Joblessness takes its toll on affected children
A new study says help for kids with unemployed parents often falls through the cracks, with long-term financial, emotional and academic consequences.
Being unemployed or underemployed can be scary enough from an adult perspective -- but how does it affect children?
An estimated 6.2 million children had unemployed parents last year. But a new study says that number rises to 12.1 million, or one in six children, when you factor in parental underemployment.
The study, authored by the Urban Institute and released on Tuesday by the bipartisan children advocacy group First Focus, looked at some federal initiatives meant to help unemployed or low-income families -- and found those benefits were failing to reach the affected children.
According to the report, unemployment insurance reaches only about one-third of children with at least one jobless parent. At the same time, 29% of kids with unemployed parents received help from a federal food or cash assistance program -- although their families did not receive unemployment insurance. And 35% of children affected by parental unemployment don't receive any of these benefits.
The study also found the number of families with long-term jobless issues, and who were coming to the end of their unemployment benefits, had tripled compared to pre-recession levels. Rates of poverty, meanwhile, were almost three times higher among parents who remained out of work for six months or longer.
There's an emotional and economic toll on children affected by joblessness. Along with the pressures a lack of work places on the entire family, the study says family unemployment “has a marked impact on children, including documented lower math scores, poorer school attendance, higher risk of grade repetition and suspension/expulsion.”
What would be most helpful for many affected children, the study concludes, is a stronger economic recovery. That would not only help out-of-work parents find jobs, but also fund programs to give those parents the additional skills and transitional employment needed to get them back into the workplace.
What would be most helpful for many affected children? a President who would do something about it.!
What we are seeing here is a President that does not believe in American Exceptionalism and certainly not in an individual creating wealth for himself. Why? Factually, he did not spend his early years in the US. Was educated overseas when young. Did not know people who worked for a living, did not know any inventors, likely did not know about Henry Ford and many others who had an Idea and made it happen. Likely never took American History, the real version; Wonder if he has even been to Ford's Museum? He has gone to Public Universities, Paid for by Tax Payers and donors, Never had a real job of any kind other than being a mouthpiece for certain causes which we now realize are mostly based on the concept of Wealth flowing FROM the government. Been a constitutional Law Professor,paid by taxpayers, and does not like the limits placed on government by our Constitution. Listened to years of hate filled sermons directed at America. It is a miracle he is not worse.
While technically a citizen, with a flawed life experience in America and education, he has missed the roots of America's Greatness: Individualism.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Reports say the generous benefactor behind the huge gratuities is a former PayPal executive.
- Chinese investors are buying up Detroit
- Mega Millions jackpot hits $344 million
- 5 reasons to think twice about a balance transfer card
- Will I have to pay taxes because of a foreclosed home?
- 5 things that won't affect your credit scores
- The 7 deadly sins of winter driving
- 8 questions to ask before Mom and Dad move in
- High deductibles fuel new worries of Obamacare sticker shock
- How to use your credit card to donate to charity
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages spent the entire session in a steady downtrend, but despite persistent selling pressure, today's losses were limited in scope. The Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq shed between 0.2% and 0.3% while the Russell 2000 lagged, falling 0.9%.
The underperformance of the Russell 2000 was likely owed in part to tax-loss selling, which tends to pick up this time of year. Small-caps often feel that pinch in a stronger fashion than large-cap issues since individual ... More
More Market News
John Stumpf acknowledges that growth has been slow, but he says he's still optimistic.