For workers at CVS, body fat can be costly
The company will penalize employees $600 a year if they don't take part in its 'voluntary' wellness program.
Answering CVS (CVS) customers' questions about marked-down English muffins, sweeping up collapsed displays of Cadbury Creme Eggs and developing mankind's last known rolls of 35-mm film isn't demeaning, it's just work.
Having to disclose your weight and body fat levels just to get that gig is another story.
The Boston Herald disclosed CVS' new health screening policy Tuesday and revealed that workers who fail to comply would face $50-a-month surcharge. That $600-a-year penalty somewhat undermines CVS' suggestion that the new policy is "voluntary," but it's an increasingly common move by companies looking to save money by avoiding employees with costly health conditions.
Under the new federal health care insurance mandate, companies may also penalize obese workers, smokers and anyone else who doesn't participate in the company wellness plan and meet specific goals.
CVS Caremark, which has 200,000 employees, told all workers using the company insurance plan to have a doctor measure their weight, height, body fat, blood pressure and glucose and fasting lipid levels by May 1. CVS will pay for the screenings, but workers have to sign a form saying the screening is (kind of) voluntary and that they agree to let the company's insurer release results to WebMD Health Services Group. That organization, in turn, helps CVS interpret that data and determine who makes the cut.
Again, this is for a job at CVS.
But low-wage employees are already well aware of the increasing number of hoops employers are placing between them and their paychecks. On Tuesday, an unemployed Gawker reader told the site about the sheer number of online personality tests he was required to take just to be considered for a convenience-store clerk position.
Gawker decided to fill out an application for a job at Twice Daily convenience stores. It was subjected not only to questions about long hours, lengthy commutes, driving violations and drug tests, but also a "Hiring Assessment" that asked how much it agreed with the following statements, among others:
At work, I often procrastinate.
Most modern art is not really art.
I always complete a job, no matter what else is happening around me.
Variety is the spice of life.
I worry a lot about my job.
I never run out of energy.
This is what the low-end job market looks like. At least in CVS' case, a spokesman for the company told The Huffington Post that bosses won't have access to employee health care information once it's amassed.
Still, slapping a fine on employees who don't submit to health screenings puts CVS in some rare company. A 2012 Kaiser Permanente survey found that 18% of employers asked their workers to take part in a health risk assessment. Only a small share of them hit employees with a financial penalty for not completing it.
I will be boycotting CVS! this is plain discrimination and CVS should be taken to court over this as a hiring practice. CVS...YOU SUCK!
All - I am OK with charging for health insurance based on how healthy you are, but folks this is dangerous territory when that can be used as a hiring practice. What is unhealthy? I am 6' and 185 lbs and in great shape but by definition my BMI is too high. What happens when they use ugly, stupid, etc as a hiring practice? My guess is many of you would not get hired!!!
I guess that I could buy into this if research ever proved anything and after afew years doesn't change their position on what is what, in this case being too fat. All people are not fit if their numbers fall into a particular range, ie; people have different hormone markers where they are optimum. So again, it's a point the finger at so n so for weighing too much. Very discriminatory. Is the next thing going to be raising the insurance premiums for smokers or race car drivers or skiers or mountain climbers because they are prone to more danger? What about the dangers of animal rescue or being a CEO and firing 1/3 of your employees? Those people are also high risk. What is next then, people that work in high stress jobs, ie; fire fighters, police, first responders of any kind? Once this starts, it just won't end.
Have to say this sure looks like the base is being set for a Demolition Man crossed with Gattica type future...if you're not "ideal" by someone's measure you are 2nd class.
DATA PROVIDERS
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
Trending NOW
- 1.mnkd
- 2.oneok online
- 3.adbe
- 4.tsla
- 5.aeropostale
- 6.nok
- 7.gld
- 8.hlebroking
- 9.vix
- 10.nflx
About moneyNOW
MoneyNOW brings users smart, original and entertaining takes on the latest business and investing topics that are buzzing on the Web.
RECENT POSTS
Economists find that as women grow more self-reliant, marriages become more about wanting commitment than needing it.
- Obamaphone program: Dialing for fraud?
- Lone Signal lets you tweet aliens for a fee
- Russell Brand swings at 'Morning Joe' -- and scores
- 7-Eleven targeted in human smuggling raid
- Why 'Dumb Ways to Die' became a viral hit
- Red Robin ad doesn't go down well with vegetarians
- Pity the millionaire: Mansions in short supply
- Bloomberg's new crusade: Food scraps
- China eyes stockings that shoo away perverts
MARKET UPDATE
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages ended higher across the board as the S&P 500 advanced 0.8%.
Equities climbed steadily since the opening bell as investors prepared for tomorrow's policy decision from the Federal Reserve. Although chatter in recent weeks has included speculation the Fed would look to taper its asset purchases, today's broad gains suggest investors expect mostly reassuring words from Chairman Bernanke at tomorrow's press conference.
All ten sectors ended with ... More
More Market News
TOP STOCKS
Here's a list of ways to profit from the potential move from defensive to cyclical stocks.
MSN MONEY'S
- Shared
- Commented
- Viewed



