2012's most overpaid bank CEO is . . .
Capital One's Richard Fairbank landed atop a new Bloomberg ranking that considered both compensation and an institution's performance.
After the financial crisis of 2008, some lawmakers and Americans expressed outrage at the huge paychecks lavished on bank executives. That led to a brief period of restraint as some chief execs went without bonuses.
That era is apparently over, according to a new study from Bloomberg that ranked the 10 most overpaid bank CEOs in 2012. And topping the list was Capital One's (COF) Richard Fairbank, who earned $17.5 million last year. He beat out Goldman Sachs' (GS) Lloyd Blankfein, even though Blankfein earned $26 million last year.
Here's why: To come up with its rankings, the publication considered several measures of bank performance under the CEO and gave each bank a rank. Then it subtracted the CEO's pay rank from the bank's performance rank. The CEOs with the biggest gap between the two were deemed the most overcompensated.
By that measure, Fairbank showed the widest difference between his pay and his company's average ranking. While Capital One's $313 billion in assets make it the 12th-biggest bank, Fairbank was the third-highest-paid CEO.
Even though Fairbank took a pay cut of almost 9% last year, he was still overpaid, Bloomberg says. A spokeswoman for Capital One -- known for its ads featuring actor Alec Baldwin and its huge number of customer complaints -- told Bloomberg Fairbank has received no salary for 16 years and his compensation is based on stock and tied to the bank's performance.
The second-most-overpaid bank CEO, Goldman's Blankfein, is a symbol to many of the banking system's excesses. As 2012's most highly compensated bank leader, Blankfein's $26 million far outpaced runner-up John Stumpf, who heads Wells Fargo (WFC) and made a mere $19.3 million last year.
In 2012, Goldman gave Blankfein a 73.3% pay hike, the biggest jump of the bank leaders on Bloomberg's list. The bank's return on equity placed it at No. 11, while the stock return was the fourth highest. Given the disparity between those indicators and Blankfein's pay, he earned the distinction of being the second-most-overpaid chief, Bloomberg says.
Goldman spokesman David Wells said the bank believes its framework for executive compensation is "a more reliable and thoughtful reflection of how best to compensate senior leaders than the methodology used for this exercise," according to the report.
Compensation for the top 20 bank CEOs rose 7.7% last year, the story says. That's a sizable boost when many Americans are facing meager raises of 1%, if they have jobs at all.
Follow Aimee Picchi on Twitter at @aimeepicchi.
The cause of this over payment is the share holders and Board of Directors of the bank. The shareholders don't seem to care and the Board of Directors are so overpaid them selves that they don't understand why every one don't make as much as they do.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The good news: Bad weather means fewer drivers on the road, and they're going slower than usual. The bad news: It's still dangerous.
- 8 questions to ask before Mom and Dad move in
- High deductibles fuel new worries of Obamacare sticker shock
- How to use your credit card to donate to charity
- Try this instead of raising the minimum wage
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
[BRIEFING.COM] S&P futures vs fair value: -1.40. Nasdaq futures vs fair value: -0.80. U.S. equity futures hold modest losses following a range-bound overnight session. The S&P 500 futures trade lower by 0.1%.
Reviewing overnight developments:
- Major Asian markets ended modestly lower. Japan's Nikkei -0.3%, Hong Kong's Hang Seng -0.3%, and China's Shanghai Composite settled little changed.
- Investors received several economic data ... More
More Market News
The photo-sharing site only has 10 employees, and it may be up for grabs.