1-in-3 chance of going over fiscal cliff, expert says
The chief economist at UBS makes a gloomy prediction. But investors should take these forecasts with a healthy degree of skepticism.
"The risks are quite high indeed," said UBS chief economist Larry Hatheway in an interview Thursday on CNBC. He placed the odds of a fiscal cliff at "greater than a 1-in-3 chance," adding that "I don't think the markets have any concept of that."
Hatheway's prognostication is far gloomier than the views espoused by economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal, who placed the odds of the fiscal cliff happening at 17% in October. In July, UBS put the odds of the fiscal cliff having its "full theoretical impact" at less than 5%, according to Business Insider.
People should be worried about the fiscal cliff, but let's put this in some perspective by examining the odds of other things. Cardiff University pegs the odds of catching a cold in winter at greater than 1 in 4. According to "The Book of Odds," the chances that a driver will get stopped by the police are 1 in 11.48. Conversely, the odds of man dating a supermodel are about 1 in 178,100.
Can anyone say that the odds of Congress failing to avert an unprecedented fiscal calamity -- which may never occur again -- are as much or greater than these events which have happened numerous times in the past and will no doubt reoccur in the future? I am not so sure.
The difference between these predictions and those regarding the fiscal cliff are data. Scientists can make reasonable assumptions about the future based on data of what has happened in the past. They can't "predict the future" because nobody can. People get lots of colds and traffic citations, and a few hearty souls date super models. Even forecasting the weather has gotten better in recent years. None of this applies to the fiscal cliff, which, thank God, is unprecedented. It's close to impossible to calculate the odds of something happening which has never happened before and probably won't happen again.
Perhaps these soothsayers have sophisticated computer models that input every kind of potential variable to examine all the potential outcomes. But even those sophisticated tools have their limits. Take the Gallup Poll, for instance, wrongly predicted that Mitt Romney would win the presidential election. In fact, Nate Silver of The New York Times' FiveThirtyEight blog noted that the firm has had "three poor elections in a row."
Let me reiterate that the fiscal cliff is a bad thing and that Congress must do everything in its power to avert it. But anyone who thinks they can accurately calculate the odds of it happening is full of themselves. Investors shouldn't take these forecasts with a grain of salt. It's more like a truckload.
--Follow Jonathan Berr on Twitter @jdberr
More from Money Now
- Buffett bashes investing 'casino game'
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Tired of constantly dying batteries, she came up with a device that could revolutionize energy storage -- and won $50,000 from Intel.
- Detroit in hot water over proposal to sell art
- Sears spirals toward oblivion
- Why aren't heads rolling at the IRS?
- Do we pay attention to roads and bridges now?
- Yahoo may be going after Hulu
- Apple's first computer could fetch $450,000
- AT&T adds sneaky fee onto its wireless bills
- Soaring ER use adds more pain to health costs
- Netflix gets 'Arrested Development' stars cheap
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break U.S. stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.