Amazon buys Goodreads, but for how much?

Bloomberg pegs the deal at close to $1 billion, while the AllThingsD site estimates it as $200 million at most.

By Jonathan Berr Mar 29, 2013 4:28PM
Amazon.com logo © Spencer Platt/Getty ImagesAmazon.com (AMZN) has acquired Goodreads, a social media site for book lovers, for either a shocking amount of money or a pretty good deal, depending on which news report you read.

Bloomberg Businessweek estimates that Amazon paid "close to, but not quite, $1 billion" for the site while Kara Swisher of the AllThingsD blog pegs the acquisition price at about $150 million, or up to $200 million when factoring in potential incentive payments.

Seeing such a huge difference in price of a potential deal is strange considering that news about mergers and acquisitions often is leaked with the precision of a Swiss watch. Media sites rarely differ much on the price.

The Businessweek article is speculative, basing the Goodreads price on the value of LinkedIn (LNKD), a publicly traded company with 202 million active accounts valued by investors at $95 per user. Based on recent financing rounds, Facebook's (FB) running value is $58 per user, while Pinterest and Twitter are valued at about $50 a head, the article says.

"Working with that range, Goodreads’ 16 million users at $55 each would add up to a sticker price of $880 million," Businessweek says. "Of course, that’s an overly simple, back-of-the-envelope estimate. Any decent I-banker would try to push that valuation on two fronts: the growth rate of the network and its potential for monetization."


Swisher, a veteran tech journalist, sees things much differently, saying the Businessweek figure is simply wrong. "I did actual reporting with seven excellent sources," she told MSN Money in an email. She said she wasn't sure how much of the deal was in cash and stock, though her sources say most of it was cash.


Amazon, the largest e-commerce company, didn't disclose the price and couldn't be reached for comment. Efforts to reach Kyle Stock, the Businessweek reporter who wrote the article, were unsuccessful.

--Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr

More on moneyNOW



3Comments
Mar 29, 2013 8:14PM
avatar
Corporate morality starts at the top.  If the COB and CEO are lacking and turning a blind eye to what's happening and how their customers are being treated then it becomes systemic.  However, the customer always has the power... it might be inconvenient, but stop doing business with them.  If a couple of million people leave, they might change.
Mar 29, 2013 7:25PM
avatar
too far gone. i'm moving to new zealand.

avatar
Bank of America took over the bank that was providing my Visa Card for 30 years and service went straight downhill.
I will never do business with them again. I had hoped they would go down in 2008 -- they certainly deserved to. Hate to
have a bank named "B of AMERICA"!

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?

MARKET UPDATE

[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market continues to struggle to find direction.  The major indices are mixed with the Nasdaq drawing its main sponsorship from Apple (AAPL 103.16, +0.66), which is trading right through reports its iCloud service was hacked.

Otherwise, today's prominent price action has been reserved for the commodity and Treasury markets, both of which have looked weak since the get go and neither of which have shown any effort to reverse the negative pricing tide ... More

MSN MONEY'S