Higher speed limits are gaining steam
Forget 55. Most states have raised their maximum to 70 mph or more. But those increases also mean more accidents.
It was like Prohibition for the lead foots among us, a "noble experiment" that didn't get very far. In 1974, President Richard Nixon put his signature on the National Maximum Speed Law, which reduced the top speed on all U.S. interstates to 55 mph. The law was in response to the 1973 oil embargo, and it was meant rein in fuel consumption.
The NMSL was unpopular right from the start, and after decades of being ignored in many states it was formally repealed in 1995. That's when the regulation of speed limits was handed back to state and local authorities. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 35 states now have speed limits of 70 mph or higher on some portion of their roadway systems -- and that number is expected to rise as state legislatures look at proposals to bring up their local speed limits.
But the need for speed, which supporters say will improve interstate commerce, is also being weighed against concerns about a potential new rise in highway fatality rates.
Earlier this month, the Illinois House of Representatives sent Gov. Pat Quinn a measure to raise the speed limit on the state's non-urban interstate highways from 65 to 70 mph. The bill's champions say Illinois has to remain competitive with neighboring states.
"People steer clear of our roads because it takes them longer to get through" the state, Republican Rep. C.D. Davidsmeyer told the Chicago Tribune. That means "we're not getting the gas revenue, we're not getting people stopping for food, we're not getting a number of other benefits."
Ohio's Department of Transportation, meanwhile, has unveiled new stretches of rural interstate where starting July 1 the speed limit will be increased to 70 mph in an effort to help move freight along more quickly.
Critics, however, say with higher highway speeds come higher accident rates. A study published several years ago in the American Journal of Public Health found the number of injuries and fatalities on rural interstates between 1995 (when the NMSL was repealed) and 2005 increased by 9.1% and by 4% on urban interstates.
There's also a tangible price to pay if Illinois hikes its speed limit: The state's department of transportation says about 900 highway signs that now show a 65-mph maximum will have to be replaced -- at an estimated cost of $200,000.
Raising the speed limit is fine as long as states make the same strict passing laws as in Germany. That is, cars ONLY pass on the left and slower vehicles MUST stay to the right.
The reason why people avoid Illinois is because it is a ****. Useless toll roads, terrible drivers, and way too much traffic. There is nothing that Illinois has that anyone needs.
I drive a stretch of four lane road posted at 65. I'm usually behind a pair racing side by side at 45 to 50 on it. Oh well, until they enforce the laws against that, they can make the speed limit whatever. people are still gonna putz along in the left lane at 50 mph while traffic stacks up behind them.
Oil & gas lobbies are pushing hard for this, because it will burn more gas. Texas limits are going up all over the state... including the rural 2-lane roads. I wouldn't worry so much if we could outlaw texting and talking on cellphones while driving.
If we would treat driving as a huge responsibility and privilege instead of a "constitutional" right and give our student drivers adequate training and education, we would all be safer. Everyone knows about the German Autobahn, but what they don't know is that a a German driver’s license costs about $1500-2000, after a minimum of 25-45 hours of professional instruction plus 12 hours of theory.
One other comment was very true... it's very dangerous to stick to your usual slower speed of 60-65 when everyone else going 70-80, etc!
"People steer clear of our roads because it takes them longer to get through" the state, Republican Rep. C.D. Davidsmeyer told the . That means "we're not getting the gas revenue, we're not getting people stopping for food, we're not getting a number of other benefits."
Other benefits being all of the tolls you have cough up when driving through the flatland?
The biggest problem with crotch rockets....You don't see them coming until they are there..
120mph in 100mph traffic is fine.....But 120 in 65mph traffic...Not a good mix.
And different cars are good at higher speeds, providing you can drive and reflexes, thinking are still at the higher speeds also...?
On our 2,650 mile road trip thru Ca., Az., Wy., Id., Ut. just finished Friday May 24 2013, we found posted Highway speed limits of 65, 70, 75, and in Utah 80 on the best and fastest stretches (slower of course on curves, mountain sections, etc.). Outside of Ca. (where 18-wheelers and vehicles with trailers are limited to 55 even in 70+ speed limit sections) the posted speed limits we saw in Az., Wy., Id., and Ut. applied to all vehicles including 18-wheelers and vehicles with trailers. How odd and unusual it was for us to be cruising at 75 in an 80 posted limit section to have an 18-wheeler pull into the left lane and pass us. We are not used to that!
Oh, would like to mention that outside of Ca. drivers were courteous, generally stayed in the right lane unless passing and generally would move over to let faster vehicles pass (the ones that didn't mostly had Ca. plates). Being from Ca. it is kind of embarrassing.
With rising speed limits come rising insurance costs.
In the mid 1990s Montana did away with speed limits on highways, instead instituting a basic speed law which stated that the "speed limit" was whatever was "reasonable for the existing conditions." This was popular with drivers, and there was no rise in accident rates, but the basic speed law had to be repealed less than 2 years later because as soon as it was passed auto insurance companies hiked rates for all Montana drivers by as much as 100%, pricing insurance out of the market for many drivers. The rise in uninsured drivers was too much for the state government to deal with, so the basic speed law was repealed.
I've had Semis pass me at 75...(they need to have severe limits in bad weather conditions).imo.
But most places, I drive 5-15 over.......Always have.
Distractions such as texting, talking and yes drinking; Are the bigger problems, mostly the first 2.
Even GPS....Some get confused and then cause confusion.
Another is old people that don't know how to drive anymore, or maybe never could...?
There should be stringent test for drivers, starting somewhere between 65-75....?
Like I say many never learned how to drive well, Period.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the Tuesday session on a lower note after generally upbeat earnings took the back seat to geopolitical concerns. The S&P 500 (-0.5%) and Nasdaq Composite (-0.1%) ended on their lows, while the Russell 2000 (+0.3%) displayed relative strength.
Once again, market participants were focused on quarterly reports in the early going, but geopolitical worries overshadowed the impact of mostly better than expected earnings. Specifically, equities ... More
More Market News
After enjoying a smooth rise in stock prices since May, investors are about to be hit with another bout of volatility.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'