And now, the Carnival class-action lawsuit
The filing alleges that the cruise company knew about engine problems before a fire left its Triumph liner stranded for days.
A class-action lawsuit filed by passengers days after the ship was towed to its dock in Mobile, Ala., last week should have been a little easier to foresee.
CNN reported Thursday that Triumph passengers Matt and Melissa Crusan of Oklahoma filed suit on behalf of other passengers earlier this week in federal court. The suit claims that Carnival "knew or should have known that the vessel Triumph was likely to experience mechanical and/or engine issues because of prior similar issues."
Hints of legal trouble appeared before the ship even pulled into port, as a passenger posting on Reddit mentioned Carnival's offer of a compensation package while insisting conditions on the ship described in various reports weren't "nearly as bad as they're talking about." Carnival offered passengers a full refund, a voucher for a future cruise and $500 as compensation for their trouble, but the Crusans' lawyers issued a press release saying they're "committed to obtaining just compensation for the passengers of the Triumph." What's just? That all depends on a passenger's tolerance for the living conditions that the suit describes in revolting detail:
"[Passengers] were forced to sleep on deck and/or in other communal areas on the vessel, relieve themselves into buckets, bags, showers, sinks, were given spoiled or rotting food that was unfit for reasonable safe human consumption, and were generally forced to live in squalid conditions that created a severe risk of injury, illness and/or disease."
Key phrases like "sewage and/or human waste sloshed around the vessel" make the suit great reading material, but aren't what concern the plaintiffs most. The core of the issue is what the cruise line knew and when. The suit alleges that the Triumph experienced engine issues on other cruises as recently as mid-January. Also, the suit claims that, on Jan. 28, another incident damaged the ship's propulsion system and generator.
“Notwithstanding said issues, Carnival knowingly decided to embark on the subject voyage," the suit says.
On Tuesday, the Coast Guard said the fire started when oil leaking from a line running from one of the ship's engines hit a hot surface and caught fire.Carnival spokeswoman Aly Bello-Cabreriza wouldn't comment on current litigation to The Huffington Post, but noted that the Triumph did have electrical issues with its alternator that were repaired by the alternator's supplier on Feb. 2. She added that supplier and an unnamed “third-party verification organization” certified the repairs and that it shouldn't have been an issue on the cruise.
"There is no evidence at this time of any relationship between this previous issue and the fire that occurred on Feb. 10,” the spokeswoman says.
I'm just curious why they didn't send out boats to remove the people from the stranded ship? It might have taken a day or two but would have been better than 5!! sometimes I think these companies are determined to self destruct.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
- Should the US scrap the debt ceiling?
- Will new mortgage rules mean fewer lenders?
- Why GM, Chrysler are riding high
- Survey: Dashboard lights fail to send right message
[BRIEFING.COM] Everyone was waiting for the November employment report all week, and with the major averages all up at least 0.9%, it is pretty clear what the market thought of that report. It liked what it saw, because the data were solid enough to suggest the labor market is certainly improving but not strong enough necessarily to force the Fed's hand into tapering at this month's meeting.
That middle-line view was perhaps best reflected in the Treasury market, which moved higher after ... More
More Market News
The rollout of the new national health care plan has been far from perfect, but some sectors may get an Obamacare bump.