Hacking raises concerns about Fed safety
The group Anonymous broke into a Federal Reserve internal website Sunday and posted private information about bank executives.
The Federal Reserve had a busy Super Bowl Sunday. As millions of Americans watched the game, one of its internal websites was breached by the hacker group Anonymous, although no critical functions were affected, according to Reuters.
Anonymous, though, appears to have gained access to the private information of more than 4,000 American bank executives, according to ZDNet.com. It apparently posted the data, and while that has been taken down, a mirror still exists here.
While that might tickle the fancy of some U.S. citizens, given the low regard that many have for bankers following the 2008 financial crisis, the attack raises questions about the cyber-security of the U.S. central bank.
The Fed declined to disclose which website had been hacked, but it appears to be a contact database for banks to use during a natural disaster, Reuters notes.
The central bank sought to downplay the attack, with a representative for the Fed calling Anonymous' claims "overstated." The representative wouldn't disclose details about the Fed's security systems, but noted that measures to protect the agency against hacks were "absolutely" in place.
So how concerning is the hack? Given that the bank handles trillions of dollars and bills itself as providing the nation with a "safe, flexible, and stable monetary and financial system," it's worrying.
Security software company McAfee issued a warning in December that an impending cyber-attack on credit unions, national and local banks and other financial institutions is a "credible threat."
For its part, Anonymous' motives in attacking the Fed appears to be related to OpLastResort, a campaign started to protest the government's prosecution of Aaron Swartz, who killed himself in January. Swartz is credited with developing the Web feed format RSS and the social news site Reddit, among other accomplishments.
More on moneyNOW
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Tired of constantly dying batteries, she came up with a device that could revolutionize energy storage -- and won $50,000 from Intel.
- Detroit in hot water over proposal to sell art
- Sears spirals toward oblivion
- Why aren't heads rolling at the IRS?
- Do we pay attention to roads and bridges now?
- Yahoo may be going after Hulu
- Apple's first computer could fetch $450,000
- AT&T adds sneaky fee onto its wireless bills
- Soaring ER use adds more pain to health costs
- Netflix gets 'Arrested Development' stars cheap
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break U.S. stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.