Wal-Mart resists pressure on gun sales
The retailer has withstood similar criticism for years. Many locations have sold out of semi-automatic rifles since last week's Connecticut school shooting.
Freedom Group, the corporate owner of Bushmaster, the maker of the weapon used by Sandy Hook Elementary killer Adam Lanza, gets about 13% of its sales from Wal-Mart, which is probably the one of the biggest sellers of firearms and ammunition in the country.
Many Wal-Mart locations have sold out of semi-automatic rifles since the school shooting, Bloomberg reports. The company's website says several guns are out of stock in five states. Prices for gun magazines were reportedly surging on eBay (EBAY), according to the news service.
Wal-Mart sells modern sporting rifles, the term the industry uses to describe weapons similar to the M-16 used by the military, in about 1,200 locations and does not sell high-capacity magazines for these weapons, according to Bloomberg. The news service quotes spokesman David Tovar as saying, "We remain dedicated to the safe and responsible sale of firearms in areas of the country where they are sold."
Sales of guns and ammunition have surged in the days after the Dec. 14 incident as buyers worried about a crackdown by President Barack Obama, who on Wednesday asked Vice President Joe Biden to lead a task force on gun violence that will issue recommendations by next month. It seems likely that a new assault weapons ban will head to a vote in the Congress in the coming months that the political powerful gun lobby will have difficulty stopping.
Gun control advocates can't overplay their hand. Attacking Wal-Mart too aggressively for selling guns to people legally able to buy them could turn the retailer into a martyr for the Second Amendment. Customers will rally around the retailer, like people did when Chick-fil-A was attacked for its views on gay rights, and buy even more firearms and ammunition. Gun critics should ask themselves whether they prefer that people buy weapons through a multinational company which is accountable for its actions or a gun show dealer where restrictions are not as stringent.
Wal-Mart has to be careful as well. Perhaps the company believes that pressure to curtail gun sales, which includes an online petition, will die down as the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary fades from people's memories. That would be a mistake. The slaughter of 20 children and six educators is forever etched in the nation's consciousness.
--Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
More from Money Now
The 2008 Supreme Court case shows definitively that the Second Amendment is about an archaic issue relevant to 1790, not to 2012. The Second Amendment reads as follows:
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The purpose of the Second Amendment was to prevent the new Federal Government established in 1789 from disarming the state militias and replacing them with a Federal standing army. It was a concern that was relevant perhaps for a few years around the birth of the country. It is irrelevant today. Americans do not rely on state militias in 2012 for our freedom from the federal government.
Though Justice Antonin Scalia tried in the majority opinion to use the Second Amendment to defend gun rights, the many sources that he cited are clear that the purpose of the amendment was to protect state militias. One source, for example, , that the purpose of the Second Amendment is "to secure a well-armed militia... ." Another source Scalia cited indicates that the amendment covers only arms that "have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."
a gun did not kill anyone a mentally ill child took those people's lives. if you use the incident above as a basis on reaction then the following should happen:
1 planes should be banned because two people slammed them into the world trade center towers killed how many thousands.
2 trains should be banned because it ran over and killed a man just weeks ago.
3 tractor trailers should be banned because yesterday one killed a lady on the highway in long island NY
what I am getting at is people cause these problems and it is getting worse everyday, we have to find out what is causing this anger in people to drive them to do these things!
Just for the record I AM NOT A GUN ADVOCATE ! I just want everyone to wake up and see what is going on around them, and more gun control will not solve it. The people who want to hurt others will always find a way to do so.
The president is sworn to uphold the laws of the country. Congress passes the laws and he signs them into law. When government takes away our rights--the courts decide the issue. The courts have said we can own and have guns. Taxing weapons and ammunition is okay. But, if a poor person says the government is taxing weapons and ammo to the point he can't afford them--the courts will throw it out.
Owning a gun is not subject to the president, nor can he do anything without Congressional approval. If you don't want gun control or ammo control--vote!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them (because) no problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive." Albert Einstein
In the wake of a national tragedy liberals to propose gun control measures sure to infringe on our second amendment rights. This is feed to us as simply making the world a safer place. The conservatives that are so concerned about gun control and our second amendment rights had no problem with infringing on the fourth and sixth amendments with the passing of the Patriot Act in 2001 in order to make the world a safer place.
In the end we will all see our rights slowly eroding, but we allow it if the shepherds of your flock propose the changes.
The Bill of Rights was written so sentiment wouldnt play a role our rights and liberties.
They can not nor will they ever ban Guns in American Society. Face it they are here to stay. So since the Foid Card is federally issued it falls on the Federal Government to restrict who gets it. Make it mandatory to take Gun safety classes and a Psych test before getting your foid card. (Have the NRA pay for said test since they will fight against it!)
Then make any crime where a Gun is involved a federal Crime with stiffer penalties. If you do not have a gun legally and you are convicted of a crime the penalty is multiplied and parole not allowed. If the Crime involves the discharge of said illegal gun, Death penalty can be part of the sentancing. And just for $hit$ and giggles, use the firing squad made up of FOID card owners to carry out the penalty...
It is bad enough that Bad People have guns. But what I object to is the fact that people who carry out crimes with Guns are cutting deals and back on the streets using Guns again. Make the penalties higher. Bring back the Death penalty for Federal Crimes that involve guns.
I have one handgun. I use it for personal protection. I say "use it" because I have had to use it. I did not discharge it, but I did get the drop on the prick that broke into my house. He had a gun too....I will never give up my Fire Arm, but see no need for an AR or M4 because if I need more then the 17 rounds my 9MM has then I am most likely dead already.
So get off the "high Horse" about banning guns and do something about prosecuting those that use them in a crime. Put them in Jail for a long time, or Kill them...either way they do not belong on the street. Period!!!!!!
That Prick that broke into my house, out in 5 years and shot somebody 2 years after that....he is eligible for parole in 6 more years....he should be in for life if you ask me...
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market ended the Wednesday session on a mixed note with small caps displaying relative strength. The Nasdaq Composite (+0.5%) and Russell 2000 (+0.4%) registered modest gains, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.2%) and S&P 500 (+0.01%) underperformed.
Despite the mixed finish, the key indices traded higher across the board at the start of the session after the advance reading of second quarter GDP surpassed estimates (4.0% versus Briefing.com ... More
More Market News
3 stocks will be in the spotlight Thursday as investors try to make sense of the numbers from the sector.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'