States risk $8.4B by snubbing Medicaid expansion
Because of their mistrust of Obamacare, Texas, Georgia and others could lose huge amounts of federal funding.
Obamacare gives states and their lawmakers the right to reject the health care insurance overhaul's expansion of Medicaid benefits. But a new study is laying out the cost of doing that: a potential loss of $8.4 billion in federal funding.
By refusing to expand Medicaid coverage, states would leave about 3.6 million people who would have been covered under the Affordable Care Act with no health insurance, potentially adding to the states' costs, a study from the nonprofit Rand Corp. notes.
"Our analysis shows it's in the best economic interests of states to expand Medicaid under the terms of the federal Affordable Care Act," said Carter Price, the lead author of the study and a mathematician at the research organization.
The fact is, Obamacare remains contentious not only with individual Americans but with local governments.
As of late May, 13 states had said they wouldn't participate in the Medicaid expansion, ranging from Alabama to Maine, according to the Advisory Board. An additional six states, including Virginia and Utah, were leaning in that direction.
The federal government has pledged to cover 100% of the costs for expanding Medicaid through 2016, then scale back to 90% by 2020. Currently, the government covers 57% of Medicaid's costs, Rand notes.
The reasons for digging in their heels against the expansion? Some state lawmakers say the plan will result in a huge financial strain. Plus, many don't trust the federal government's pledge of financial assistance.
"I think that is something our state cannot afford," Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal said last year. "And even though the federal government promises to pay 100% for the first three years and 90% thereafter, I think it is probably unrealistic to expect that promise to be fulfilled in the long term."
But those states might not be looking at the bigger picture, Rand suggests. Obamacare will reduce state and local spending by as much as $18.1 billion because of increased health care coverage, the study says.
"Choosing to not expand Medicaid may turn out to be the more-costly path for state and local governments," Price said.
As MSN Money wrote in April, a state's decision to forgo Medicaid expansion could have a ripple effect on employers with 50 or more full-time workers because they're required to provide insurance under the overhaul. Companies that don't will face per-employee annual penalties of $2,000.
To get around that, companies such as Regal Entertainment Group (RGC) are cutting hours for workers rather than provide insurance under the overhaul.
Follow Aimee Picchi on Twitter at @aimeepicchi.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Reports say the generous benefactor behind the huge gratuities is a former PayPal executive.
- Chinese investors are buying up Detroit
- Mega Millions jackpot hits $344 million
- 5 reasons to think twice about a balance transfer card
- Will I have to pay taxes because of a foreclosed home?
- 5 things that won't affect your credit scores
- The 7 deadly sins of winter driving
- 8 questions to ask before Mom and Dad move in
- High deductibles fuel new worries of Obamacare sticker shock
- How to use your credit card to donate to charity
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages spent the entire session in a steady downtrend, but despite persistent selling pressure, today's losses were limited in scope. The Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq shed between 0.2% and 0.3% while the Russell 2000 lagged, falling 0.9%.
The underperformance of the Russell 2000 was likely owed in part to tax-loss selling, which tends to pick up this time of year. Small-caps often feel that pinch in a stronger fashion than large-cap issues since individual ... More
More Market News
John Stumpf acknowledges that growth has been slow, but he says he's still optimistic.