Whole Foods CEO calls Obamacare 'fascist'
John Mackey originally called the health care mandate socialist. Both declarations bum out his liberal buyer base.
During a conversation on Wednesday with National Public Radio, Mackey made the following observation about the new health care law:
It's more like fascism. In fascism, the government doesn't own the means of production, but they do control it -- and that's what's happening with our health care programs and these reforms.
Mackey's position has gone through a remarkable evolution since 2009, when he wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed and used a Margaret Thatcher quote to equate President Barack Obama's health care platform to socialism. At the time, he suggested more passive measures limiting government control over health care and empowering health care providers to cross state borders with coverage and offer high-deductible plans similar to what his Whole Foods employees receive. He then bit the woven hemp gloves on the hand that feeds his empire by stating the following:
Many promoters of health-care reform believe that people have an intrinsic ethical right to health care -- to equal access to doctors, medicines and hospitals. While all of us empathize with those who are sick, how can we say that all people have more of an intrinsic right to health care than they have to food or shelter?
That last statement, according to Time, was enough to rile Mackey's liberal customers and prompt boycotts of his stores by groups like Single Payer Action. His latest declaration -- on NPR, no less -- may be prompting even more soul searching in Whole Foods' Prius- and Subaru-strewn parking lots.
In Mackey's defense, he hasn't identified as liberal in a good, long time. Mackey started out working at a vegetarian co-op and his Austin, Texas-based company grew from a vegetarian grocery store he and his girlfriend founded in Austin in the late '70s, but he's since drifted from his leftward leanings. He's still a vegetarian and still makes humane animal treatment one of Whole Foods' cornerstone issues, but publicly identified himself as a free-market libertarian during a debate in 2005. In later years, he also took positions against both labor unions and human-caused climate change.
Mackey's health care position puts him in line with Papa John's (PZZA) chief exec John Schnatter, who vowed last year to raise prices and cut employee hours because of the new health care law. The pizza magnate openly endorsed Republican candidate Mitt Romney during last year's presidential race and held a fundraiser at his Kentucky estate that would prompt the stereotypical Whole Foods customer into a kombucha spit take.
Yet Mackey's Whole Foods isn't the only corporation commonly associated with the American left to criticize the health care mandate. Starbucks (SBUX) CEO Howard Schultz, whose company helped make the slur "latte-sipping liberal" possible, told the Seattle Times that the law may be counterproductive to providing more Americans with health care because "the pressure on small businesses, because of the mandate, is too great."
Mackey may not have settled on the proper philosophy or political ideology to affix to the nation's new health care law, but his continued criticism is forming a lump in the throat of many customers as they choke down their Annie's Mac & Cheese.
More on Money Now
The health care system in the United States is broken and needs to be completely reformed from top to bottom. Obamacare was not intended to do that and much, much more needs to be done, health care costs in the U.S. have been increasing at twice the rate of inflation for years, and health care costs have quadrupled since 1990.
TRUE. There was never going to be ANY reform without tort reform as the 1st prerequisite, followed by incremental assement of each component affecting costs and care, then appropriate action and corrective approaches.
To throw thousands of pages of health care policy and practices, unread, and slam them down the throats of americans will prove to be the single largest boondoggle in U. S. history and, I believe, will ultimately result in less access, higher costs, and more exemptions to buy votes. No real reform ever allows exemptions, including congress and unions.
I have posted it before. All I need to know about government controlled healthcare is to see an imaging center in NY filled with Europeans, and centers in Chicago and Detroit filled with Canadians having to wait months for a scan, during which time their disease often advances beyond treatment, and due to costs and age, may be denied treatment beyond pain management.
Stock up on pain pills americans.
So, if Obama Care is so GREAT, why didn't Obama, Senate and Congress decide to enforce IT on Gov't officials including themselves?
Instead THEY ALL rack up massive pensions, with little work done and it's ALL OUR money.
OBAMA, lead by example...Oh wait,, no..
It's Do as I say, not as I do. For HIM and Republicans and Democrats in Congress. AND YES, let's penalize business, brilliant.
Obama is a Lazy, Arrogant, Corrupt Imbecile. Anyone that thinks different isn't from Chicago. He was a failed community organizer. His policies are to the left of Marx.
I'm sure when Roosevelt and others proposed Social Security, along with other programs....
We had the same uprising of hate....And hate mongers beating the drums..
I remember as a kid, seeing poor farms....And wondering why ? Why in this Great Nation...??
Most were closed and gone by the time I was in my 20s...
They actually looked like enjoyable places, but I never quite grasped the full ramifications.
It also seemed that they were "somewhat" self supportive, but I'm sure there were Fundings to help maintain them or the buildings, it was a very cheap way to wharehouse a large group of people.
We also had more Insane Asylums or State Mental Institutions...??
Today we have Nursing Homes and Institutions that are owned by the Medical Profession, Doctors and Lawyers along with quite wealthy Investors, Most are private..??
Some cost an individual or a Family as much as a $100,000 per year to live at...Although there are recourses and some of that cost is picked up by our Society.
A $100,000 a year when in fact, that can usually provide for a family of four(4) quite reasonably.
Without going without, except maybe higher learning.
The point being, is most/many Countries that have a Nationalised Healthcare Systems do not incur these types of cost, individuals nor families, along with Governments...
Our HSystems are out of whack, we pay through the nose, even 10X for the same pill others can get for less...Something needs to be done, I don't have the all the answers....
But our systems have run Amok with greed and brought despair to many in our Nation. IMO.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Many drivers don't know what common car warning lights mean, according to a new Insurance.com survey.
- Why GM, Chrysler are riding high
- Can you opt out of Medicare?
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Plans revived for 'floating city' of 50,000 people
- Homeowners insurance: Bountiful coverage for bad cooking
- 3 stocks for the 3-D printing revolution
- Why restaurants are adding tablets to the tables
- America's greatest export is its debt
- True test for Obamacare: Will it make US healthier?
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 has lost ground the last four sessions. That is an attention-grabbing headline, but it loses a little punch when taking into account that the total decline over those four sessions has been 14 points, or 0.8%, following an eight-week advance in which it gained 150 points or 9.1%.
At the moment, the S&P 500 is on course for its fifth straight losing session, yet like the previous four sessions, the losses are fairly modest in scope. Sellers ... More
More Market News
The Street's 'corrective action' made an attractive company that is growing profitability even more appetizing.