Dunkin' takes shot at modifying Obamacare
The company is lobbying the government to narrow the Affordable Care Act's definition of 'full time,' which would mean fewer employees for it insure.
The question of who counts as a full-time worker is coming under fire from Dunkin' Brands (DNKN), which wants the government to narrow its definition under Obamacare. That's because it wants to avoid paying health insurance for Dunkin' Donuts employees who work as little as 30 hours a week.
Dunkin' Brands is lobbying the government to change the U.S. Affordable Care Act's definition of "full-time" to employees working at least 40 hours a week, instead of the 30 hours currently written into the law, Chief Executive Nigel Travis told the Financial Times.
The latest volley from an iconic U.S. business comes as the ACA is set to go into effect next year. The law will require employers with 50 or more full-time employees (30 hours or more) to offer those workers "minimum essential" healthcare insurance.
Dunkin' Brands, which also owns Baskin-Robbins, operates on a franchise model. The parent company, excluding workers at its company-owned restaurants, employed more than 1,120 people at the end of 2011, according to its annual report.
But the real benefit would likely go to Dunkin's franchisees, who operate more than 10,000 Dunkin' Donuts locations and almost 7,000 Baskin-Robbins restaurants.
Other big businesses are lashing out at the costs of the plan. Supermarket chain Kroger (KR) told the FT that some companies might decide to pay the government-mandated penalty for failing to insure employees simply because it's cheaper than buying insurance.
Small-business owners are also reacting. As previously reported by MSN moneyNOW, one Wendy's franchise in Nebraska is cutting back the hours of non-management employees to avoid paying health benefits. The local franchise vice president said his company couldn't afford to pay for health insurance and instead is cutting hours of about 100 Wendy's workers.
Other businesses are keeping their employee count under 50, the FT notes.
The average cost to employers of providing insurance for a single worker is $4,664 and $11,329 for a family, the FT notes, citing the Kaiser Family Foundation. The penalty for not insuring employees under Obamacare, meanwhile, is $2,000 per worker.
"If you look through the economics of the penalty the companies pay versus the cost to provide coverage, the penalty's too low, or the cost of coverage is too high, or the combination is wrong," Kroger Chief Executive David Dillon told the newspaper.
This is only ONE isssue from a 2000+page bill, largely unread, that has already generated 13,000 pages of regulation and is expected to generate 13 new govt agencies with 130/000 employees, plus additional IRS agents for enforcement. You aint seen nothing yet.
Few are taliking about the patient outcome penalties and incentives for hospitals where the real incentives are for the hospital not to readmit after a stay to maximize their ratng and reimbursments.
Hello medicine by Marx.
The average cost to employers of providing insurance for a single worker is $4,664 and $11,329 for a family, the FT notes, citing the Kaiser Family Foundation. The penalty for not insuring employees under Obamacare, meanwhile, is $2,000 per worker. < Any of you Liberals just read that in the article. This will destroy business, not just Duncan Donuts, but many, many businesses with over 50 employess. You will see massive layoffs and the majority of the workforce hours cut to under 30. Not many businesses can sustain this massive cost coming down pipeline. Obamacare is nothing more than a Government takover of 1/8 of our economy! I know you Liberals think this is just wonderful, but profits are what is used to create more jobs and open more businesses. Please use your brains. Please take care of yourselves and dont rely on the Nanny state to do it for you!
It is always boil down to the basic question: where is the money for a great idea. Obama, having no interest in economy, just don't care the basic question. He just want to do good.
These businesses want to go to 40 hours so they can avoid hiring full time employees to avoid paying for health insurance. They already are making well enough money to afford healthcare. Greed. My advice to them is to cut back on part time workers and hire full time. For years many unethical greedy companies hired part time and contingent employees when these people want full time. Do they not realize these people need to spend money filling their tanks getting to work, feeding their families or making a payment on the home so they can have a place to live. Maybe these companies are one of the reasons for the housing failure. People couldn't get full time.
Second, it's obvious that Dunkin Donuts (and Papa Johns, and others of their ilk) don't care about the health of their employees, because they are not currently providing heath insurance. If they did, this wouldn't be an issue. So now they will cut people's hours so they can continue to NOT pay them insurance.
I'd rather see Dunkin Donuts raise the price of coffee by $0.25, or Papa John's raise the price of a pizza by $0.14, and know their employees are taken care of...
Oh yeah, all the Obama haters come out of from under the GOP rocks to blast him and the ACA. I love the teapartiers who shove posters around---"Keep Big Guvment Hands off my Medicare", etc. What a pack of rocket surgeons. At over 70 I'm still working full time by choice and I like the ACA future....sure, I am biased as a third generation southern Calif. liberal Democrat. As an army vet (W. Germany, early 60s) I have had great care at the VA-San Diego. I know how expensive and complicated medical care is vs. yrs. ago when my pop could pay the monthly premiums for Blue Cross comprehensive/catastrophic coverage for himself and mother. Both were asthmatics. He once spent a week in the very posh La Jolla Scripps Clinic looking down at a beach in '69 with everything covered--pvt. room, great meals, great care.
If this successful franchise cannot fork over a few dollars to insure its employees,
then I will stop patronizing them.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
While incompetent bosses like Michael Scott and Andy Bernard typically can’t survive in the workplace, office romances are a very real part of corporate culture.
- Southwest Airlines turns less legroom into $773M
- 'American Idol' gets sorry ratings for season finale
- Powerball's wacky sense of humor
- Millions of Facebook's users are actually pets
- Can crowd funding rescue the LA Times?
- Domino's debuts a DVD that smells like pizza
- Average US retirement age climbs to 61
- McDonald's aims to slim down its 145-item menu
- Bathroom reading goes digital with iPad TP stand
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 ended this week with a bang, roaring to a new all-time high on the back of stronger-than-expected economic data, influential leadership, and an ongoing appreciation for the Fed's monetary policy support.
The bullish bias was evident in premarket action as the S&P futures pointed to a higher start without the benefit of any definitive news catalyst. Stocks indeed benefited from a blast of buying interest at the opening bell on this ... More
More Market News
All hail the bull market, which ended the week with a big rally. But it also is starting to look a little like 1987, which suffered an epic blow-out.