Cut corporate taxes? First figure out what they are
It's pretty clear that US businesses are socked more than their global peers, but just how much they actually pay is quite murky.
U.S. corporations pay a marginal tax rate of 35%, the highest in the world, and that puts the country at a competitive disadvantage, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others. Obama advocates slashing it to 28%.
The big problem with the marginal tax rate figure is that it can be misleading. As Fortune's Allan Sloan recently noted, the stated rate "has more holes than Swiss cheese," thanks to a plethora of loopholes.
A 2011 report by the Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found that the average effective corporate tax rate -- the tax that was actually paid -- for the 280 companies it studied was 17.3%. According to the Chamber of Commerce, that effective rate is one of the highest in the world and averages 7.6 percentage points above that of global competitors.
This raises the question of how much companies actually pay in taxes. According to Sloan, a veteran business journalist, the answer isn't as clear-cut as it ought to be. He urges readers to be skeptical of reports of companies that pay low taxes because these stories are based on the so-called current portion of taxes due.
Though some people use that figure as a proxy for federal taxes, it's calculated for the purposes of earnings and has "no connection whatsoever with what a company actually forks over to the IRS for a given year," writes Sloan. The "taxes paid" figure is no help either because it lumps local, state and federal taxes together.
At the request of Sloan and Bloomberg View, the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), an independent organization tasked with improving financial accounting and reporting standards, is undertaking a review of the rules companies have to follow for disclosing the taxes they pay. Such a standard seems to be a simple solution to the problem.
Until then, investors should view attempts at reforming the tax code with skepticism unless it's clear what is being "reformed."
Follow Jonathan Berr on Twitter @jdberr.
I will tell you the progressivies will be foaming at the thought of this! As the socialist progressive democrats are starting to realize what the republicans have been telling them, the facts have shown in the past that decreased taxes means increase jobs, income for business, foreign trade and taxes to the government !
The takers will be yelling unfair, unfair why can they make money while I only get my rent paid, my food paid for, my utilities paid for and a limited phone.
Obama screwed all the contributors for the last 5 years to get elected, mabey now he will screw the takers , the low information voters that he promised so much but can not deliver. Obama is learning that is he has to change his socialistic ways , so he can keep the system from crashing!
It will be very hard for him to change enough to not be the WORST president in history (including jimmy carter) but unless he wants a legacy of other than gay marriage and increased taxes on the rich , a failed heath care system that is already costing more and is not even fully implemented yet. And a poverty rate with double those on government dependence than any other president . Then he better start listening to those who care about freedom, jobs and freedom of government interference!!
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages began the new trading week on a slightly lower note with small caps leading the weakness. The Russell 2000 shed 0.3% while the S&P 500 slipped less than a point with six sectors ending in the red.
Equity indices began the day in negative territory with only the Nasdaq (-0.04%) making a very brief appearance in the green. After sliding through the first hour of action, the major averages reversed and spent the remainder of the session climbing off ... More
More Market News
Like many companies this winter, the fast-food giant blamed a drop in same-store sales on the weather. But could its problems be bigger than a snowbank?
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'