Has Boeing's Dreamliner become a nightmare?
Already this week, airlines report 4 separate problems with the aircraft. The plane is still troubled after a rocky path to production.
Shares of Boeing (BA) fell 2.6% Tuesday amid new questions about the safety and reliability of its much-hyped 787 Dreamliner, which began flying last year after nearly four years of delays.According to a Boeing statement, smoke found Monday during the cleaning of a Japan Airlines 787 was traced to the battery used to start the auxiliary power unit. The company is cooperating with an investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board.
In a separate incident Monday, another JAL Dreamliner reported an electric fire. Tuesday, a JAL 787 was forced to cancel its takeoff and return to the gate after a fuel leak was discovered. The incidents happened on three different planes, according to Reuters.
"As is standard practice within the industry, it would be premature to discuss additional details at this stage as the investigation is ongoing," the company said about the electrical fire incident. "However, nothing that we’ve seen in this case indicates a relationship to any previous 787 power system events, which involved power panel faults elsewhere in the aft electrical equipment bay."
They are the latest in a litany of woes affecting the 787. The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that United found that the wiring was installed incorrectly on one of its Dreamliners. Indeed, the aircraft's development has been anything but a dream. Japan's All Nippon Airways, which received the first Dreamliner deliveries last year, was forced to temporarily ground the aircraft in July after engine problems were discovered, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Airlines were attracted to the Dreamliner because Boeing boasted that it could cut fuel costs by as much as 20%. Jet fuel is, not surprisingly, huge portion of an airline's costs. The Dreamliner has many fans. It is the first airliner built with carbon-reinforced composite plastics instead of metal, which help it fly faster and further using less fuel than more conventional aircraft.
"Pilots who strap into Boeing's new 787 most likely will conclude that it is the easiest to fly and most intuitive jetliner ever built by the Seattle-based manufacturer, based upon our findings during a demo flight in mid-November," wrote Fred George in Aviation Week.
Whether the dream will match the reality of the 787 remains to be seen. A Boeing spokeswoman declined to comment beyond the company's statement.
--Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
More on Money Now
- China food probe slams KFC's parent
- Can Eddie Lampert save Sears?
- Allstate tries to fix a public relations blunder
Just goes to show you the true cost of outsourcing the engineering of the aircraft. What exactly did you think would happen when you used inexperienced new hire engineers, overseas engineers in india and inexperienced new hire workers on the 787 program. You saved a ton of money didn't you Boeing? What a joke! At this point, I doubt you will ever turn a profit on this airplane. Maybe it's time to make some changes, and have experienced Boeing engineers, and experienced mechanics building this aircraft. Not engineers just out of college. Not engineers from India, and definitely not new hire mechanics off the street, which by the way have no clue how to build a quality aircraft!
Somebody had better pull their head out, before this company gets run into the ground, and for all of you newer mechanics, and quality inspectors on the line, that think you are protecting your jobs by constantly trying to delay delivery of the aircraft with intentional poor workmanship, and writing ridiculous pickups on jobs......... Let me assure you, that is not the case. You are all digging your own hole very quickly. Wait and see. High quality aircraft and on-time deliveries=profit and jobs! Low quality work and not delivering aircraft on time=profit loss, job losses, and very possibly the loss of the 787 program completely. If Boeing isn't making any money on this program, no point in continuing to build this aircraft. What is so hard to understand about that?
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
RECENT POSTS
Tired of constantly dying batteries, she came up with a device that could revolutionize energy storage -- and won $50,000 from Intel.
- Detroit in hot water over proposal to sell art
- Sears spirals toward oblivion
- Why aren't heads rolling at the IRS?
- Do we pay attention to roads and bridges now?
- Yahoo may be going after Hulu
- Apple's first computer could fetch $450,000
- AT&T adds sneaky fee onto its wireless bills
- Soaring ER use adds more pain to health costs
- Netflix gets 'Arrested Development' stars cheap
MARKET UPDATE
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
TOP STOCKS
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break US stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.
MSN MONEY'S
- Shared
- Commented
- Viewed



