Google's YouTube to allow user subscriptions
Will people pay for something that they previously received for free?
According to The New York Times, Google is expected to announce a plan to let some video makers charge a monthly subscription. The system would work like the paywall at many magazines and newspapers, including The Times. It isn't clear how someone could qualify for the program, although YouTube probably has set the bar high. Most videos will remain free for viewers.
The channels will be divided into subject areas, such as children's programming and entertainment, but wouldn't have pre-scheduled programs such as cable and broadcast television networks. Some channels will cost as little as $1.99 per month. These changes have been rumored in the media for months and aren't a shock.
YouTube had little choice but to figure a way for its video content providers to make some money since rivals such as Amazon.com (AMZN), Hulu and Netflix (NFLX) have been ratcheting up their spending on original video content. As The Times notes, YouTube stars have been "frustrated by what they see as relatively low amounts of revenue coming from the ads that YouTube attaches to their videos." As I found out in 2010, YouTube isn't shy about making a buck. A video my wife shot of my son dancing to "Eye of the Tiger" that we posted on the site wound up embedded with an ad urging viewers to buy the "Rocky III" theme song.
To attract potential subscribers, YouTube will have to convince people that it has more than cute kitten videos and that its content is worth the cost. That isn't going to be an easy task.
--Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
- $600 seats? Rolling Stones fans say get off your cloud
- Group to debut handgun you can print at home
No, but people are stupid enough to spend $150/month for a useless cell phone plan, so I quess anything is possible.
I would never pay to watch Youtube videos ever! Don't they make money off the ads??
the younger generations think that there is a price on everything...just a way of life..
yes they will probably pay without getting anything or anymore for the money..
they accept that to easily and will for generations to come..
they never had to struggle for the most part.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages finished the session on a lower note as the S&P 500 lost 0.4% while the Nasdaq shed 0.1%. The Russell 2000, which paced the retreat on Tuesday and Wednesday, added 0.2%, trimming its December loss to 3.5%.
After spending the first half of the session in a steady retreat, the S&P 500 found technical support in the 1772 area. Upon reaching that level, the index reversed sharply, and marched back to its flat line. There was no particular catalyst ... More
More Market News
With the universe of this category in its seasonal sweet spot, these picks have tailwinds propelling them into the new year.