Smoking lounges disappearing from US airports
The tobacco industry objects to the move, saying they have a right to serve their millions of customers.
There's only one public indoor space in the entire state of Colorado where a person can legally smoke cigarettes -- a designated lounge at Denver International Airport. And soon, even that spot will be just a memory.
The airport closed three of its four smoking lounges last year. The final lounge will close for good when its lease expires in 2018.
The news comes less than a month after an air quality study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at five major American airports with smoking lounges. According to the report, limiting smoking to the designated lounges doesn’t eliminate non-smokers’ exposure to second-hand smoke.
Time Magazine reports that in 2011, about 15% of all U.S. air travel took place at the five airports in question: Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport, McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, Denver International and Salt Lake City International Airport.
Still, anti-smoking forces appear to be gaining -- fueled by greater public awareness and a tobacco industry whose marketing practices were tightly reined in by the landmark 1998 settlement that awarded billions of dollars to all 50 U.S. states.
In 2002, only 13 of the nation’s large large-hub airports had smoke-free policies. But the American Nonsmoker’s Rights Foundation says that, as of January 2013, 29 of the nation’s 35 top airports are smoke-free indoors.
Federal law bans smoking on all U.S. domestic and international commercial flights -- but there’s no federal policy requiring airports to be smoke-free.
And some tobacco producers, according to the CDC, "have promoted and paid for separately enclosed and ventilated smoking areas in airports and have opposed efforts to implement smoke-free policies in airports."
The CDC estimates about 20% of people in the U.S., more than 45 million men and women, smoke cigarettes. And the tobacco companies say they have right to serve their consumers.
Philip Morris International (PM), one of the world’s largest tobacco companies, says it agrees the effects of second-hand smoke require some restrictions on smoking in public places, as well as smoking bans in many locations.
However, the company notes, "a balance should be struck. . . between the desire to protect non-smokers, especially minors, from exposure to second-hand smoke, and allowing the millions of people who smoke to do so in some public places."
Last year, British American Tobacco (BTI) defended what it called its right "to engage transparently on issues affecting its legitimate business selling a legal, highly regulated product that many adults choose to use."
And of course there’s the issue of smokers still needing a place to light up, even in a supposedly smoke-free airport.
"It’s been our experience that people will smoke in the public areas if they are not given a [separate] place," Barbara Gann, spokeswoman for Salt Lake City International Airport, recently told the Salt Lake Tribune. "For example, employees and passengers alike will smoke in the public restrooms, or in front of the terminals -- which then causes people to walk through it."
"Smoking is still legal in this country," notes a 2012 Denver Post editorial that questions the closing of the Denver airport's smoking lounges. "Asking smokers to go for hours at a time -- longer if there are delays and layovers involved -- strikes us as punitive."
More on Money Now
Bottom line: Most people in the twenty-first century don't want to be exposed to cigarette smoke, and rightfully so. I know too many people who have died from cigarette-smoking caused disease, including my mom and many of her friends. Not to mention the fact that it just plain STINKS. Seriously, it smells NASTY. I always wonder how someone isn't embarrassed to emit such stench. It really is just as bad as FART effluvium, whether smokers want to admit it or not.
I have always said, and will continue to say, "Smoke all you want, kill yourself if you must, just keep it away from me." Cigarette smoke is, whether anyone will admit it or not, A POISONOUS NUISANCE. I remember in college, they had a smoking lounge, and just walking past it out in the hallway was nasty. I had to tell a couple of friends, "I'm sorry, but I am NOT going in there." They were on their own. And it is true, I have seen way too many inconsiderate smokers flicking their butts out their car windows onto the street--that is LITTER. Like it or not, smokers, if you light up, I'm leaving. I don't care if we're in the middle of doing business or whatever. You light one of your stink bombs and I'm out of there. Smokers don't seem to understand the fact that THEY STINK.
Re-(TOG) to the third power: I've never done any of the things on your "list."
Reiteration: Smokers don't seem to understand the fact that THEY STINK.
PEOPLE WILL GO POSTAL WITHOUT THEIR NICOTINE AND PROBLEMS OF VIOLENCE WILL HAPPEN IN THE AIRPORTS AND ON PLANES.
They mentioned that 20% of the population smokes. I don't know if that includes children, but even if it doesn't, then if all 20% of those people decided to not utilize air travel, then airlines (and ultimately airports) would lose over 25% of their revenue. Personally, I don't fly very often. I choose to drive because I don't have all these regulations that they've put in airports. I can light up whenever I want. I have my choice of what kind of food I want to eat. I don't have to put up with sitting next to someone who hasn't showered in a week. And I don't have to have some guy trying to feel me up every time I get in my car. This is only more of a reason to drive as opposed to flying. The only thing is that the cops out there are more interested in finding people talking on their phone than people doing things that actually endanger the public (i.e. speeding).
How many billons of dollars a year would disappear with out those cigarette smokers the economy would collapse
Oh yeah--lets ALL band together and do something about the 2nd hadd somke that WILL KILL YA!!! --- It WILL EFFECT EVERY FACET OF YOUR LIFE!!!
But ---Marijuana on the other hand is safe, secure, gives you peace of mind, brings new tax dollars, Tr la--tr la--tr la!
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
The pugnacious billionaire mayor reportedly threatened to 'destroy' this NYC industry once out of office. Here are some tips, in case he follows through.
- Yum aims to fatten up by doubling Taco Bell sales
- Oklahoma senators change tune on disaster relief
- At software giant SAP, autism is an asset
- Target blames weather for soggy results
- Chick-fil-A thrown back into gay marriage debate
- Oklahoma tornado losses could top $2 billion
- Apple's stock is slipping, but its brand value isn't
- Meet the class of 2013, the most indebted yet
- Is Abercrombie just for the 'cool kids'?
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 has climbed past its morning rebound high amid relative strength in technology.
The tech sector has crossed into positive territory as major components were able to shake off the early weakness. Apple (AAPL 443.35, +2.00), IBM (IBM 208.28, +1.29), and Cisco Systems (CSCO 23.54, +0.21) are all up between 0.4% and 0.9%.
Also of note, Hewlett-Packard (HPQ 24.12, +2.89) is soaring 13.6% ... More
More Market News
DuPont is downgraded to 'sell,' and Pacific Sunwear is upgraded to 'buy.'