Money trouble: Other shoe drops for Lance Armstrong
A former promoter is suing the disgraced cyclist, demanding he pay back $12 million in prize money.
It must be tough to be one of Lance Armstrong's former promoters. After all, many paid millions to the one-time Tour de France winner, only to have their investments look foolish after he was stripped of his record seven titles for doping.
But one of them isn't moving on quietly. SCA Promotions has sued Armstrong, demanding the return of $12 million in prize money it paid him after winning the 2002, 2003 and 2004 races.
SCA, a promotional marketing company, makes its outrage felt in its lawsuit.
"By now, everyone knows that Lance Armstrong perpetuated what may well be the most outrageous, cold-hearted and elaborate lie in the history of sports," the lawsuit claims.
The lawsuit risks further damage to Armstrong's reputation. If he chooses to fight -- and resists paying back the money -- he might turn off the fans he still has. The case could force Armstrong to go back under oath and face more questions about doping, notes USA Today.
It's not as if Armstrong's reputation hasn't already taken quite a beating.
He admitted to doping in an interview with Oprah Winfrey last month, a confession that opened him up to legal challenges and negotiations with prior supporters. Many viewers felt Armstrong came off as unlikable, a feeling that was aided by his own admission of bullying during during his cycling career.
His interview with Winfrey is cited in SCA's lawsuit, which alleges that the cyclist's statements last month were a "stunning admission of perjury."
In 2004, SCA Promotions had withheld a bonus because of doping allegations, but in sworn testimony in 2005, Armstrong vehemently denied the accusations. SCA eventually gave him a settlement of $7.5 million because -- at the time -- he was the official 2004 winner.
"While he lied to everyone, Lance Armstrong lied to SCA in shocking fashion: while testifying under oath in a legal proceeding," the lawsuit says. (Note: emphasis is in the lawsuit.)
It's not clear whether Armstrong will return the money. According to USA Today, Armstrong's attorney, Tim Herman, last week said the cyclist wasn't planning on paying back the money. The reason? He said there's no precedent for an athlete to return earnings after even being found guilty of wrongdoing.
More on moneyNOW
Martha Stewart went to jail for lying to the feds, not for insider trading. Seems like we're at the same junction again.
will all his leftwing commie democrats come to his aid.........or they will run as he will be looking for money; that money they DO NOT hand out as they suggest to those who are not commies.......
COMMIE COMMIE COMMIE; COME HOME.......this song will ring in your years all day then all week then while your sleeping......baaaaaaaaaaah hahahahahahaha
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Tired of constantly dying batteries, she came up with a device that could revolutionize energy storage -- and won $50,000 from Intel.
- Detroit in hot water over proposal to sell art
- Sears spirals toward oblivion
- Why aren't heads rolling at the IRS?
- Do we pay attention to roads and bridges now?
- Yahoo may be going after Hulu
- Apple's first computer could fetch $450,000
- AT&T adds sneaky fee onto its wireless bills
- Soaring ER use adds more pain to health costs
- Netflix gets 'Arrested Development' stars cheap
[BRIEFING.COM] Stocks entered the weekend on a mixed note as the S&P 500 shed 0.1% while the Dow ended with a gain of 0.1%.
The major averages began the day on a lower note as nine of ten sectors saw losses of more than 0.5%.
The consumer staples sector was the lone exception as the group spent the entire day in positive territory thanks to the relative strength of Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG 81.89, +3.19). The second-largest staple stock advanced ... More
More Market News
Try as the bears might, they couldn't break US stocks. But investors still face frothy prices and considerable headwinds.