California's San Onofre nuke plant won't be revived
With Edison International permanently closing the facility, the issue of aging reactors in the US is becoming inescapable.
One of California's largest power facilities is closing for good -- and that closure raises new questions about America's aging nuclear power industry.
The Los Angeles Times reports the decision came 17 months after the plant was shut due to problems with it steam generating system. Until that closure, San Onofre powered about 1.4 million households in Southern California. SCE spent $500 million on replacement power after the outage.
"We have concluded that the continuing uncertainty about when or if (the plant) might return to service was not good for our customers, our investors, or the need to plan for our region's long-term electricity needs," Ted Craver, Edison International's chairman and CEO told the newspaper.
Opponents of nuclear power praised the news, and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said she was "relieved."
"This nuclear plant had a defective redesign and could no longer operate as intended," Boxer said in a statement. "Modifications to the San Onofre nuclear plant were unsafe and posed a danger to the 8 million people living within 50 miles of the plant."
The U.S. currently has 104 nuclear reactors in 31 U.S. states operated by 32 companies, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry representative. Those reactors also generate 19% of America's electricity. But the World Nuclear Association noted that nearly all the electricity nuclear power generates in the U.S. comes from reactors built between the late 1960s and 1990. And that, until this year, "there had been no new construction starts (on nuclear reactors) since 1977."
The San Onofre plant is just the latest nuclear reactor to close. The Financial Times reports Duke Energy (DUK) says it will retire its Crystal River plant in Florida, which has also been shut down for repairs, while Dominion Resources (D) intends to turn off its Kewaunee plant in Wisconsin.
Analysts say the nuclear industry is having to contend with officials looking at alternatives to traditional power sources, as well as lower natural gas prices brought on by America's shale boom.
"Regulators are becoming more confident that investing in gas plants has lower costs and presents lower risks to customers," Travis Miller, Morningstar utilities analyst, told the FT, "than spending hundreds of millions of dollars and taking on the uncertainty that goes with repairing a nuclear plant."
California plan is to tax the "rich'" of course.
In March 2013, Lancaster California became the first U.S. city to mandate the inclusion of solar panels on new homes, requiring that "every new housing development must average 1 kilowatt per house. 1 KW LOL
In May 2013, Sebastopol followed suit, requiring new buildings include either 2 W/sq ft of insulated building space of photovoltaics, or enough to provide 75% of the expected annual electricity use. 75% again LMFAO.
These forced mandates aren't going to work anywhere except in upscale communities.
Heck, I used 875 KW just last month. California Dreamin' ♫ ♬ ♪ ♩ ♪
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market capped the trading week with losses across the major averages. The S&P 500 fell 0.5% to surrender its weekly gain, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.7%) and Russell 2000 (-0.9%) underperformed. The two indices posted respective losses of 0.8% and 0.6% for the week.
Equity indices were pressured from the get-go after several heavyweights disappointed the market with their earnings and/or guidance, which led to some broader profit-taking. After ... More
More Market News
The idea of US crude being a shelter from turmoil abroad may not be as far fetched as it seems.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'