1-in-3 chance of going over fiscal cliff, expert says
The chief economist at UBS makes a gloomy prediction. But investors should take these forecasts with a healthy degree of skepticism.
"The risks are quite high indeed," said UBS chief economist Larry Hatheway in an interview Thursday on CNBC. He placed the odds of a fiscal cliff at "greater than a 1-in-3 chance," adding that "I don't think the markets have any concept of that."
Hatheway's prognostication is far gloomier than the views espoused by economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal, who placed the odds of the fiscal cliff happening at 17% in October. In July, UBS put the odds of the fiscal cliff having its "full theoretical impact" at less than 5%, according to Business Insider.
People should be worried about the fiscal cliff, but let's put this in some perspective by examining the odds of other things. Cardiff University pegs the odds of catching a cold in winter at greater than 1 in 4. According to "The Book of Odds," the chances that a driver will get stopped by the police are 1 in 11.48. Conversely, the odds of man dating a supermodel are about 1 in 178,100.
Can anyone say that the odds of Congress failing to avert an unprecedented fiscal calamity -- which may never occur again -- are as much or greater than these events which have happened numerous times in the past and will no doubt reoccur in the future? I am not so sure.
The difference between these predictions and those regarding the fiscal cliff are data. Scientists can make reasonable assumptions about the future based on data of what has happened in the past. They can't "predict the future" because nobody can. People get lots of colds and traffic citations, and a few hearty souls date super models. Even forecasting the weather has gotten better in recent years. None of this applies to the fiscal cliff, which, thank God, is unprecedented. It's close to impossible to calculate the odds of something happening which has never happened before and probably won't happen again.
Perhaps these soothsayers have sophisticated computer models that input every kind of potential variable to examine all the potential outcomes. But even those sophisticated tools have their limits. Take the Gallup Poll, for instance, wrongly predicted that Mitt Romney would win the presidential election. In fact, Nate Silver of The New York Times' FiveThirtyEight blog noted that the firm has had "three poor elections in a row."
Let me reiterate that the fiscal cliff is a bad thing and that Congress must do everything in its power to avert it. But anyone who thinks they can accurately calculate the odds of it happening is full of themselves. Investors shouldn't take these forecasts with a grain of salt. It's more like a truckload.
--Follow Jonathan Berr on Twitter @jdberr
More from Money Now
- Buffett bashes investing 'casino game'
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
The company tries to tamp down criticism from activists who argue that the mascot promotes childhood obesity.
- Oklahoma senators change tune on disaster relief
- At software giant SAP, autism is an asset
- Mike Bloomberg's next career: Taxi magnate?
- Shotgun wedding for Saks and Neiman Marcus?
- Charles Ramsey gets burgers for life, but no Big Macs
- New Jersey bar sting turns up 'swill'
- Mike's Hard Lemonade goes after male drinkers
- Big job gains expected next year, economists say
- Yum aims to fatten up by doubling Taco Bell sales
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages ended modestly lower with the S&P 500 shedding 0.3%.
The benchmark average saw an opening loss of 1.2% after Japan's Nikkei tumbled 7.3%. Japanese stocks sold off amid continued volatility in Japanese Government Bond futures as the 10-yr yield spiked almost 16 basis points to 1.002 before the Bank of Japan's JPY2 trillion liquidity injection caused yields to retrace their gains.
Adding insult to injury was news out of China where the HSBC ... More
More Market News
In the never-ending contest for sales, American carmakers are pulling ahead.