Wal-Mart wants to save the Twinkie
The retailing giant is one of several bidders reportedly interested in purchasing parts of Hostess Brands.
According to Bloomberg News, the largest retailer is making a run for the assets of Hostess Brands, the bankrupt maker of Twinkies, Sno-Balls and Wonder Bread. Other bidders include grocery chain Kroger Co. (KR) and Grupo Bimbo, the Mexican conglomerate whose brands include Entenmanns's baked goods and Thomas' English muffins. Some of the bids are for all the company's assets and others are for lines of business and individual products, the news service said.
The interest is a sign that Hostess, which has begun to liquidate its assets after unionized workers balked at agreeing to additional concessions, will live to fight another day in some form or another.
The 18,000 Hostess employees who lost their job shouldn't rejoice quite yet. Any new owner of Hostess or its businesses will not be bound by any agreements that prior management made with the unions. A new buyer may demand wage concessions as steep, if not steeper, than the ones demanded by the current owners. Sadly, the $1.8 million that the bankruptcy court approved as retention bonuses for top executives will be paid no matter what.
Members of the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Union say they are not to blame for the company's demise. Its website argues that its members dedicated their working lives to their work and had to "watch helplessly as the company was run into the ground, over and over again." Ironically, I attended a conference on corporate restructuring a few years ago where Hostess was touted as a success story.
Even if Hostess had the best labor relations in the world, the company would face a tough road ahead. For one thing, the costs for ingredients have skyrocketed this year as U.S. crops withered following the worst drought in more than five decades. America's dietary habits have also changed in the wake of soaring rates of obesity.
Take Twinkies. When I grew up in the 1970s and 80s, parents would think nothing of putting the creme-filled spongecake in a kid's school lunch. Today's parents would think twice before letting their children eat something so unhealthy.
Hostess products such as Twinkies are like newspapers. People like them in theory, but can't remember the last time they bought one. That needs to change if Hostess hopes to survive.
--Jonathan Berr does not own shares of the listed stocks. Follow him on Twitter @jdberr
Twinkies don't make kids fat....I grew up in the 60's, 70's, and early 80's and kids were not fat like they are today. One thing I would do is get rid of the scooters in supermarkets (elderly and truely handicapped on get to use them) and food stamps would not buy twinkies, soda, ribeyes and we go back to commodities.
You can feed 4 times the folks with the commodities my blind aunt used to recieve ie. peanut butter, cheese, rice, beans, powdered milk, etc. You want soda, twinkies, steak, there's and app for that.....and it WORKS!
Wal-Mart and Twinkies - what a great fit! Think about it. The people who consume the most Twinkies are probably Wal-Mart customers. One stop shopping!
But I also agree wholeheartedly with Michael DeSantis. You made me nostalgic for the days of Kool-Aid, baloney sandwiches and playing outside with all the kids on the block until dark. Great times and memories!! And yes, we were skinny, healthy kids who went right to sleep because we were pooped!
Supply and demand, period. If Hostess is done, someone else will pick up their end of the market share. If it takes 18,000 more workers to make enough cakes to feed the American appetite, then some other cake maker will add 18,000 jobs.
It is far from the end of the world. 18,000 Hostess employees decided that their job wasnt worth the pay. Somewhere, a bunch of folks will be celebrating new jobs making whatever Hostess decided not to make.
Top executives usually get big bucks for not doing what they need to do. Isn't that the American way as we know it today. They get more the people doing the job get less and less as do the rest of the consumers.
Maybe they need to take the 1.8 million, fire the executives and pay the people who have extended them credit. DUH!!! think that would make any sense at all? I think as much as what they are doing.
As to why the bonuses during bankruptcy, that is decided by the owners representatives which are the board of directors and stockholders which include the CEO and of course the bankruptcy judge................ the unions had gotten their pay and bonuses according to a CONTRACT which was forced on ownership ... and then wanted more ........... they got their just deserts, now a good reason to reorganize with far less labor and more machines .......... machines are always better than the usual unskilled labor, no sick days, no hangovers, no maternity /paternity leave, no bad attitudes, no unions, no vacations, no HR dept, no suits, no workman's comp, no healthcare, less bookkeeping and payroll dept .... and on and on.
The real tearjerker is that unskilled humans haven't faced the fact that they are infinitely replaceable, and that stupidity is WHY they are replaceable!
My son was in regional distribution for Hostess. He acknowledged the mistakes made by management but his job was not made miserable by the decisions of the people upstairs. When he could not get his union people to do their jobs and not be able to do anything about it, his service to his customers suffered and he began losing outlets for Hostess products. This affected sales and the profitability of the company.
When did it become a crime in this country to get educated, trained and succeed as management, climb the ladder due to your abilities get paid for these abilities? All you hear about are the union workers that lost their jobs but there are many management people that lost their jobs, also. Unions did their memebership well when they viewed the members working with management creating success for all. When they lost sight of the synergy necessary between workers and management working together for success and created an "us against them" mentality, everyone loses.
Copyright © 2014 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
[BRIEFING.COM] The stock market punctuated July with a broad-based retreat that sent the S&P 500 lower by 2.0% with all ten sectors ending in the red. The benchmark index posted a monthly decline of 1.5%, while the Russell 2000 (-2.3%) underperformed to end the month lower by 6.1%.
To get a better feel for what led to today's retreat, we'd like to look back to Wednesday, when the market had ample reason to rally, but did not. Instead, it ended basically flat after a sloppy day of ... More
More Market News
Investors are anxious to see if hiring can maintain its strong pace in the second half of the year.
MUST-SEE ON MSN
- Video: Easy DIY smoked meats at home
A charcuterie master shares his process for cold-smoking meat at home.
- Jetpacks about to go mainstream
- Weird things covered by home insurance
- Bing: 70 percent of adults report 'digital eye strain'