Toyota Camry crushed by new crash test
The best-selling car in America and the Prius wagon received the worst safety score an auto safety group had to offer.
The Toyota (TM) Camry looks secure enough with its 5-star government safety rating, but viewed from another angle it seems far more dangerous.
For the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, that angle hits a small part of the bumper on the driver's side at 40 miles per hour. It's what separates the institute's "small overlap" front crash test from the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration's tests that use 40% of a vehicle's front bumper. It's also the Camry's weakness.
The test earned both the Camry and Toyota's Prius V wagon "poor" ratings from the IIHS, which is financed by the U.S. insurance industry. While the two vehicles still received the group's Top Safety Pick award for their performance in more standard front, rear and side impact test, the new test recreates the crash responsible for a quarter of serious or fatal frontal crashes nationwide.
"With this new test, the Institute has raised the bar again and we will respond to this challenge as we design new vehicles," Toyota said in a statement.
It's a diplomatic response from a company that's been continually battered by this test in 2012. Back in August, Toyota's Lexus ES and IS brands flunked in similar fashion and received the test's worst rating. At least then it was in some pretty good company, as the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and Audi A4 also failed. Only Honda's (HMC) Acura TL and Volvo's S60 earned the test's best ratings.
Mercedes was somewhat less taken with the results than Toyota.
"As a leader in automotive safety, we have full confidence in the protection that the C-Class affords its occupants -- and less confidence in any test that doesn't reflect that," it said in a statement at the time.
The more than 373,000 Camrys sold in the U.S. so far this year outnumber the sales of all other cars and are second only to the Ford F-Series truck, which has the Camry beat by more than 200,000 vehicles. The IIHS crash test is still a concern, however, as the four-door sedan version of the rival Honda Accord was one of only two cars to score a "good" rating, the institute's best. The other "good" car, the Suzuki Kizashi, only sold 500 models in November compared to more than 25,000 apiece for the Camry and Accord and won't be sold here next year after bankrupt Suzuki leaves the U.S. market.
Many of the other cars in the test -- including the two-door Accord coupe, the Ford (F) Fusion sedan, Kia Optima, Nissan (NSANY) Altima and Maxima, Subaru Legacy and Outback, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler 200, Mazda6 and Volkswagen Passat -- were considered "acceptable." The Hyundai Sonata, Chevrolet Malibu and Volkswagen (VLKAF) Jetta sedan were only somewhat better than the Camry and Prius V, earning a second-worst "marginal" rating.
Just in case drivers are wondering how much damage a "poor" car takes during this test, the Camry's front wheel was pushed back so far that it bent the passenger compartment footwell inward. It also pushed the whole steering column so far to the right so that the airbag in the steering wheel did almost nothing to protect the crash dummy's head. Side curtain airbags could have helped, if they extended far forward a bit more. The Prius V had similar results, though late deployment rendered airbags almost useless.
"Toyota engineers have a lot of work to do to match the performance of their competitors," Institute president Adrian Lund said in a statement.
Coming off an accelerator-related safety recall two years ago that decimated sales and an earthquake and tsunami in Japan last year that cut supply, Toyota likely won't put off that work for long.
More from Top Stocks
So now ONCE AGAIN, Americans can realize they are driving TIN CANS like they always were...
Keep betting your life on it, along with SUV rollovers.
I'll drag out the old saw....." It runs like a toy ought to..."
"Best selling car" still doesn't sell nearly as much as the "best selling vehicle", the Ford F150.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Tired of constantly dying batteries, she came up with a device that could revolutionize energy storage -- and won $50,000 from Intel.
- Detroit in hot water over proposal to sell art
- Sears spirals toward oblivion
- Why aren't heads rolling at the IRS?
- Do we pay attention to roads and bridges now?
- Yahoo may be going after Hulu
- Apple's first computer could fetch $450,000
- AT&T adds sneaky fee onto its wireless bills
- Soaring ER use adds more pain to health costs
- Netflix gets 'Arrested Development' stars cheap
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News