Why media's Boston Marathon miscues matter
With the mainstream outlets under severe financial pressure, major coverage errors didn't help their cause.
Newer, nimbler companies such as Twitter are emerging as the source for breaking news, and luckily for them, they don't need to spend a nickel on writing or editing. Of course, were it not for the mainstream media, these sites couldn't exist. It is the ultimate irony.
Still, the mainstream media as we know it is changing. News Corp., which is run by tycoon Rupert Murdoch, is in the midst of severing its slow-growing publishing business from its TV and movie divisions.
The New York Post, a tabloid that has lost money for years, will no longer be able to count on profitable businesses such as Fox News to subsidize it. That means the next time the paper makes grievous errors, as it did in the Boston Marathon story, its corporate masters may be less inclined to clean up its mess. News Corp.'s shutdown of the News of the World after a phone-hacking scandal in the U.K. proves this point.
This represents a sea change for Murdoch, who for decades has been motivated by a desire to increase his influence more than his shareholders' returns. In 2007, he bought Dow Jones & Co. for $5 billion, paying a 67% premium for a company that no one else wanted at the time.
People who can invest in the news business are often motivated by ideology, such as the Koch Brothers, who reportedly want to buy the Tribune newspapers. Then there's Warren Buffett, who's so wealthy that he can afford to have an investment horizon of "forever."
Time Warner's CNN, whose Boston Marathon coverage has been ridiculed for its errors, unfortunately, isn't so lucky. The company is hoping for a better performance from CNN. According to Project for Excellence in Journalism, the all-news channel earned about $413 million in profit on $1.1 billion in revenue in 2012, well behind the $986 million in profit and $1.8 billion in revenue earned by Fox News.
CNN has a longer leash than the New York Post, but it can't afford to botch big stories, either, because its needs all the advertisers it can get.
The media's miscues in Boston were unfortunate but hardly surprising. Just look at the gossip news. Three years ago, William Shatner had to deny a ludicrous story that he was a worth $600 million because he had been paid in Priceline.com (PCLN) shares for appearing in the company's commercials. A clearly annoyed Shatner wound up issuing a statement over Twitter denying the whole thing. Everyone got a good laugh.
Unfortunately, Abdulrahman Al Alharbi's situation is not amusing in the least. Although he was never implicated by name, the Saudi college student's name was dragged through the mud by the New York Post among others in connection with the bombings in Boston.
If the media can't get the little stories right, it has no hope for the big ones.
Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market capped the trading week with losses across the major averages. The S&P 500 fell 0.5% to surrender its weekly gain, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.7%) and Russell 2000 (-0.9%) underperformed. The two indices posted respective losses of 0.8% and 0.6% for the week.
Equity indices were pressured from the get-go after several heavyweights disappointed the market with their earnings and/or guidance, which led to some broader profit-taking. After ... More
More Market News
The idea of US crude being a shelter from turmoil abroad may not be as far fetched as it seems.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'