Saudi Prince Alwaleed sues over Forbes' rich list
The billionaire has filed a libel suit claiming the magazine's annual ranking of the world's wealthiest people underestimated his fortune.
The rich aren't like you or me, and in the case of a Saudi prince, that also includes his ego about his sizable fortune.
Saudi Arabia's Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is suing Forbes magazine for libel, claiming the publication's annual rich list underestimated his fortune by $9.6 billion, the U.K.'s Guardian reports.
It's an unusual twist in the history of the Forbes rankings, given that the uber-wealthy are more likely to want to live under the radar. But the feud blew up in March when Prince Alwaleed cried foul over the magazine's most recent rankings. Alwaleed is known for his bets on American companies, including Citigroup (C) and AOL (AOL).
Back then, the prince accused Forbes of using a "flawed" valuation method that, he said, was biased against Middle Eastern investors. Forbes returned the volley with a scathing piece about Prince Alwaleed, claiming the value he placed on his holdings seemed like an "alternate reality."
Now the feud is heading to court. Prince Alwaleed has filed a defamation claim in London against Forbes' publisher, its editor and two of its journalists, The Guardian notes.
In a response to the legal action, Forbes raised a question about the prince's decision to file suit in the U.K., given that the country "has nothing whatsoever to do with our recent story, which raised questions about his claims about his wealth." The publisher added that Forbes stands by it story.
Legal experts said the prince may have a hard time proving his case.
"While I accept that Forbes magazine is published in England and Wales both in hard copy and on the Internet, it is difficult to see why this is the most appropriate forum for the case other than its perceived pro-claimant reputation," Richard Green, a partner at the law firm of Hill Dickinson, told The Guardian.
Prince Alwaleed will also need to prove that the Forbes list caused serious harm to his reputation and serious financial loss.
For the rest of us, the prince's assertion that he's worth $30 billion -- as opposed to Forbes' estimate of $20 billion -- may elicit the sound of the world's smallest violin.
Follow Aimee Picchi on Twitter at @aimeepicchi.
1) Justin Bieber
2) The Jersey Shore idiots
3) This colossal Saudi moron
4) Kanye West
5) The Kardashians
May the fleas of a thousand camels find their way to his wives tent.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
More than 70 percent of the Class of 2012 took out loans. Oh, and they're seeing high unemployment, too.
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
- Should the US scrap the debt ceiling?
- Will new mortgage rules mean fewer lenders?
- Why GM, Chrysler are riding high
- Survey: Dashboard lights fail to send right message
- Can you opt out of Medicare?
[BRIEFING.COM] The drive for five continued today and it was a success. For the fifth straight session, the S&P 500 ended lower. Like the previous four sessions, though, the losses were fairly modest in scope. The S&P 500 declined 0.4%, bringing its total loss for the five sessions to 22 points or 1.2%. All in all, that still qualifies as a pretty tame slide considering the S&P 500 had risen 150 points, or 9.1%, over the previous eight weeks.
Today's ... More
More Market News
The retailer labels the character's fake memoir as non-fiction. This comes weeks after it categorized the the Bible as fiction.