The baseball dugout goes wireless
Major League Baseball is finally getting rid of the corded phones that managers use to connect with the bullpen.
That may soon change, however. The landline phones in baseball dugouts, those technological relics that managers still rely on to make bullpen calls, will soon be disconnected.
Managers will start to look like everyone else at the stadium, gabbing away on 4G smartphones. Major League Baseball has worked out a wireless sponsorship deal with T-Mobile USA to replace those dugout phones with Samsung Galaxy S III phones.
In yet another charming example of baseball's attachment to tradition, MLB never thought to ask for a new phone system even after a decade's worth of discussions with wireless carriers about sponsorships, The New York Times reported. But finally, the sport is moving into the 21st century.
"This is baseball's continued push into the digital age," said MLB executive Tim Brosnan, according to the Times.
But, in fitting momentum for a sport that still uses manual scoreboards in some parks, the rollout of the new technology will be slow. It's still unclear if each stadium will have wireless phones this year.
One key question for managers is whether the new T-Mobile phones will be as reliable as their corded ancestors. Any mobile phone user can tell you about disappearing bars and dropped connections. The last thing baseball wants is Jim Leyland screaming obscenities at his T-Mobile phone at a crucial point in the game.
There will be new rules governing the use of those phones, too, the Times reported. For example, managers won't be allowed to call the bullpen from the pitcher's mound. And it's probably best to stay away from "Angry Birds" during the game.
More on Money Now
As American as baseball, apple pie & SAMSUNG!?
DOH! Didnt think that one through! Too bad Apple you woulda fit right into the theme.
Those are usually just intercom type calls that are usually secure lines...?
Now if they go wireless,.......Anyone could listen in..
What ever that was all about ??
Wendy hasn't been hot or juicy for quite awhile.
She's getting pretty old..
The problem is actually that government is not involved ENOUGH in health care. Obamacare is a middle-of-the-road solution that is not perfect. Health care for ALL citizens should be provided 100% by the government. We should not be asking employers to have to make these decisions (i.e., cut hours to avoud having to pay for employees' health care). A small VAT or a small increase in income tax would pay for it.
Alternatively, if the political necessity is to have the costs paid for by employers, then still EVERYONE in the country, working or not, should be covered, and it should be paid for based upon a fee for each payroll hour accrued at a company. That way employers would not have an arbitrary cut-off figure (like 30 hours) which they could manipulate. If your business requries 1,000 man hours per month, and there is a health care cost factor of $2.00 per manhour, then the employer pays $2,000 per month regardless of whether those 1,000 hours are wored by 5 people (200 hours/month/employee) or 20 people (50 hours/month/employee).
This information was pulled from PAPA JOHNS website; http://ir.papajohns.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=650372
People the problem is greed. A company's NET profit is 12-16million per quarter, yet they don't want to contribute better health benefits for Americans. Might I add Americans that eat their unhealthy, sodium, preservative loaded 10,000 calorie pizzas, which intern causes health problems.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
More than 70 percent of the Class of 2012 took out loans. Oh, and they're seeing high unemployment, too.
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
- Should the US scrap the debt ceiling?
- Will new mortgage rules mean fewer lenders?
- Why GM, Chrysler are riding high
- Survey: Dashboard lights fail to send right message
- Can you opt out of Medicare?
[BRIEFING.COM] S&P futures vs fair value: +7.30. Nasdaq futures vs fair value: +13.50. U.S. equity futures are exhibiting a bullish bias ahead of the November employment report at 08:30 a.m. ET. The S&P futures are currently trading 0.4% above fair value, positioning the cash market for a noticeably higher start. Given the market-moving potential of the employment report, however, the current indication is not one that can be taken fully for granted at this time. ... More
More Market News
The retailer labels the character's fake memoir as non-fiction. This comes weeks after it categorized the the Bible as fiction.