Why are gun stocks tumbling?

I always find it interesting how a liberal will reject all facts he finds distastefl and manufacture "Facts" more to their liking.  There is a thumbs down on my last post.  Naturally there is no rebutal to any of it.

DO liberals not believe we have 16 trillion national debt?

Do they not believe Obama has a 1.3 trillion +/- annual deficit.

Do they not know or beleive that Obama's tax plan raise a pitiful 70 billion (expriation of cuts for everyone making 200,000 or more?

Do they belive that that 70 billion is actually equal to 1300 (the deficti).

Of course, there is not point in wondering about people who will not refute and argument nor refute it.

So sad.

This just MORE..MSNBC...B.U.L.​L.Shytte

Go anywhere..Or online..And SEE..How ..BACKORDERED..

ALL TYPES OF GUNS ARE...

Since THE COMMNDER COMMIE   TOOK OFFICE..

GUNS and AMMO Sales Have SOARED..

Oh..Hey MSNBC..

Don't FORGET TO  B.S.About other entities..That CHairman MEOW..FEELS..Are Threatening..

KEEP TRASHING,   FORD,...WAL-MART...V​OLKSWAGEN,,   Mac DONALDS...RED LOBSTER..

And On and On..KEEP SPINNING...IT's Beyond Sardonic..and SURREAL..

which is why owning a gun

...is better than owning stock

Same old arguments pro and against firearm ownership throughout this string of comments.  Anyone want to check out a few truths, try this:

The main reason for the 2nd Amendment was to provide for an armed citizenry who would be able to resist a tyranical usurpation of the Constitution.  This is confirmed in many of the private letters and writings of the very individuals that framed the Constitution.  Further, I don't think the argument that the Amendment applied to "muskets and black power arms" holds water as these men were intelligent enough to realize that armament would improve in the future and that black powder weapons would eventually go the way of the bow and suits of armor..

The second reason for the 2nd Amendment was to allow the citizen to have a means of self defense.  Again, while not specifically stated in the Constitution,  the letters and writings of our founding fathers support this concept completely.

Gun control does NOT equal crime and violence control.  Again, I grew up in the late 40's and 50's.  In those days one could obtain a firearm off the back of a comic book by just stating that you were over 18 years old and sending in the required money.  No proof of age, no background check, no license, no federal form to fill out.  A few days later your gun showed up in the mail.  I recall one particular ad that offered a 20mm anti-tank rifle if you had the money.  Crime was at an all time low.  A murder was front page news for days or weeks and there were no gangs or drug wars, but guns were much more available and easier to obtain then ever.  Almost everyone I knew had some sort of firearm including my father, a WWII navy veteran, who had two of those awful semi-automatic .45's. 

The anti firearms folks like to rant about the 20,000 or so people killed each year by firearms.  However that number includes gang and crime related killings, suicides and justified homicides such as shootings by police officers and citizens defending themselves or their family.  

Piers Morgan made an interesting statement on TV the other day and I had to agree with him.  In Britain they have strict gun control and only have 20 to 30 gun killings a year, agreed.  However, crime in general is up just as it is in gun controlled Australia and Britain is much smaller with a much lower population than the U.S.  Consider this, as the citizens are not armed, the bad guys don't need guns either.  A knife, hunk of pipe or a club will work just fine on an unarmed citizen especially if three or four skels jump a man with a wife and kid with him or break into his home   Also, people still commit suicide and there is gang and drug violence, just no guns.

Our problem is not firearms, it is the continuing break down in our society created by the very people that we have placed in positions of trust and power who now abuse it and this nations people for their own interests.