Get ready for a meat shortage

The Agriculture Department warns that the looming budget sequester could idle federal inspectors of meat and poultry plants for two weeks.

By Aimee Picchi Feb 20, 2013 2:31PM

Packaged ground beef (© Frank Bean/Uppercut RF/Getty Images)It's something shoppers don't give a lot of attention to when buying hamburger or chicken breasts: the little circle that verifies the meat has been inspected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. But without that stamp, meat can't be sold by packers and processors.


That's bad news because the looming U.S. government sequester means meat and poultry plants won't be able to receive their inspections, potentially leading to a shortage of everything from prime rib to chicken wings.


The sequester -- slated for March 1, unless Congress finds a way to sidestep the start of $85 billion in mandated federal budget cuts -- would keep meat inspection personnel from going to work for as many as 15 days, according to a letter from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack that the U.S. Department of Agriculture released and was reported by Reuters.


Such a "nationwide shutdown of meat and poultry plants during a furlough of (meat) inspection personnel" could lead to $10 billion in production losses, Vilsack wrote. 


Meat and poultry industry groups are alarmed at the prospect, with organizations such as the Poultry Federation and the National Cattlemen's Beef Association sending a letter to Vilsack earlier this month. 


Their letter, which asks that the USDA avoid furloughing its inspectors, notes the shutdown would have wide-ranging effects. 


"Farmers raising livestock and poultry would have nowhere to send their animals and would have to shoulder substantial losses," it reads. "And, most alarming, American consumers could face their first widespread shortage of meat, poultry, and egg products in generations."


Vilsack didn't say when the furloughs would begin, although he told USDA employees earlier this month they'd get at least 30 days notice, according to Reuters. 


Meat production isn't all that would be affected. Other layoffs by the Agriculture Department would mean 600,000 low-income women and infants would be cut from the WIC program, which supplies food and nutritional education, Reuters notes. About 9 million pregnant women, new moms and their children use the program.


The Forest Service would also close 670 of its 19,000 recreation sites, probably during spring and summer, and cut 35 workers from its law enforcement force. 


More on moneyNOW

307Comments
Feb 20, 2013 5:39PM
avatar
Good thing I cut down on my 'meat'.  With all the crap these animals are being injected with and their non sanitary living conditions, how many people are sure that it's actually 'meat' they are eating these days???   No loss for me, yuck!
Feb 20, 2013 5:39PM
avatar
Does the government actually think we are that "stupid"???  There is still going to be $$ going to these divisions of the government - BUT - they won't be getting an increase in their budget!!  So how does that effect the inspectors etc. from doing their jobs?  The so called cuts only means that they won't get the increase that they want!  When it comes to budget cuts they should start with their own salaries, benefits, pensions and health care etc.  I still haven't figured out how "an employee (government worker) gets paid better and has benefits that their employers don't have (the taxpayers of this country)?? Doesn't it amaze you that they govern themselves when "we the people" should be the ones who decide what they get in salaries, perks, pension, health care etc.  When they leave office they should have to purchase their own health insurance just like the rest of us.  Also there should be a 2 year term limit on these people just like the presidents - NO MORE career politicians!!!  When they leave office they should go back to the private sector job market and NOT be allowed to join up with a Lobbying group.  Employee dictating and ruling the Employer (us)!!!  There should be a movement started to correct this flawed system.
Feb 20, 2013 5:39PM
avatar

I have a freezer full of venison.

 

Feb 20, 2013 5:35PM
avatar
After the realization that they are using animal steroids to produce mor muscle in meat with the side effect of less or no flavor who wants it anyway. i buy my beef from a local slaughter house who raise their own natural fed beef. make my own burger etc. trouble is his prices reflect the average and rightly so it will cost more as the private sector comes up with another excuse to break it off in the public. Remember republicans say corporations are the same as people...
Feb 20, 2013 5:34PM
avatar
Just like a reality TV show. The sky is falling, the sky is falling....just then, at the last minute, a deal is reached and life goes on as normal. Nothing wrong with the public getting healthier by not eating flesh anyway for a while. They may find they feel better.
Feb 20, 2013 5:33PM
avatar
Lets start another shortage,sugar, oil, bacon what next week....i know Politian's
Feb 20, 2013 5:31PM
avatar
Let's see, cut 85 billion from the federal budget or eat a little less meat. Too bad it can't be 85 trillion. I say fire the whole damn lot of them and lets buy meat from the farmer and eat all we want!
Feb 20, 2013 5:30PM
avatar
By the way whats wrong with horse meat?
Feb 20, 2013 5:29PM
avatar
Don't care, not worried. I don't think the government will go through with the sequester, I think they'll just end up kicking the can down the road just like they always do.
Feb 20, 2013 5:25PM
avatar
I actually had a recent discussion with someone about deficit spending. Their argument was that there does not need to be a relationship between tax revenue and government spending. The US is a soverign issuer of currency and thus can and should print money at will.

My response to him was, "Great, why tax at all then? If there is no relationship between income and spending then why not just cut income to zero and monetize the whole thing by printing whatever you need?"

He had no answer because his idea is complete crap. There is a relationship. The Sequester is a tiny step to actually cutting some spending. Tiny. Spread to a broad base of Americans from people who own stuff to people who rely on a draw check every month. And all of us in between. This is how cuts have to happen to work.
Feb 20, 2013 5:25PM
avatar

Me again, there are hundreds of horses up in the high deserts that can be processed  and we will not have to put all those government employes on welfare

Feb 20, 2013 5:25PM
avatar
If you'll notice...the cheap food they are giving away (practically) is high carb food?  Most people are cutting it out of their diets and companies like General Mills, Nestle (the largest in the world) suffer losses and many huge food producers like ADM and Cargill will benefit fromthe scarcity and high prices in both commodity sales and beef scarcity which raises prices.  O'Bummer is the fascist corporate whore who panders to them all at the expense of "the people"...look at GE and all the manipulation and subsidies that drive you to their products...ethenol and cornsweeteners from ADM and Cargill...watch Keystone get built for the oil cartel (Condi Rice...the Bush energy dynasty folks etc)
Feb 20, 2013 5:23PM
avatar
Don't panic people!  There is another great source of protein called seafood.  Go to your local fish market and get some today.
Feb 20, 2013 5:21PM
Feb 20, 2013 5:17PM
avatar
I hunt and fish and have plenty of high quality meet, poultry and pork. I even have my own water well, fruit trees and veggies. All on my own property. So I could care fricken less. You bunch of fools that depend on the government for everything. You will be the ones that suffer first then try to take what does not belong to you when you are desperate. 
Feb 20, 2013 5:16PM
avatar
For those who are still eating fish and think that's a good thing when "meat" gets scarce?  Remember they put "dispersents" in the ocean for the BP oil debacle.  I will never eat fish or sea food again...ever!  The studies they are doing (privately) suggest "problems" for those who continue to eat sea food...I loved shrimp...RATS!!
Feb 20, 2013 5:15PM
avatar

I don't think the amount is at risk only the quality due to too many chemicals injected into the animal and too many chemicals hybrid into their foods!

 

THus is Meat Looming no, but the quality sure is!

Feb 20, 2013 5:12PM
avatar
On reading the article, I thought for sure it was going to be about the global population boom, and how, with decreasing farmland, we can't possibly feed everyone. Meat will be the first thing to go. It takes 1,600 calories of grain to produce 100 calories of beef. And that's not to mention the water required. With prices going up on everything, my family has had little choice but to adopt a grain and vegetable heavy diet.
Feb 20, 2013 5:12PM
avatar
I have an idea for the White House. This is simple ABSOLUTELY NO FUNDING and COMPLETE BAN on Horse Slaughter that way NO money Goes out to an absolutely unnecessary slaughter industry and ONLY goes to cattle and chickens and then we have to not worry about it anymore. Why stretch funds for something 80 percent of the American Population does NOT WANT. I read all the facts from the USDA and it states the USA only had an overpopulation increase of horses per year of 388 animals. To MEXICO slaughter this week alone we had 13,000 horses cross the borders in one week we eliminated the over population of horses! plus some. Every week 13,000 animals go to die-and the government says they cant afford to watch and govern is they are safe when they die. WE are now looking at government restrictions of meat supplies with REAL beef and Chicken and this is supposed to scare us into accepting horses for meat in Amercia, of course, do you people really believe the garbage that they keep throwing at us? I have had a petition against the slaughter of horses on the White House web page and asked people to sign-I have received hundreds of messages stating it WILL NOT let them sign in and I divert them to another page to sign and it works! ISnt it amazing how the government that promised not to slaughter horses is allowing it to happen again, went back on its words. Also its states horse prices went down 5 percent only 5 percent? IS this just a gigantic scam the government is perpatrating to let people like Dave Duquette and yes Government official Sue Wallis who is trouble with the law kill horses for money while they kill us with their drugs. If you believe the lies the government says about the lack of funding for cattle and chickens and we will starve to death in two weeks time I got land in the middle of the ocean I would to sell you! Sign At Change.Org Petition to Overturn the The Ban on the Slaughter of Horses for Human Consumption. This head line finally just made me angry! I will NOT take NO for an answer horses are not food!
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?

MARKET UPDATE

[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the midweek session on a mixed note. Blue chip listings bolstered the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.4%) and S&P 500 (+0.3%), while the Russell 2000 (-0.4%) and Nasdaq Composite (-0.02%) underperformed.

Equity indices began the day in the red, but wasted no time regaining their flat lines. Small-cap stocks were not as fortunate as the Russell 2000 spent the day in the red.

Upon returning into positive territory, the key indices were ... More

MSN MONEY'S