Billionaire Saudi cries foul over Forbes' rich list
Prince Alwaleed claims the magazine's annual ranking of billionaires is biased against Middle Easterners. Forbes says he's in an 'alternate reality.'
Forbes' annual rankings of billionaires is sparking a brawl, with accusations of bias and financial shenanigans flying between the magazine publisher and Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal.
It's an unusual place to find Forbes' billionaire list, which typically offers the more sedate amusements of providing the have-nots with a glimpse of the huge fortunes behind the likes of Microsoft's (MSFT) Bill Gates and Berkshire Hathaway's (BRK.B) Warren Buffett. (Microsoft owns and publishes moneyNOW, an MSN Money site.)
But this year's annual billionaires list has turned into something of a slugfest. That's because Prince Alwaleed on Monday said he had "severed ties" with the Forbes list, accusing it of using a "flawed' valuation method that's biased against Middle Eastern investors.
Forbes, owned by wealthy businessman Steve Forbes, shot back on Tuesday with a scathing article that claims the value Prince Alwaleed places on his holdings seems like "an alternate reality."
In the middle of the dust-up might be the actual winner: the Bloomberg Billionaires index, created last year to compete with Forbes' list. That's partly because Alwaleed is throwing his support to the rival rich list, helping it gain attention and perhaps move out from the shadow of Forbes' better-known billionaires ranking.
But a bigger issue might be how the fight exposes the posturing that has apparently fueled the Forbes list in past years. As the magazine itself notes, Alwaleed first came to its attention in 1988, a year after it first published the rich list. The prince engaged in "lobbying, cajoling and threatening" to ensure his status on the list, with the writer even noting that Alwaleed called "in tears" after the 2006 list placed his wealth at $7 billion below what the prince said it was.
Bloomberg's rich list is backed by another billionaire: Michael Bloomberg, who founded financial data and news service Bloomberg LP and whose fortune Forbes pegs at $27 billion.
The Bloomberg list allows users to sort the wealthy by citizenship, gender, age and sources of wealth, and it uses the company's data systems to rejigger the billionaire standings each day. By Bloomberg's measure, Prince Alwaleed was the world's 16th-richest person on Tuesday, with $28 billion of net worth.
Forbes, however, ranks the prince at a lowly No. 26, pegging his wealth at $20 billion.
Alwaleed declined to talk with Forbes for its article, which offers a dim view of his personality and investing prowess. "Alwaleed has not proven to be a consistent investor. Over the past 20 years he has backed some serious dogs, such as Eastman Kodak and TWA," the piece notes.
It also claims the prince is using his Kingdom Holding shares, which are traded on the Saudi Stock Exchange, to push up his net worth. Prior to the annual release of the Forbes rich list, shares in Kingdom jumped sharply, the story says.
Several "former executives close to Alwaleed began telling Forbes a consistent story: The prince was using his public vehicle to inflate his net worth," the piece says.
Alwaleed said in his press release that "Forbes has no intention of improving the accuracy of their valuation of our holdings and we have made the decision to move on."
Talk about being born with a silver spoon in your mouth....Poor little Prince.
Whine like a cry baby.
Seriously? Is this guy really trying to say that this is an example of the infidels badly portraying a man of middle eastern decent? Here's a thought, lets utilize our own resources and technology to become independent of their oil and start an organization called FPEC (Food Product Exporting Countries) and retrieve some of the wealth that has been siphoned off to the Gulf Region. Let's see how he ranks after a few years of that.
Boo Ho, Ho...poor little Prince...leaching off the world with your oil....lucky you.
I bet you have never built anything with your own hands. Never learned anything, just sit back & count your money.
Thanks to the internal combustion engine...eah.
If this guy would pay more attention to business and investing then maybe he would be worth more. Hey, how much could ten camels be worth anyway?
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
While incompetent bosses like Michael Scott and Andy Bernard typically can’t survive in the workplace, office romances are a very real part of corporate culture.
- Southwest Airlines turns less legroom into $773M
- 'American Idol' gets sorry ratings for season finale
- Powerball's wacky sense of humor
- Millions of Facebook's users are actually pets
- Can crowd funding rescue the LA Times?
- Domino's debuts a DVD that smells like pizza
- Average US retirement age climbs to 61
- McDonald's aims to slim down its 145-item menu
- Bathroom reading goes digital with iPad TP stand
[BRIEFING.COM] The S&P 500 ended this week with a bang, roaring to a new all-time high on the back of stronger-than-expected economic data, influential leadership, and an ongoing appreciation for the Fed's monetary policy support.
The bullish bias was evident in premarket action as the S&P futures pointed to a higher start without the benefit of any definitive news catalyst. Stocks indeed benefited from a blast of buying interest at the opening bell on this ... More
More Market News
All hail the bull market, which ended the week with a big rally. But it also is starting to look a little like 1987, which suffered an epic blow-out.