Billionaire investors trade barbs on live TV
Carl Icahn and Bill Ackman let loose with personal insults, salty language and the built-up tension that comes from years of animosity.
The two billionaires duked it out in an amazing show of verbal hostility on live television Friday, letting loose with a torrent of insults and obscenities. It was an unprecedented spectacle, one that the financial world won't forget anytime soon.
And the stock at the center of it all, Herbalife (HLF), went nuts during the conversation.
The two investors have been fighting for years, going back to 2003, when Ackman's former company was under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Icahn bought Ackman's shares in a real estate company called Hallwood Realty, but the issue turned into a nasty legal battle later.
There's so much animosity between the two, in fact, that New York restaurants know not to seat them near each other, according to The New York Times.
The two are feuding again over Herbalife, a stock that Ackman has made a well-publicized bet against. Ackman has called the company a pyramid scheme. News reports later said that Icahn had bought a position in Herbalife -- something Icahn has not publicly confirmed.
The tension between the two has been building for days. In an interview with Bloomberg television, Icahn said he didn't respect Ackman and challenged his "holier than thou" attitude. Ackman went on CNBC to defend himself, and Icahn joined in as well.
Here are the best zingers from the conversation Friday, which was hosted by CNBC's Scott Wapner:
Icahn: "I've really sorta had it with this guy Ackman. . . . He's like the crybaby of the school yard."
Icahn: "He's like the quintessential example of on Wall Street, if you want a friend, get a dog."
Ackman: "I was concerned about Carl Icahn because Carl Icahn unfortunately does not have a good reputation of being a handshake guy."
Ackman: "This is not an honest guy, this is not a guy who keeps his word, and this is a guy who takes advantage of little people."
Icahn (to Wapner): "I'm not going to talk about my Herbalife position because you want to bully me. I'm going to talk about what I want to talk about. . . . I'm never going on a show with you again, that's for damn sure."
Icahn (about Ackman): "I couldn't figure out if he was the most sanctimonious guy I'd ever met in my life or the most arrogant."
Icahn: "I wouldn't have an investment with Ackman if you paid me to do it. . . . I made a huge mistake getting involved with him. As far as I'm concerned, the guy is a major loser."
Ackman: Icahn "either has a bad memory or he has trouble with the truth. . . . He is not used to someone standing up to him."
Icahn: "I wouldn't do business with you if you were the last man on Earth"
Icahn also used plenty of salty language on the call, to the point that Wapner reminded him that he was on live television. Icahn responded that when CNBC producers asked him to go on they air, they told him he could say whatever he wanted. And he certainly did.
It was jaw-dropping television, and Twitter lit up with people shocked by the conversation. "Best television since Frazier-Ali fights," one said. CNBC asked viewers in a poll who won, and by the early afternoon Ackman was the clear favorite.
More on moneyNOW
- Twinkies will be back -- eventually
- Restaurants are banning food shutterbugs
- Not a college grad? No recovery for you
They don't like each other, so the **** what? They don't pay my bills.
When the rich give donations and charity gifts to the legit individual poor, then that would be something to report about. Until then I could care less that these two billionaires are hagging each other..
Help The Individual Poor. Donate a $$$$ gift.. to help them.....
Billionaires - I would bet - mostly fall under the "sociopath" or "psychopath" label if one were to have them evaluated by professionals. You see, in order to get that far up the food chain - one would have to do all kinds of terrible things to people and be able to sleep at night. Most of us would be very troubled by our actions and would need to make up for it. These guys - please! They are the 1% of the 1% who own almost everything in the world. A recent study showed that it would take $75 billion to stop starvation once and for all. Imagine if one of these creeps were to give up $1 billion each. We would only need 73 more of them to give up a billion each to end it. Or we could just end all war. Ooops! That would cost these ubber rich even more money - sorry for suggesting it.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
More than 70 percent of the Class of 2012 took out loans. Oh, and they're seeing high unemployment, too.
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
- Should the US scrap the debt ceiling?
- Will new mortgage rules mean fewer lenders?
- Why GM, Chrysler are riding high
- Survey: Dashboard lights fail to send right message
- Can you opt out of Medicare?
[BRIEFING.COM] The drive for five continued today and it was a success. For the fifth straight session, the S&P 500 ended lower. Like the previous four sessions, though, the losses were fairly modest in scope. The S&P 500 declined 0.4%, bringing its total loss for the five sessions to 22 points or 1.2%. All in all, that still qualifies as a pretty tame slide considering the S&P 500 had risen 150 points, or 9.1%, over the previous eight weeks.
Today's ... More
More Market News
The retailer labels the character's fake memoir as non-fiction. This comes weeks after it categorized the the Bible as fiction.