The Social Security proposal you need to know about
Lawmakers have suggested a switch to 'chained CPI' to reduce deficits. That could affect how the government calculates Social Security benefits in the future.
It sounds about as exciting as skim milk, but the phrase "chained CPI" could play a role in fiscal cliff negotiations -- and it could impact your Social Security payments.
Republicans are reportedly suggesting a shift to chained CPI as one way of dealing with the deficit, and President Obama appears open to the move. That could impact the way Social Security benefits are calculated in the future.
To understand chained CPI, it's important to get a refresher on the standard CPI, or the Consumer Price Index. This index tracks price changes of goods and services in some 200 categories. The Bureau of Labor Statistics defines the index as "a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services."
The government uses the CPI as one basis for adjusting dollar values on Social Security payments. During times of inflation, for example, the index rises and Social Security payments get cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs.
"Chained CPI" doesn't just look at the prices of goods and services. It goes deeper into consumer choices and relative price changes. For an example, says the BLS, consider differences in the costs of pork and beef.
If the price of pork goes up while the price of beef doesn't, shoppers might shift away from pork to beef, the Bureau notes. Chained CPI accounts for this type of consumer substitution, while the standard CPI does not.
And here's the important part: In this example, chained CPI would rise, but not by as much as the standard CPI. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office says the chained CPI has grown at a slower rate than the traditional CPI, by an average of 0.3 percentage points annually over the past 10 years.
So what does that mean to you, the taxpaying consumer? Switching to a chained CPI will reduce spending on Social Security and federal pensions while increasing revenue for the government. The differences between the CPI and chained CPI may seem small, but they can add up. As the Columbia Journalism Review points out, the chained CPI "cuts spending and raises revenue, the twin strategies for reducing the federal deficit."
There are estimates the chained CPI could bring in hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for the government while generating billions more in revenue. The unanswered question, though, is at what cost.
In a recent letter to Congress, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare urged lawmakers to oppose any deficit reductions plans that would involve the chained CPI.
"This cut would reduce projected benefits for the oldest and most vulnerable Americans who would be least able to afford it," says the letter, which also notes that Social Security Administration officials estimate the chained CPI would bring about a 0.3 percentage drop compared to current cost-of-living adjustments.
"This reduced COLA would result in a decrease of about $130 per year (0.9%) in Social Security benefits for a typical 65 year old," The letter continues. "By the time that senior reaches age 95, the annual benefit cut will be almost $1,400, a 9.2% reduction from currently scheduled benefits. Remarkably, this is a benefit reduction that slightly exceeds the one month’s benefit for the average retiree."
The Christian Science Monitor says supporters of the chained CPI believe it’s a better way to measure inflation and reduce the deficit -- especially as a growing number of Baby Boomers retire and go on Social Security.
But there's also a middle ground in the debate, according to the Monitor: those who argue that the change "should be cushioned by supplementing benefits for older retirees."
More from Money Now
1. No raises when local government cannot.
2. All federal employees (including Congress and President) went on Obamacare.
3. Federal government employees retired when we can. Age 65.
4. All federal government employees who are behind on their taxes actually paid them.
We struggle and cut where ever we can just to keep our companies alive. Why is the federal government different?
Aww quit your bitchen! These crooks can do as they please with impunity because you've shown them that you will not vote them out of office no matter what they pull!!
Lokk what you morons did in the last election... Unhappy with the government and congress' performance or lack thereof....you put everything back in the "same proportions as before the election!!!
Thats the definition of insanity! Ya made your bed, now shut up and sleep in it you ignorant jerks!!
Maybe tomorrow should be the end..
Really why do people think they will last another 5 10 15 100 1000 years... At the rate we are going the world will puke.
This is just the beginning. They still have to find a way to get ahold of our IRA's and 401K's. They have already raised taxes on the poor. They have done away with the 10% tax bracket and made the 15% bracket the lowest. They have been coming up with ways to get money from baby boomers all our lives. Don't think their done because we are retiring.
I believe that all of our congressmen and women, including the Senators should be limited to
2 year terms. And someone needs to make that a referendum to be voted on by all of us common folks.
And they all should have to pay their own health insurance and all of their travel expenses!!!
It is pretty obvious that our current President and all of the congress people have no clue of
what is in the constitution, all they want to do is , re-write it to suit their personal needs.
Shame on all of us citizens for just keeping on putting up with this shameful mess that these
people keep shoving down our throats. Maybe we need to have another revolution, as our forefathers did
to have our freedom from British rule!!!!
I am another very frustrated retired senior citizen who is very sick of this country's situation!!!!
Since our COLA is now computed on only 1 quarter of the year, while prices change 4 quarters a year, we are already being cheated. I guess that since we've already done our part, we're not important any more.
People...we have to cut spending.....Hello. Everyone says.hea don't cut my spending in SS, don't cut the military....don't cut welfare...yada, yada, yada.
We can't keep spending money we don't have......PERIOD.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
Reports say the generous benefactor behind the huge gratuities is a former PayPal executive.
- Chinese investors are buying up Detroit
- Mega Millions jackpot hits $344 million
- 5 reasons to think twice about a balance transfer card
- Will I have to pay taxes because of a foreclosed home?
- 5 things that won't affect your credit scores
- The 7 deadly sins of winter driving
- 8 questions to ask before Mom and Dad move in
- High deductibles fuel new worries of Obamacare sticker shock
- How to use your credit card to donate to charity
[BRIEFING.COM] The major averages spent the entire session in a steady downtrend, but despite persistent selling pressure, today's losses were limited in scope. The Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq shed between 0.2% and 0.3% while the Russell 2000 lagged, falling 0.9%.
The underperformance of the Russell 2000 was likely owed in part to tax-loss selling, which tends to pick up this time of year. Small-caps often feel that pinch in a stronger fashion than large-cap issues since individual ... More
More Market News
John Stumpf acknowledges that growth has been slow, but he says he's still optimistic.