How gun-makers shrugged off illegal sales
Testimony from liability lawsuits shows they were reluctant to volunteer help in curbing criminal purchases.
But gun-makers didn't like the old laws so much a decade ago, and they have used new ones to shield themselves from accountability.
The New York Times recently dug into a pile of transcripts from a series of liability lawsuits filed before 2005 -- when Congress passed a law protecting gun manufacturers from such suits -- and found the weapons manufacturers consistently opposed monitoring the dealers and distributors that sell their firearms to the public, beyond the most basic requirements of the law.
As Charles Guevremont, the president of gun-maker Browning, said: "That's not for us to enforce the law."
On Tuesday, The Times published testimony from transcripts that were labeled as confidential and packed away in archives at law firms and courthouses around the country. As the paper discovered, not only are gun manufacturers still unwilling to voluntarily prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands, but lobbying by gun-rights groups has restricted the government's use of gun-sale tracing since the lawsuits began and has made it difficult to enforce existing laws.
Limits on multiple gun sales to a single buyer, a major issue in most of the lawsuits, is still a contentious topic as the gun industry is in court fighting a new requirement that dealers report such rifle sales under certain circumstances. In the testimony, most gun industry executives appeared to feel little or no responsibility for monitoring such behavior.
A Glock executive, for example, testified that he would maintain a business relationship with a gun dealer indicted on charges of violating firearms laws, because "this is still America" and "you're still innocent until proven guilty." The president of Sturm, Ruger & Co. (RGR) shrugged off police traces of guns back to the company's distributors, saying they "wouldn't show us anything."
Asked whether his company tried to learn if dealers were illegally trafficking guns on the black market, a Taurus International executive responded, "I don't even know what a gun trafficker is."
MKS Supply owner Charles Brown, whose company is the only distributor of an inexpensive brand of gun that frequently turned up in criminal investigations, said he never looked at trace requests from federal officials to see which of his dealers frequently sold guns used in crimes.
More than 30 cities, counties or states filed suit against gun-makers beginning in the late 1990s, charging that the industry was negligent, or willfully blind, in its sales practices. It was a tactic similar to the one used in successful suits against tobacco companies -- but to far lesser effect in this case.
"As Charles Guevremont, the president of gun-maker Browning, said: "That's not for us to enforce the law."
Duh, its law enforcement's job to enforce the laws. Its for the manufacturer to FOLLOW the law.
You are not going to get the press off Obama by this ruse.The laws on the books need to be enforced,
not new ones written by moronic democrats that believe a clip is ammunition.
HYPOCRISY! HYPOCRISY. Easier for misplaced conceptions about the gun industry.
Alcohol and Tobacco Industries. Responsible for more deaths than the gun industry, but where's the public outcry?
I would like to know how much and what kind of liquor you have in your home. We need this information so that the type of liquor used by drunk drivers can be outlawed. Bartenders,liquor salesmen ,and food vendors that sell liquor need to be held accountable.Drunk drivers are not at fault it is the manufacturers and those that sell liquor that are at fault.
Sounds stupid doesn't it. If you don't want a gun,don't buy one.
So why should gun manufacturers be the police? Can anyone tell me even one other business where manufacturers are supposed to participate in regulating the end-users of their products? That's ridiculous!
It is obvious Nolte has never shot, loaded, cleaned, or owned a gun. What is illegal is the attack on our constitutional rights.
Give these gun manufacturers a break! There's a limit to the number of folks who can traffic in narcotics.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
A basic income policy can actually ensure a decent standard of living for everyone.
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
[BRIEFING.COM] A solid November employment report translated into a solid day of gains for the major averages. While there was some talk that the encouraging job growth raised the odds of the Fed announcing a tapering at its December meeting, the message of the markets today was either that it didn't believe there would be a tapering this month or that it doesn't fear a tapering this month.
It was just one day, yet there was ample meaning wrapped up in the connection that the 10-yr ... More
More Market News
The Fed may start tapering in just a few months. Here are a few of the likely winners and losers.