Are humans a 'plague on the Earth'?

Beloved nature commentator David Attenborough says he has the key to solving climate change and other threats: Limit population growth.

By Aimee Picchi Jan 23, 2013 2:16PM

Sir David Attenborough in September 2012 (Oli Scarff/Getty Images)David Attenborough has been called one of England's national treasures for his work hosting natural history programs on television, but his latest remarks might offend many of his fans. 

Humans "are a plague on the Earth," Attenborough, 86, told the Radio Times magazine.

Climate change and food shortages are due to human overpopulation, he said. 

His prescription for solving the problem? "Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now,” he said.

Attenborough, who was knighted in the 1980s, has made his views on population growth known before. He became a supporter of the group Population Matters in 2009, according to the U.K.'s Telegraph

Population Matters supports "working for a global population size providing a good standard of living for all and environmental sustainability," and runs campaigns supporting family planning, free- or low-cost contraception and limiting free in-vitro fertilization to people without children, according to its website.

In his latest comments, Attenborough suggested that TV programs highlighting the plight of Africans suffering from famine are part of the problem. 

"We keep putting on programs about famine in Ethiopia; that’s what’s happening. Too many people there. They can’t support themselves -- and it’s not an inhuman thing to say. It’s the case. Until humanity manages to sort itself out and get a coordinated view about the planet it’s going to get worse and worse," he said.

His comments are spurring some debate and disagreement, with Bjorn Lomborg, the author of "The Skeptical Environmentalist," telling the Telegraph that Attenborough's Malthusian views are outdated. 

"We have dramatically more people but also ways to make agriculture more productive on less land," Lomborg said.  

He added that it's a "human-hating" point of view to believe that the only way to save the earth's species is to reduce the human population. 

The earth's population was estimated to have hit 7 billion in October, with more than half of those people born within the last 40 years.

More on moneyNOW

Jan 23, 2013 5:52PM
54 million abortions since 1974 in USA. 130 minute. Globally its billions. Guess that programs not enough time to sterilize people?
Jan 23, 2013 5:50PM

More than 7 billion people.......



and yet.......




Everybody sucks but me.

Jan 23, 2013 5:49PM

Which one of you people who agree we have too many people volunteer to be the first to go?


So most replies i have gotten say that attrition will decide and we dont have to kill anyone.


I agree that I should not be forced to pay for anothers lack of restraint in having children they cannot afford. It does not mean I cannot voluntarily do this.


However, if i have a job that can support 15 children, it is not your right or the governments right to tell me I cant have those 15 children. My rights come from my creator. Not you or any government official.

Jan 23, 2013 5:46PM
omg, about time this was talked about, could you amagine a world with no famine and where human life was more sacred, with technology taking more jobs and more people out of work farms running at max capacity, trash being dumped into the ocean along with human sewage and fertilizers creating larger and larger dead zones in the ocean and more people having multiple children on welfare we need an easy way to make large populations of people infertile for sevreal years tell we can get this under control it would be the greatest thing to happen to humanity ever. alowing more money and time to create technology to leave our children with a clean and wonderful earth THIS would please god. HE gave us the brains and would expect us to use it.
Jan 23, 2013 5:39PM
An article just like this was written back in 2011 on 
Jan 23, 2013 5:37PM
Prof. Paul Ehrlich said this in a major book in 1968, "The Population
Bomb" --- he still stands by it.   Montana just made a pop. of one million and it's too many for old timers...Calif. will be around 50 million by 2050 and I won't be around to despise the newcomers and the jammed US 91 with 20 lanes by then between Orange county and the Inland Empire.  I guess the muckymucks who run Haiti have never heard of the book, or the use of condoms, right? 
Jan 23, 2013 5:32PM
Hey David, you're 86. Get off the planet. 
Jan 23, 2013 5:27PM
Maybe God has already thougt of that?  Like in the second coming of Jesus, perhaps?  Who knows what He has in store for us?  I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side if the Bible is true.  To God be the glory!  Maybe He already has a good plan to restore the Earth after we mess it up?  I hope for our sakes it includes us.  ( For here or the rest of the universe)
Jan 23, 2013 5:24PM
I remember watching a program about a string of rocky islands somewhere in the Pacific. Not a thing on them but rock.
Scientist figured out that at one time one of the islands was occupied by rats.
They ate everything in site. Ate all the vegetation. Then they ate all the seeds.
When there was nothing else, they ate each other. When the first island was completely eaten up, some rats swam to the next island and continued in their same habit of eating away. Finally, all the vegetation, all the seed and all but one last rat existed on the last island. It died of starvation leaving behind a string of nothing but stones sticking out of the ocean.

Remind you of anything?

Jan 23, 2013 5:13PM
Jan 23, 2013 5:12PM
Jan 23, 2013 5:01PM
Of course David Attenborough is absolutely correct.  Anyone who thinks otherwise is ignorant and delusional. The data is unambiguous, and only one conclusion can be drawn from it - reduce human populations worldwide or get visited by the 4 horsemen of the apocolypse. 
Jan 23, 2013 3:51PM
Yes, I believe we are reaching critical mass and straining natural resources. Something has to give. It's the law of nature, physics and the universe.
Jan 23, 2013 3:44PM
I agree with Mr. Lomborg, but it's a matter of putting our long term interests ahead of our short term interests. Since short term interests seem so much more popular than long term interests, I'm afraid Mr. Attenborough  will end up being right.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?


Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?


[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market finished an upbeat week on a mixed note. The S&P 500 shed less than a point, ending the week higher by 1.3%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.1%) cemented a 1.7% advance for the week. High-beta names underperformed, which weighed on the Nasdaq Composite (-0.3%) and the Russell 2000 (-1.3%).

Equity indices displayed strength in the early going with the S&P 500 tagging the 2,019 level during the opening 30 minutes of the action. However, ... More