Rocketing to Mars in 30 days -- rather than 4 years?
Researchers say their fusion-powered engine that could safely speed a human expedition to the Red Planet. Skeptics say no way.
Can space travel ever become cost-efficient? It certainly has never been cheap. The recently ended U.S. space shuttle program, even with its reusable spacecraft, still cost about $1.5 billion per flight, according to an analysis quoted by Space.com. And NASA estimates that the cost of just launching a spacecraft to Mars, using currently available chemical rocket fuel, would run more than $12 billion.
But University of Washington researchers, along with scientists at a private Washington state company, say they've come up with a fusion-powered rocket that, according to a press release, would "clear many of the hurdles that block deep space travel, including long times in transit, exorbitant costs and health risks."
In theory, a fusion-driven rocket uses magnetism to compress special metal bands around a deuterium-tritium fuel pellet -- which in turn starts the powerful fusion process.
And the researchers say compared with the more than four years NASA estimates it would take a human expedition to get from Earth to Mars using today's technology, a fusion-powered rocket could make that same trip in 30 to 90 days. The team's work was funded by NASA's Innovative Advanced Concepts Program and has been selected to get a second round of funding.
But a lot of experts remain very skeptical about the possibility of a fusion-driven rocket trip to Mars.
"I have a hard time buying these claims while we struggle to make fusion viable in the Earth-based lab," said Peter Delamere, an associate professor of physics at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, in an email to MSN Money.
"That is, the lab-based fusion reactions require more input energy than energy output," he added. "Not until we find a way of getting more out than we put in will fusion be a viable energy resource."
However, the researchers in Washington state are betting that their plans for a fusion-powered rocket will create the powerful energy source needed to turn the science fiction of interplanetary travel into fact.
"We hope we can interest the world with the fact that fusion isn't always 40 years away," said lead researcher John Slough, "and doesn’t always cost $2 billion."
An explosion? Oh my gosh are you really that stupid to think that lighting a solid fuel rocket is anything but and explosion. Have you never watched the old video's of rocket trials and seen the rockets blow up? or what about the shuttle that exploded, what caused that a wind gust? No it EXPLODED
Thats as dumb as people thinking that hydrogen is dangerous as a fuel but gas isn't.
I may be wrong, but if you time a launch to Mars during inferior conjunction with planet Earth it wouldn't take 4 years to get there. During Mars/Earth inferior conjunction you could probably get there in 6 months. Perhaps the NASA estimate is that it would be a mission 4 years in duration.
Also, I find a curious lack of earth physics and astro-physics details in this dream article.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
[BRIEFING.COM] Equity indices continue drifting near their recent levels with the S&P 500 (+0.1%) showing a slim gain, while the Russell 2000 (+0.6%) remains near its session high.
Not much has changed among the ten sectors with materials (+0.6%) and industrials (+0.5%) remaining ahead of their peers. The industrial sector has continued drawing support from transports as evidenced by a 1.0% gain for the Dow Jones Transportation Average.
However, the solid gain masks the ... More
More Market News
Investors should note whether this phrase gets dropped from the Federal Reserve's policy statement after its September meeting.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'