promptly fill the absent predecessor's spot..............politics,nepotism, &
corruption make the world go round..............
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
A basic income policy can actually ensure a decent standard of living for everyone.
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
[BRIEFING.COM] A solid November employment report translated into a solid day of gains for the major averages. While there was some talk that the encouraging job growth raised the odds of the Fed announcing a tapering at its December meeting, the message of the markets today was either that it didn't believe there would be a tapering this month or that it doesn't fear a tapering this month.
It was just one day, yet there was ample meaning wrapped up in the connection that the 10-yr ... More
More Market News
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.