Yelp resists request to reveal anonymous reviewers
A company wants to know who said bad things about it that it says are false. The case raises issues that users need to be aware of.
Over Yelp's objections, a court in Alexandria, Va., ordered it last year to provide the information requested by the carpet cleaner, which also alleges that its online critics probably are working for competitors, according to Consumerist. Other reviewers had posted similar complaints about the plaintiff and were not sued.
"Yelp has yet to oblige but has asked the plaintiff to name any reviewers it believes were employed (by) or connected to competitors so that it might investigate," Consumerist says. "However, the carpet cleaner has not taken Yelp up on this offer." A spokesperson for Yelp couldn't be reached for comment.
Despite the threat to users' anonymity, reviewers certainly aren't shying away from Yelp. The site carried more than 39 million reviews in the quarter, and monthly unique visitors jumped by 43% to about 102 million. Yelp shares have surged more than 61% this year as the company, based in San Francisco, reported better-than-expected results in the most recent quarter.
Setting aside a discussion on the merits of the carpet cleaner case, it does underscore how seriously businesses, particularly small ones, take user online user reviews. Consumers have wide latitude in what they can say, but the protection of free speech is not absolute; that was certainly not the intention of the founding fathers.
Some users may not know their limits. For instance, you can say a restaurant's food is bad and its service is slow. But the restaurant has every right to sue people who falsely claim that its kitchen is infested with rats. Yelp makes this very point on its website, where it warns people of the "legal consequences if you post false information."
Companies track consumer reviews very carefully on sites such as Yelp or Angie's List (ANGI) because they're eager to protect their reputations and the integrity of their brands. Understandably, many people post reviews anonymously because they feel more comfortable expressing themselves if their names are left off a review.
"Anonymous and pseudonymous reviews are definitely part of the large review ecosystem today," Reputation.com CEO and founder Michael Fertik said in a statement to MSN Money. He declined to comment on Yelp or this case, but he added, "It is increasingly clear that identified (nonanonymous) reviews carry higher credibility and value for readers."
People should feel free to comment anonymously, but they need to be aware of their actions' potential consequences.
Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] Equity indices closed out the month of August on a modestly higher note. The Russell 2000 (+0.6%) and Nasdaq Composite (+0.5%) finished ahead of the S&P 500 (+0.3%), which extended its August gain to 3.8%. Blue chips lagged with the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) spending the bulk of the session in the red.
The final week of August represented one of the quietest stretches for the stock market so far this year. The first four sessions of the week produced the ... More
More Market News
These hot movers could rise by double digits in coming months.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'