The Social Security proposal you need to know about
Lawmakers have suggested a switch to 'chained CPI' to reduce deficits. That could affect how the government calculates Social Security benefits in the future.
It sounds about as exciting as skim milk, but the phrase "chained CPI" could play a role in fiscal cliff negotiations -- and it could impact your Social Security payments.
Republicans are reportedly suggesting a shift to chained CPI as one way of dealing with the deficit, and President Obama appears open to the move. That could impact the way Social Security benefits are calculated in the future.
To understand chained CPI, it's important to get a refresher on the standard CPI, or the Consumer Price Index. This index tracks price changes of goods and services in some 200 categories. The Bureau of Labor Statistics defines the index as "a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services."
The government uses the CPI as one basis for adjusting dollar values on Social Security payments. During times of inflation, for example, the index rises and Social Security payments get cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs.
"Chained CPI" doesn't just look at the prices of goods and services. It goes deeper into consumer choices and relative price changes. For an example, says the BLS, consider differences in the costs of pork and beef.
If the price of pork goes up while the price of beef doesn't, shoppers might shift away from pork to beef, the Bureau notes. Chained CPI accounts for this type of consumer substitution, while the standard CPI does not.
And here's the important part: In this example, chained CPI would rise, but not by as much as the standard CPI. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office says the chained CPI has grown at a slower rate than the traditional CPI, by an average of 0.3 percentage points annually over the past 10 years.
So what does that mean to you, the taxpaying consumer? Switching to a chained CPI will reduce spending on Social Security and federal pensions while increasing revenue for the government. The differences between the CPI and chained CPI may seem small, but they can add up. As the Columbia Journalism Review points out, the chained CPI "cuts spending and raises revenue, the twin strategies for reducing the federal deficit."
There are estimates the chained CPI could bring in hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for the government while generating billions more in revenue. The unanswered question, though, is at what cost.
In a recent letter to Congress, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare urged lawmakers to oppose any deficit reductions plans that would involve the chained CPI.
"This cut would reduce projected benefits for the oldest and most vulnerable Americans who would be least able to afford it," says the letter, which also notes that Social Security Administration officials estimate the chained CPI would bring about a 0.3 percentage drop compared to current cost-of-living adjustments.
"This reduced COLA would result in a decrease of about $130 per year (0.9%) in Social Security benefits for a typical 65 year old," The letter continues. "By the time that senior reaches age 95, the annual benefit cut will be almost $1,400, a 9.2% reduction from currently scheduled benefits. Remarkably, this is a benefit reduction that slightly exceeds the one month’s benefit for the average retiree."
The Christian Science Monitor says supporters of the chained CPI believe it’s a better way to measure inflation and reduce the deficit -- especially as a growing number of Baby Boomers retire and go on Social Security.
But there's also a middle ground in the debate, according to the Monitor: those who argue that the change "should be cushioned by supplementing benefits for older retirees."
More from Money Now
They should all be locked into a room, forget Christmas , and New Years! It's time they all become accountable, and find a way of reaching a mutual agreement (solution) that will benefit the country! Not their individual Party!!!
RETURN OUR MONEY : THE $ 1,5 TRILLON TAKEN OUT OF the SOCIAL SECURITY "Surplus" in 2004 and used for the BAIL-ouT of AIG and the banks..WE SENIOR Want and NEED our MONEY Back plus we spend it in our City/State ..we donot send iT out of the country!
WE Seniorplayed/waited at Congress gameplan for our 8-years...NO more VOLUNTEER, and tighted out belts , no more vanned beans, we have lost our home.jobs, etcetc...
The Colalast year DIDNOT bring us Senior UP .IT brought us Down (the landlord increased the rent) etcetc,And The DHS CUT out Foodstamps/Snap by $30.00 //And the SS raise this 2013 of 1,6% also is taken OUt of the FOODSTAMPS/Snap...so we Senior have not gain anything JUST COST TO TAXPAYER of PRINTING,MAILING and COST of employee (State/Fedreal).CUT the Printing in washintgon and in your STATE, save more then Millions. PLUS WE SENIOR WORKED for over 30-40 yearsTO EAN our RETIREMENT...with Interest.
I'm so sick of hearing, don't cut SS! These seniors, my mom included, receive so much more than was ever put in, it's almost criminal. My mom's been collecting 20 years now and I estimate she's received 5 times, or more, than was ever put in for her. She may live another 5-10 years on top of that. There's no way that type of return could be guaranteed in this day and age through the market.
EVERYTHING the federal govt. spends money on needs to be frozen or reduced -WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY! WE CAN'T KEEP BORROWING 30-50% MORE THAN WE TAKE IN TAXES TO PAY ALL THESE BENEFITS! I really don't know why people don't understand that!
Congress has been using Social Security as a slush fund for years and now they keep screwing
with in one way or another. The benefits or Social Security and Medicare have been for the most
part, earned by Seniors. LEAVE IT ALONE!! Being retired military, they are doing now everything
they possibly can to screw the retired military with possible cuts in benefits.
I say to HELL with all of the elected as they are morons.
Stop taxing our SS benefits. Why are we punished for wanting to or need to work after retirement when we worked all of our lives and paid into the system along with our employers only to have our SS benefits taxed because we exceed a taxable income level that is not only unfair, but takes a valuable new taxpayer out of the work force. Many retirees have the opportunity to work and put their valuable knowledge back in the work place. Further more, they pay income taxes, SS taxes and medicare taxes which by the way, are not used to pay our medicare payments. The money go's into the medicare pot and lost by the taxpayer. That's ok, but at least give us retirees a chance to live a little better. One answer is to raise the taxable amount to a reasonable figure.
For anyone who is not familiar with this tax, this is how it works. If you and your spouse have a taxable income of $32,000.00 or more, the Govt taxes your SS benefit up to 85% . This is why i quit working my part time job. Big brother doe's not want to let little brother get ahead. Ask the lawmakers of our great country to give something back to us and they turn a deaf ear. I don't know how many of you retirees need to work because of a relative who lives with you and cannot be claimed on your tax return or your health insurance is out of sight or whatever reason that the extra income helps to defray costs in your life, Please STOP the robbery of our SS benefits. MARIO
Cash goes by... so quickly
so quickly when my COLA's gone
And bills get paid... so slowly
So slowly I could die
Without my Medicare and SSI
Just say goodbye.
I neeeeeed that dough
I neeeeed that dough.
but there it goes... so quickly out the door....
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters (click for restrictions). Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Financial Information.
TGI Friday's and Applebee's are among restaurants accused of swapping top-shelf booze for cheap alternatives.
- Charles Ramsey gets burgers for life, but no Big Macs
- Shotgun wedding for Saks and Neiman Marcus?
- Yum aims to fatten up by doubling Taco Bell sales
- Mike Bloomberg's next career: Taxi magnate?
- Oklahoma senators change tune on disaster relief
- At software giant SAP, autism is an asset
- Target blames weather for soggy results
- Chick-fil-A thrown back into gay marriage debate
- Oklahoma tornado losses could top $2 billion
- July crude oil traded in negative territory today following China's HSBC Flash Manufacturing PMI data that showed a first contractionary reading in seven months. The energy component dipped to a session low of $92.21 per barrel in morning action but managed to erase most of the earlier losses as prices rallied to a session high of $94.35 per barrel heading into the close. Crude oil settled just 0.1% lower at $94.14 per barrel.
- June natural gas opened floor trade in ... More
More Market News
The home improvement company believes the housing market is recovering, but the Fed chief isn't so sure about the economy.