Watch what you say online, Netflix

The company gets in hot water with regulators about a Facebook post, sparking a wide-ranging debate over what constitutes public disclosure in the digital age.

By Jason Notte Dec 7, 2012 2:28PM

Credit: Paul Sakuma/AP
Caption: The exterior of Netflix headquarters is seen in Los Gatos, CalifFor much of Friday morning, the business and tech communities have been reading over the following 43 words from Netflix (NFLX) chief executive Reed Hastings and wondering whether they warranted the heap of trouble they've caused his company with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

"Congrats to Ted Sarandos, and his amazing content licensing team. Netflix monthly viewing exceeded 1 billion hours for the first time ever in June. When House of Cards and Arrested Development debut, we'll blow these records away. Keep going, Ted, we need even more!"

Hastings posted that pat on the back for his chief content officer to his Facebook page 

on July 3. It was shared at least 36 times on Facebook (FB) alone and made the rounds on Twitter and in publications like TechCrunch. Netflix stock just happened to rise 13% the day of the posting and there was no press release or filing with the SEC noting those viewing numbers. That got the regulators' attention.


Hastings says that on Wednesday, the SEC tapped him on the shoulder with a Wells Notice -- a warning that the commission was suggesting civil action against Netflix over the post. In the SEC's eyes, Hastings violated a fair disclosure regulation (or "Reg FD" in the biz) because he didn't provide equal access to investors and his news wasn't issued "publicly" with an 8-K filing or press release.


Oh, the howls that followed. Business Insider writer Jay Yarow called the SEC's "attack" on Netflix "ridiculous" in its overreach. His Twitter followers were less than unanimous in their support, and that's kind of the way it went on Facebook, Twitter and elsewhere for much of Friday.


One side echoed Brad Loncar of Xconomy and asserted that the SEC needs to get with the times and pick bigger fights. The other sounded more like Chris Ciaccia of The Street, who noted that the SEC is just performing its function as a regulatory body and might consider more action like this in the future as executives shun proper channels for posts and tweets. Tesla Motors (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk toed that thin line on Monday, when he tweeted that Tesla "was narrowly cash flow positive last week" instead of issuing a release or 8-K statement.


Before the tech world started listening to itself talk and debating how the SEC should do his job, Hastings used his Thursday post to divert credit for his company's July share price increase away from his post and to a Citigroup (C) report issued the night before. He also made an argument for social media as public disclosure:


First, we think posting to over 200,000 people is very public, especially because many of my subscribers are reporters and bloggers.
Second, while we think my public Facebook post is public, we don’t currently use Facebook and other social media to get material information to investors; we usually get that information out in our extensive investor letters, press releases and SEC filings. We think the fact of 1 billion hours of viewing in June was not “material” to investors, and we had blogged a few weeks before that we were serving nearly 1 billion hours per month.

About the last thing Netflix needs right now is the SEC breathing down its back. Activist investor Carl Icahn bought a 10% stake in the company back in October and started making noise about folding it into Amazon (AMZN) or Apple (AAPL). That made the company adopt a "poison pill" strategy that would flood the market with shares if any one person's stake was greater than 10%.


It's racked up $5 billion in debt buying content from DreamWorks Animation (DWA), the Weinstein Company and elsewhere, it just reported an 88% drop in revenue last quarter and reportedly paid $300 million to $350 million for Disney content that won't be Netflix exclusive until 2016. Amazon's copying its $8-a-month streaming subscription rate, Redbox's new streaming service offers a streaming/DVD bundle for that price and Netflix is just trying to convince subscribers it won't raise prices any time soon.


Is the SEC's timing ideal? No. But does a chief executive's belief that a 244,000-"friend" social media following (or about half that it Musk's case) equals a "public" forum make it settled law in the eyes of regulators? Absolutely not. The nerds can wail, cry and tap out polemics all they'd like, but until the merits of social media are argued successfully in front of the SEC, chief executives might want to heed the lesson the average teen tends to learn the hard way: Watch what you say online.


More from Money Now



2Comments
Dec 7, 2012 2:55PM
avatar
There is waste in all organizations including our government. We also have brains, and with those brains, we should be able to cut out the waste and inject needed funds to make it better. All cuts, or all new taxes is as dumb as our congressmen taking a pledge to blindly follow an idea without any current input. 
Now lets consider our safety. We have daily environmental safety, and national threat safety, and the constant threat brought to us via our greedy business people. We need the protection from all of them, but we need to understand where and who the threat is coming from. There is so much waste in unneeded programs in our national security system, and with an unbiast look, alot of our tax money could be saved. Environmental dangers, need to be looked at and judged as to how they effect us today and later. If we need to correct the problem, we will need to find its source and charge the culprets.
Taxes, well while smart cuts should get us started towards a balanced budget, some additional income will also help in getting rid of our debt before it is so large, it will cripple our markets. All should help with these problems. I feel that most of these started in congress, over years of greedy selfish law makers and the fix should start with them. How about an across the board 30% cut in their wages, and retirements. Their health care could also be trimmed, just like ours. Free life time health care for 12 years of service! I'd like a plan like that and I'm no less deserving than them. I do think they call this plan I'm talking of as The National Health Care Program.
Now we can deal with past tax cuts. Make them go away, and start taxing the hidden money like capital gains. Make a $2000 per tax payer deduction, and the rest taxed as ordinary income. This will hit those that are under taxed, and loaded, pay a larger of their income. They have taken advantage of years of unfair breaks, and they need to shoulder some of the debt.
Dec 9, 2012 3:59AM
avatar

Life is great!

 

Chris Van Hollen & Elizabeth Warren in 2016 & 2020!

 

God bless America!

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

DATA PROVIDERS

Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.

Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.

Trending NOW

What’s this?

MARKET UPDATE

[BRIEFING.COM]

  • A stronger dollar index weighted on the commodities space today.
  • Dec gold and Dec silver fell deeper into negative territory, trading as low as $1263.10 per ounce and $19.11 per ounce, respectively.
  • Unable to gain momentum, both metals settled with 1.7% losses, with gold closing at $1264.90 per ounce and silver closing at $19.16 per ounce. 
  • Oct crude oil fell below the $93 per barrel level. It trended lower after pulling back from a session ... More

MSN MONEY'S