Why restaurants are banning shutterbugs
Some high-end eateries -- where diners can pay more than $100 each -- are telling customers not to take snapshots of their food.
Americans adore food, and just behind indulging our taste buds is a love of photographing our meals. Sometimes it seems the whole reason for Facebook (FB) is to allow friends to brag about their latest culinary adventures.
But some high-end eateries are banning or limiting photography, reports The New York Times. The reason? Despite paying as much as $175 per person for a meal, shutterbugs risk, well, bugging other customers with the habit.
Among them is the pricey eatery Momofuku Ko, where a recent diner recounted her experience when she started snapping photos. The restaurant, described by Times' reviewer Frank Bruni as "wholly inventive," charges a set price for its meals: $125 per person for dinner, $175 per person for lunch. It also warns to allow three hours for lunch, and two for dinner.
With a pricey, inventive meal that was set to last hours, the diner decided to take a shot of her shaved foie. The diner, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, then says she received a reprimand from the staff. Photos are banned at the hot eatery, she was told.
"I was definitely embarrassed," she said.
At Bouley, photo-crazed diners are escorted to the kitchen, so that they can snap away without making the dining room "like a circus," chef David Bouley told the Times.
"It’s like, here’s the sauce, here’s the plate. Snap it. We make it like an adventure for them instead of telling them no,” he added.
A prix-fixe, six-course dinner at Bouley will set you back $175. With wine pairing, it'll cost $280.
Other high-end eateries are more lax about photography -- but set limits. New York's Per Se and Le Bernardin discourage flash photography.
"Everybody wants to get their shot. They don’t care how it affects people around them," Bouley spokesman Steven Hall complained to the Times.
More in moneyNOW
Wierd to be so willing to spend big bucks on a meal. Hope these folks start a food shelf filled with decent food.
Why do some people feel the need to document every minute of their lives and share it with the world, most of which doesn't give a crap?
God, I hate smartphones and social media...
Sounds kind of stupid and foolish, and I'm not paying for or WAITING FOR my food anyplace...FOR 2 HOURS or more....But I might spend 3 hours having dinner, but that includes cocktails and then maybe after dinner brandy or something.....For probably under $75 anywhere I go....Usually less.
And who wants to see a picture of my Double Cheeseburgers and Fries at Mickey Ds...??
I would want to take a picture of my meal on a fork before I put the one bite in my mouth---------- A guy
could starve in one of these so called 5 Star resturants/////////////////////
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Reports say the generous benefactor behind the huge gratuities is a former PayPal executive.
- Chinese investors are buying up Detroit
- Mega Millions jackpot hits $344 million
- 5 reasons to think twice about a balance transfer card
- Will I have to pay taxes because of a foreclosed home?
- 5 things that won't affect your credit scores
- The 7 deadly sins of winter driving
- 8 questions to ask before Mom and Dad move in
- High deductibles fuel new worries of Obamacare sticker shock
- How to use your credit card to donate to charity
[BRIEFING.COM] With one hour remaining in today's session, the major averages continue hovering near their lows. Even though today's selling pressure has been persistent enough to short-circuit the S&P 500's rally off its opening levels, it has not been strong enough to cause a significant decline for the benchmark index.
The story has been a bit different for small-caps as the Russell 2000 trades lower by 0.8%. As mentioned earlier, the underperformance of the index is likely owed ... More
More Market News
Despite paying record fines and charging high fees, financial institutions are no longer hated.