Is this the end of unpaid internships?
A judge rules that a movie studio should pay interns working on 'Black Swan.' Other recession-era interns are also filing suit.
In a decision that could have huge consequences for the film industry and other businesses that benefit from unpaid internships, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled on Tuesday that 20th Century Fox subsidiary Fox Searchlight violated minimum-wage laws by not paying two production interns for their work on the film "Black Swan," The New York Times reports.
Eric Glatt and Alexander Footman sued Fox Searchlight in September 2011, claiming they did the work of paid employees without receiving any compensation. The suit claimed they took lunch orders, answered phones, arranged other employees’ travel plans, tracked purchase orders, took out the trash and assembled office furniture. The judge noted that those tasks held no educational value and benefited only the studio.
"Undoubtedly Mr. Glatt and Mr. Footman received some benefits from their internships, such as résumé listings, job references and an understanding of how a production office works," Judge William Pauley wrote. "But those benefits were incidental to working in the office like any other employees and were not the result of internships intentionally structured to benefit them."
The judge pointed to rules set by the Department of Labor that say unpaid internships should not be to the immediate advantage of the employer, that their work must be similar to vocational training given in an educational environment, and that the experience must be for the benefit of the intern and the intern’s work must not displace that of regular employees.
While the studio could make the argument that Glatt, who has an MBA from Case Western Reserve University, may have benefited from the insider's view of a studio's business workings, the lack of vocational training and the clear substitution of paid labor for unpaid interns proved Fox's undoing.
Pauley even went so far as to suggest that receiving academic credit was of little importance in determining whether interns should be paid. Intern Bridge, a research firm, estimates that undergraduates work in more than 1 million internships a year, half of which are unpaid.
While that was standard procedure pre-recession, unpaid interns in a weak job market have been far less patient with the process. In February 2012, a former Harper’s Bazaar intern sued Hearst Magazines, saying she regularly clocked 40 to 55 hours a week without being paid. Her claim is now a class-action suit that includes unpaid interns who worked in the company’s magazines division since February 2009.
This February, an unpaid intern sued Elite Model Management for $50 million. After a lawsuit brought by unpaid interns, PBS host Charlie Rose and his production company announced last December that they would pay back wages of $1,100 each to as many as 189 interns.
Interns should be paid. Now they are just the cheapest of labor a company can find,
Unpaid internships are great if you don't have any bills, enjoy working for nothing with no guarantee of paid future employment and are fine with being taken advantage of. EXPERIENCE IS NOT COMPENSATION. No thanks.
Making someone work without pay is illegal. The only reason unpaid internships aren't illegal is because the intern isn't being forced to work that internship and the "pay" is supposed to come from the intern getting a hands on education about the field they are working in, which is hopefully the field they will want to work in. However, emptying trash cans, fetching coffee and ordering lunch for people does not give them this hands on insight into the future career they're supposed to be learning about.
Internships should be like work placement programs arranged by schools in which you report to a certain authority whose job is to make sure your internship is worthwhile and forces you to make a record of how the internship gave you meaningful insight into your future career choice, whether you learned anything worthwhile during your internship, how your employer and fellow employees treated you, when you asked questions about specific processes around the workplace did they get answered properly etc. and similarly, your employer will make a report of your progress, what exactly your employer had you do and how it pertains to the career you want to work in, what was your attitude around the workplace, would they consider hiring you as a paid employee once your internship is over, etc. Because the only way unpaid internships will be worthwhile is if employers are forced to make it worthwhile for their interns and not use interns as free/cheap labour.
This ruling will affect more than large corporations that can afford to pay in many peoples opinions. It will affect design firms large and small all across the nation and will affect the ability of many young designers and artists to get the experience they need.
I am in the design profession, owning a small office and I will not hire an intern without paying them for their time. I do not hire them as personal attendants, but as an employee with a full work station for their use. Rarely if ever get enough productivity from an intern to cover the cost to employ them. In actuality I am employing them to allow them to get the experience they will need to be hired in the future. Why? I feel it is payback for the firms that hired me when I was getting started. I do get gratification as they all come back years later to say thank you when they realize the value of the experience, and realize that they were not as productive as they thought they were at the time.
Because we pay, and the expensed of having an open workstation with the hardware and software required, I can only provide internships when cash flow is good and we have turnover in staff, freeing up a work station. If I were to bring in a summer intern this summer (had 10 requests), just providing the work station would cost $12,000-18,000 which would sit unused after they went back to school. We have not had an intern since 2008 due to the economy. I have had many requests from students wanting the experience for their resume in order to get their first "real" job after school. Many have offered to work for free.
While these offers are tempting and many firms do it, I choose not to. While helping students get experience is important to me, I have made the choice to not bring someone on board that I can not provide a rich experience for and pay them out of my pocket when they are working.
However any thoughts of bringing in an intern in who begs for the experience without pay will be a thing of the past for many firms with this ruling. I know many who have worked for free or limited salary just for the opportunity to gain the experience when the economy was tight in the 80's and 90's and IS was what got them their first "real job" once the economy improved. Good luck to those who need the experience to get started in their professions as part of the learning curve required outside of the classroom, I hope you can find it after this ruling.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
A basic income policy can actually ensure a decent standard of living for everyone.
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
[BRIEFING.COM] A solid November employment report translated into a solid day of gains for the major averages. While there was some talk that the encouraging job growth raised the odds of the Fed announcing a tapering at its December meeting, the message of the markets today was either that it didn't believe there would be a tapering this month or that it doesn't fear a tapering this month.
It was just one day, yet there was ample meaning wrapped up in the connection that the 10-yr ... More
More Market News
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.