The Social Security proposal you need to know about
Lawmakers have suggested a switch to 'chained CPI' to reduce deficits. That could affect how the government calculates Social Security benefits in the future.
It sounds about as exciting as skim milk, but the phrase "chained CPI" could play a role in fiscal cliff negotiations -- and it could impact your Social Security payments.
Republicans are reportedly suggesting a shift to chained CPI as one way of dealing with the deficit, and President Obama appears open to the move. That could impact the way Social Security benefits are calculated in the future.
To understand chained CPI, it's important to get a refresher on the standard CPI, or the Consumer Price Index. This index tracks price changes of goods and services in some 200 categories. The Bureau of Labor Statistics defines the index as "a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services."
The government uses the CPI as one basis for adjusting dollar values on Social Security payments. During times of inflation, for example, the index rises and Social Security payments get cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs.
"Chained CPI" doesn't just look at the prices of goods and services. It goes deeper into consumer choices and relative price changes. For an example, says the BLS, consider differences in the costs of pork and beef.
If the price of pork goes up while the price of beef doesn't, shoppers might shift away from pork to beef, the Bureau notes. Chained CPI accounts for this type of consumer substitution, while the standard CPI does not.
And here's the important part: In this example, chained CPI would rise, but not by as much as the standard CPI. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office says the chained CPI has grown at a slower rate than the traditional CPI, by an average of 0.3 percentage points annually over the past 10 years.
So what does that mean to you, the taxpaying consumer? Switching to a chained CPI will reduce spending on Social Security and federal pensions while increasing revenue for the government. The differences between the CPI and chained CPI may seem small, but they can add up. As the Columbia Journalism Review points out, the chained CPI "cuts spending and raises revenue, the twin strategies for reducing the federal deficit."
There are estimates the chained CPI could bring in hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for the government while generating billions more in revenue. The unanswered question, though, is at what cost.
In a recent letter to Congress, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare urged lawmakers to oppose any deficit reductions plans that would involve the chained CPI.
"This cut would reduce projected benefits for the oldest and most vulnerable Americans who would be least able to afford it," says the letter, which also notes that Social Security Administration officials estimate the chained CPI would bring about a 0.3 percentage drop compared to current cost-of-living adjustments.
"This reduced COLA would result in a decrease of about $130 per year (0.9%) in Social Security benefits for a typical 65 year old," The letter continues. "By the time that senior reaches age 95, the annual benefit cut will be almost $1,400, a 9.2% reduction from currently scheduled benefits. Remarkably, this is a benefit reduction that slightly exceeds the one month’s benefit for the average retiree."
The Christian Science Monitor says supporters of the chained CPI believe it’s a better way to measure inflation and reduce the deficit -- especially as a growing number of Baby Boomers retire and go on Social Security.
But there's also a middle ground in the debate, according to the Monitor: those who argue that the change "should be cushioned by supplementing benefits for older retirees."
More from Money Now
OK I'm joining MILLIONS of others in saying "I AM TOTALLY DONE with the AZZWIPERMORONIC LIAR OBAMA and HIS BULL CRAP ILK"
ALL these MORONS can do is rob PETER--while they are playing with him--to SCREW PAUL !!
THE above is NOT a CUT in SPENDING it is a MANULIPATION --that's all it is--
A CUT would be REDUCING the MORONS SALARY to $1000.00 a MONTH and another CUT is REDUCING the MORONS in CONGRESS SPIFS to -0- ZERO DOLLARS--let them and the MORON in our WHITE HOUSE pay for HEALTHCARE,MAILINGS and FOOD---
I think it a crock of **** Congress and the prez should cut their pay in half and leave social security alone.
Until they actually cut their bloated Government expenses by a real, substancial amount, those bustards have NO business wanting to cut or curb anyone with a income below 100k. They want to ban your guns BEFORE the people get tired of BOTH partys' B.S. and we start ELIMINATING their ability to steal our air.
The Government needs to fear its' people NOT the people fear its Government. It's time to take our country back from the thieves more commonly called Democrats AND Republicans.
This is BS !! They have raided SS for years with IOUs and now are trying to pull this . How SHAME FULL bunch of disgusting jerks represent this country . They are elitists who have NO idea how people on SS live . And if thats not BAD enough they have NO idea how most Americans live in this country . And I'm referring to true middle class . Not people making over 60K a year . The day will come when these so called representatives get run out of this country . The sooner the better .
Lay off of Social Security,We get picked on morek here lately. Start dealing with Congress and the Senate ,and yes the President.Cut your own wages first and the deal with others.But most definitly lieve Social Security out of it.
Copyright © 2013 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Morningstar Inc. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Morningstar Inc. Quotes delayed by up to 15 minutes, except where indicated otherwise. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by Morningstar Inc.
A basic income policy can actually ensure a decent standard of living for everyone.
- People left $500,000 in coins at airports last year
- How your driving can affect your credit
- Obamacare projected to cost hundreds of billions less
- November jobs report: Winners and losers
- Student loan debt climbs for 5th year in a row
- Wall Street finally notices Bitcoin
- Part-time workers hurt by on-call system
- 5 myths about late payments and your FICO scores
- Auto loan interest rates hit record low
[BRIEFING.COM] The third time wasn't a charm. Once again, the S&P 500 made a run at clearing the 1811 level with conviction, but for the third time today that run was stopped out just above the 1811 level.
There hasn't been any cascading selling interest after the third failure, but intraday charts certainly show a detectable pullback from the best levels of the day.
Sector-wise there aren't any concerted leaders; rather, there is a grouping of sectors sporting modest ... More
More Market News
The social-media stock surged in its first day of trading. But in the month since, shares have only gained five cents.