Visit your parents -- or get sued by them
China cracks down on adult children who may be neglecting or possibly abusing their elderly parents.
The national legislature there is now requiring that adult children visit their parents often. Otherwise, elderly parents who feel ignored can sue their kids. Wow, dinner conversations must be pretty awkward in that scenario.
The law is partly a reflection of a cultural change in parts of the developing country. The traditional extended family in China is fading, according to the Associated Press. Historically in many Asian cultures, aging parents and grandparents live with a child or other family member. Sending a parent to a nursing home was just not acceptable -- nor was it affordable for many families.
But that's changing, particularly as China's elderly population rapidly expands. Lately, the Chinese government has seen a growing number of reports of elder abuse. State media carried the story of one son in the well-to-do province of Jiangsu who reportedly forced his elderly mother to live in a pig pen for two years, according to the AP.
Elder-abuse cases in Hong Kong have risen 15% in the last two years, the South China Morning Post reported earlier this year. "Because of Chinese culture, elderly people are reluctant to reveal the disgraceful affairs of their families," the director of one advocacy group, Against Elderly Abuse, told the newspaper.
The new law doesn't say how often children must visit their parents -- and there may not be enough grounds here for any resulting lawsuit. But China now has nearly 167 million people over age 60, the BBC reports. While the law is partially intended to sustain the family unity that may be starting to fray in China, it's also an attempt to ensure that the oldest and weakest members of society are cared for.
More from Money Now
- Drug companies battle meth scourge
- The market's winners and losers of 2012
- Should stranded adventurers pay for own rescue?
As an old person , I love the idea of it ! But seriously ?
If you raised your children correctly, then this isnt necessary .
But todays standards are slipping away, selfish children grow up into selfish adults.
Suit will not change that. Its too bad tho.
I'd like to see some sort of opt out for children who were abused by their parents. Forcing them to not only provide for them if necessary, but to actually visit them, must be he** and makes it impossible to move on and heal from your past.
When I was a young sailor I was called into the squadron commanders office and reamed up one side and down the other about not writing home. Now that I'm a great grandpa I realize how much that meant to my parents.
How sad that their has to be a law. Maybe there should be one here in the United States. Many of my friends are neglected by their adult children, including myself. I've talked to mine about it, but nothing changed. I don't ever ask for their help or complain about my health, I don't want to be a burden. I know when my mother was alive, we talked
almost everyday, I loved her so very much, I just couldn't imagine being so distant. Life is short...
OK. I.m not trivializing the state of the senior citizens, but this article is atrocious. It bounces from a law requiring adult children to visit their parents; to an increase in the abuse/neglect of the elderly; back to the law requiring visitation - as if, somehow, those issues are related.
If there is a correlation, perhaps the senior citizens don't want their children around.
EDIT: Oh, and I can just visualize the think-tank of lawyers that come up with this:
"Hey, I need a bigger boat."
Yea, me too."
"Who can we sue?"
"Hey, there are a lot of senior citizens in nursing homes; let's sue their kids for not visiting them."
"Great idea! AND lets throw in the term 'enough' so that no matter how often they do visit - we'll say it's NOT 'enough'".
China leads the way! Great idea; don't let the family-values of American "exceptionalism" infect and destroy your country.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
The fraudster says he's making $40 a month -- about the same as Bangladesh garment workers.
- Motor home sales rise in hopeful economic sign
- Mike Bloomberg: Skip college, become a plumber
- Will Yahoo ruin Tumblr?
- Some customers ashamed of their McDonald's bags
- Obamacare could bring more Band-Aid coverage
- Taxpayers won't win on General Motors shares
- Are hipsters hiking Pabst Blue Ribbon prices?
- 8 things about Tumblr's young, rich founder
- Stephen King's latest book sticks to print
[BRIEFING.COM] The Russell 2000 crosssed the 1,000 level for the first time ever today and the S&P 500 established a new all-time, intraday high. Those were some of the more memorable highlights of what was an otherwise nondescript day of trading.
By and large, there just wasn't a lot of conviction on the part of either buyers or sellers. The major indices spent time on either side of the unchanged line, but never put a whole lot of distance between themselves and ... More
More Market News
When it comes to efficiency gains, a watt saved is a watt earned.