Are soda taxes the answer to the fiscal cliff?
One activist group says yes, though it won't do much to curb obesity.
Give the Center for Science and the Public Interest credit for being creative. The group, which has long advocated levying taxes on sugary sodas as a means of reducing the nation's soaring obesity rates, argued in a press release Friday that it could help solve the nation's fiscal woes. The group also wants to raise taxes on alcoholic beverages.
"A penny-per-ounce tax on soda and other sugar-based beverages would raise $160 billion over 10 years even as it would make a modest dent in consumption," according to CSPI. "Even smaller soda taxes of just a penny per can could raise $10 billion over 10 years."
The economic argument that CSPI raises certainly is compelling during these trying fiscal times, as investors fret about the imposition of draconian tax hikes and government spending cuts being imposed if Congress fails to take action before the end of the year. The proposal, though, raises more questions than it answers, and doesn't stand a chance of passing Congress given the political clout of the beverage industry.
First, the case that soda is a threat to public health that some, such as New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, make is far from iron-clad. Per-capita soda consumption has been on the decline for years. CSPI itself cheered this trend in a 2010 press release. The non-profit also has a restrictive definition of "sugary beverage" to include ice tea and fruit-flavored drinks with little or no juice, according to spokesman Jeff Cronin. Pure fruit juices, which are full of sugar, would not qualify, he told me in an email.
"Unlike orange juice, say, which does have nutrients, soda and juiceless fruit-flavored drinks have no redeeming nutritional qualities," he writes in an email.
While that's true, fruit juice has its problems. The American Academy of Pediatrics discourages parents from giving these beverages to babies under 6 months of age unless it is needed to alleviate constipation. There are plenty of other loopholes too. Diet soda may lack calories, but its consumption has been linked to increased risk of stroke. Why should Starbucks get a free pass given the caloric heft of some of its beverages? A 16-ounce Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Latte packs a whopping 380 calories, 120 of which come from fat. A 12-ounce can of Classic Coke seems healthy by comparison because it has 140 calories, none of which come from fat.
Making it more expensive for people to get their caloric fixes won't make them thinner, but it will make them poorer. People, including this writer, become overweight and stay that way for many reasons, ranging from the genetic to the sociological. Declaring "war" on some foods and not others is bad science and even worse public policy.
--Jonathan Berr does not shares of the listed stocks.
More from Money Now
Just tell the da in washington.. to pass the FAIR TAX ACT.. that way EVERY ONE would pay their fair share.. that includes the rich, government officials, and even the illegal's in this country...
It would do away with the IRS.. that should free up some money right there..
we all are working about 128 days a year, just to pay for all the taxes that we do pay.. and know that does not include the tax if you do not have health insurance.. just so u know..
Just my humble thoughts on the matter...
Never gonna happen! The obese in this country, far outweigh the congress. We are already taxed through the nose on everything as it is. Cut spending, thats the one answer. Our tax rates may be low, but we are taxed on everything else. Payroll taxes, income taxed, excise taxes, cigarette taxes, booze taxes, everything you buy, TAXES!!!!
Enough with the taxes, stop spending money you don't have. Hear that congress? STOP SPENDING!!!
Is there anyone left who remembers what the BOSTON TEA PARTY was all about? Taxes on a popular beverage implemented by a tyranical government. The concept of using taxes as a tool to control social behavior should OUTRAGE every true freedom loving American.
Yet people buy into it for the stupid reason that it will help lower the deficit. Shurley there isn't anybody that stupid. Oh wait........obama was re-elected by those same people.
Maybe I'm just abnormal, but to me fluid has nutritional value, I can't run without it.
I agree that products should be taxed to reflect their true cost to society. If the revenues of this tax were targeted to health care I would approve.
But what I'd rather see is me being able to put myself in an insurance risk pool with other people that take as good care of their bodies as I do.
Higher taxes on cigarettes were just the beginning, but those that voted for them were too stupid to see that. You have now opened the door to all out attacks on anything and everything they can make an extra tax dollar on.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
The good news: Bad weather means fewer drivers on the road, and they're going slower than usual. The bad news: It's still dangerous.
- 8 questions to ask before Mom and Dad move in
- High deductibles fuel new worries of Obamacare sticker shock
- How to use your credit card to donate to charity
- Try this instead of raising the minimum wage
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
[BRIEFING.COM] With 90 minutes of the session in the rear-view mirror, the major averages have erased the bulk of their losses. In fact, the Nasdaq has retraced its entire opening decline and now trades with a modest gain of 0.1%.
Even though the Nasdaq sports a modest gain, the technology sector trades in-line with the S&P 500, which hovers just below its flat line. Only one other cyclical group-energy-hovers in the red while consumer discretionary, financials, industrials, and ... More
More Market News
Brick and mortar sales might not be booming, but that doesn't tell the whole retail story.