Smoking lounges disappearing from US airports

The tobacco industry objects to the move, saying they have a right to serve their millions of customers.

By Bruce Kennedy Jan 15, 2013 10:27AM

Credit: JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images
Caption: A 'No Smoking' sign is seen as an United Airlines aircraft prepares to take off from the international airport in San Francisco, CaliforniaThere's only one public indoor space in the entire state of Colorado where a person can legally smoke cigarettes -- a designated lounge at Denver International Airport. And soon, even that spot will be just a memory.


The airport closed three of its four smoking lounges last year. The final lounge will close for good when its lease expires in 2018.


The news comes less than a month after an air quality study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at five major American airports with smoking lounges. According to the report, limiting smoking to the designated lounges doesn’t eliminate non-smokers’ exposure to second-hand smoke.


Time Magazine reports that in 2011, about 15% of all U.S. air travel took place at the five airports in question: Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport, McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, Denver International and Salt Lake City International Airport.


Still, anti-smoking forces appear to be gaining -- fueled by greater public awareness and a tobacco industry whose marketing practices were tightly reined in by the landmark 1998 settlement that awarded billions of dollars to all 50 U.S. states.


In 2002, only 13 of the nation’s large large-hub airports had smoke-free policies. But the American Nonsmoker’s Rights Foundation says that, as of January 2013, 29 of the nation’s 35 top airports are smoke-free indoors.


Federal law bans smoking on all U.S. domestic and international commercial flights -- but there’s no federal policy requiring airports to be smoke-free.


And some tobacco producers, according to the CDC, "have promoted and paid for separately enclosed and ventilated smoking areas in airports and have opposed efforts to implement smoke-free policies in airports."


The CDC estimates about 20% of people in the U.S., more than 45 million men and women, smoke cigarettes. And the tobacco companies say they have right to serve their consumers.


Philip Morris International (PM), one of the world’s largest tobacco companies, says it agrees the effects of second-hand smoke require some restrictions on smoking in public places, as well as smoking bans in many locations.


However, the company notes, "a balance should be struck. . . between the desire to protect non-smokers, especially minors, from exposure to second-hand smoke, and allowing the millions of people who smoke to do so in some public places."


Last year, British American Tobacco (BTI) defended what it called its right "to engage transparently on issues affecting its legitimate business selling a legal, highly regulated product that many adults choose to use."


And of course there’s the issue of smokers still needing a place to light up, even in a supposedly smoke-free airport.


"It’s been our experience that people will smoke in the public areas if they are not given a [separate] place," Barbara Gann, spokeswoman for Salt Lake City International Airport, recently told the Salt Lake Tribune. "For example, employees and passengers alike will smoke in the public restrooms, or in front of the terminals ­-- which then causes people to walk through it."


"Smoking is still legal in this country," notes a 2012 Denver Post editorial that questions the closing of the Denver airport's smoking lounges. "Asking smokers to go for hours at a time -- longer if there are delays and layovers involved -- strikes us as punitive."


More on Money Now

381Comments
Jan 15, 2013 12:05PM
avatar
i dont smoke or like to be around it, but it is only fair to have some area in the airport that people can smoke.  Unlike other public buildings, they cannot just go outside and smoke.  They have to go back through security each time they go outside.   It would be like if they didn't have bathrooms on the plane or in the terminal and you had to go back out the front door of the airport each time you had to pee.  If you had a long flight followed by a long layover, you would be very uncomfortable having to hold it.  You can argue that they shouldnt smoke in the first place but they do, and a little room that is sealed off from the rest for them is a reasonable compromise. 
Jan 15, 2013 1:10PM
avatar

Non-smokers have the whole f'g world... we can't have one little room?   Get a life.

Jan 15, 2013 1:50PM
avatar

I quit smoking almost 10 years ago and I have sympathy for smokers. Asking a smoker to go without for any length of time is like asking a non-smoker to abstain from breathing, eating or going to the bathroom. It can't be done. Regardless of how you feel about smokers, the fact is, they are addicted. People who have never smoked don't have a clue.

 

Whiney nonsmokers are ignorant, intolerant, wimpy a-holes who think the world revolves around them.

Jan 15, 2013 1:15PM
avatar
Pretty ridiculous considering the pollution generated by airports is HUGE and Jet fuel is at the top of the list for killer toxic exposure.   What this is a 'feel good' mentality.  They can't do crap to clean up the air so they make themselves feel better by going after a minority, i.e. individuals and blaming them for polluting the air.   It's the same 'too big to fail' attitude that allows the Banks and Wall Street to continue to rip us off while the poor are blamed for the state of the country.

Get on your bikes and ride if you really gave a crap about the air or take a train.  The air pollution caused every time a plane takes off negates the bitch factor regarding cigarette smoke.

Being a Smoke Nazi does not improve anyone's air quality, riding a bike, taking a train and forgoing air travel does.  
Jan 15, 2013 1:38PM
avatar
I am a smoker and I go in and out of security NUMEROUS times just to smoke outside, especially if it is a long layover or cold outside.  I am not alone in this practice.  The extra workers needed to scan and screen the same people over and over makes absolutely no sense to me not to mention the fact that more people going through security increases the chances of someone or something being missed thus increasing terroristic risks to all parties in the airport & airplanes.   Designated smoking areas inside the airport is the only sensible solution or designating an outdoor smoking area accessible only to those parties who have already gone through security.
Jan 15, 2013 1:48PM
avatar

If its in it own little area, not hurting non-smokers, whats the big deal? People just like to bi*ch.

 

Jan 15, 2013 1:16PM
avatar

EVERY SINGLE DAY! More and MORE big brother taketh AWAY!!! BYE BYE FREEDOMS

UNTIL 1 DAY WE JUST CANT TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!

Jan 15, 2013 1:55PM
avatar
Eliminate the bars for the alcoholics, escalators, elevators, automobiles, airplanes, for those too lazy to walk across the country, all the sugar, fizzy drinks, windows for those afraid of heights, etc., etc., etc. candy bars, urinals. All unfair and unhealthy.
Jan 15, 2013 1:31PM
avatar
I always wondered, how much tax money would be lost if we all quit smoking today.  
Jan 15, 2013 1:53PM
avatar
That's just asinine. When I grew up smoking was the in thing with advertisements everywhere. We had a smoker lounge in high school and I even seen people smoking in hospitals. Society caused many older people to start smoking and now they want to treat them like outcasts of society. Screw them, I'll drive!!
Jan 15, 2013 1:22PM
avatar

This Is  America well at least i thought it was

Jan 15, 2013 1:28PM
avatar
Sad comment on our US society: the most intolarant people in the world. We are all the most important person in the room...No wonder mediocraty is our future...  
avatar

This is to everyone who insists that everyone quit smoking and that smoking should be banned around them:

 

If you drive an automobile or ride in a taxi, bus, train or subway or fly on airplanes or if you use heating systems or air conditioning - YOU ARE A TWO FACED JERK. It's all about YOU.

 

The fact is - if you drive an automobile 10 miles you have contaminated the air that I breathe more than I contaminate yours in a year or smoking. And if you use the other items above your contamination is worse than I contribute in a lifetime of smoking.

Jan 15, 2013 1:07PM
avatar
some pussy has found a new allergy...
Jan 15, 2013 1:50PM
avatar
Anybody ever heard of an exhaust fan?
Jan 15, 2013 1:44PM
avatar
Where does Obama smoke if it is illegal in government facilities?
Jan 15, 2013 1:52PM
avatar
I don't smoke, either.  I hate the smell, I hate it when people smoke outside door, but  I agree there should be a place for these people to smoke before they get on the plane.  Even though they stink so badly afterward. I also voted against making bars smoke-free.  But I do like being able to go bowling, now. 
Jan 15, 2013 1:29PM
avatar
I have friends in the airline industry that tell me secrets,,, guess who gets to smoke on the plane behind the cockpit door,,,,,,, give up ????,,,,the folks flying the plane and the folks serving you drinks know how to "fix" the smoke detectors in the cockpit and the bathroom so they can have in-flight smokie treats,,,,, if your a passenger and you disable the smoke detector ya get arrested.   
Jan 15, 2013 1:00PM
avatar
They had one in Washington DC we used to call the " flash cube"- it was a big square glass enclosed room full of smokers, and the smoke was so thick that it resembled one of those old flash cubes after it had gone off.  I don't think people even had to smoke- just walk in and breath.
Jan 15, 2013 2:05PM
avatar

I think its awesome that we live in a world where nobody can do anything without someone's loud mouth having an opinion. If people want to smoke let them chief their little  lungs out. I know there are some people who don't smoke and just can't stand to be around it. Guess what I bet those smokers can't stand to be around you either. We are living in a world that is coming to one group wanting this and the other wanting that. It would be nice if everyone would just shut their mouths and let people live how they want to live. It always has to come down to a side winning in the end you are not only hurting the other side but think about the smokers who would like to do their business where ever they want. You first put them in a box together at the airport and said smoke here, most smokers did with no problems. Then you said well we don't want it in the building go out side so now those people are freezing their butts off , still these people have not been much of a problem. Now you are just going to nix it all together. It is their right to smoke if they please and you are just going to take it away from them. There are more problems in the world than smokers or smoking get it together people and worry about life changing issues.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?

MARKET UPDATE

[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 ran into a wall of resistance shortly after the top of the hour and dipped back to its lows of the morning (which weren't all that low).  The pullback was emblematic of today's session where there simply hasn't been much conviction.

The latter is raising a few eyebrows since there was enough good news this morning (eg., no escalation of geopolitical problems, M&A activity, ISM Index at highest level since March 2011) to power up the market, and yet ... More

MSN MONEY'S